본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

아우구스투스 황제와 수도 로마

Princeps Augustus and Urbs Roma

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

That the city of Rome did not show the dignified image appropriate to its imperial stature was a generally accepted self-image of the Romans during the last century B.C., especially among the principes viri who had travelled to the Hellenistic metropoleis such as Alexandria and Pergamum. Thus Julius Caesar in his last few years as dictator envisioned the metamorphosis of the Urbs, developing a master plan, of which the most substantial ingredients were to adorn and enlarge the city: the plans de urbe ornanda et augenda. Octavian, when he survived as the final victor through the civil war ensuing the demise of Julius Caesar, felt the same responsibility concerning the Urbs as his adoptive father had as a autocratic ruler, of reshaping it with the perspective of urban planning. Thus he inherited Caesar's master plan, though not with the same publicity as when he completed as an heir the construction works his adoptive father had left unfinished. Yet, with the exception of the plan to divert the Tiber to the west edge of the mons Vaticanus, Augustan master plan was following the same trek as Caesar's plans de urbe ornanda et augenda. This paper traces in a chronological order the major public operations, for which Octavian/Augustus was responsible directly or indirectly during the final years of his triumvirate and the following decades of his reign as princeps. It can't be denied that all the architectural and monumental results converged to the effect of “finding a city of bricks and leaving a city of marble” (Suetonius, Augustus 28. 3) as he himself seemed to have boasted towards the end of his reign, thus forcing upon the posterity the illusion that to embellish the Urbs with the imperial dignity had been consistently a top priority agenda in making decisions on pubic works. Yet, the illusion need to be balanced by the ad hoc strategy of producing propagandistic images of his and the new regime called Principate. The images of power were the immediate consideration rather than the synthetical image of the Urbs as the world city. In this perspective, we could detect two stages during the period in consideration: firstly, the late 30 B.C. 's and early 20 B.C.'s building operations within and around the historic center of the Urbs (i.e. the Forum Romanum as well as Capitolium and Palatium); secondly, the public works during the following two decades (27~7 B.C.) concentrated on the Campus Martius, a suburban area on the Tiber's left bank. The year of 7 B.C. looms large as the watershed marking the end of the major construction works of Augustan age. It seems as a natural corollary that the same year witnessed the administrative reform: the Servian 4 regions were replaced by 14 regions with suburban areas incorporated within the city precinct such as the Campus Martius and the Transtevere, thus making the Urbs enlarged and unwalled, open center of the world. A couple of distinctions between the two stages are easily detected other than the shift of the scene. In the former, the principes viri could still, though seemingly with the encouragement of Octavian/Augustus, initiate the works of construction or restoration as they had done all along the republican past, while in the latter the initiative in the public works came to be monopolized by the princeps and his relatives. Another change that occurred in transition to the second was about the nature of the public works. Unlike in the first stage, when the operations had been mostly related with monuments and official buildings, those of the second stage's were, at least partly, intended as facilities for public amusement and relaxation. The most prominent figure initiating this shift was M. Agrippa, Augustus' old confidant and son-in-law. Yet despite these shifts and changes, there had been lingering always the invariable motivation and purpose behind the great and small constructions in the Urbs: that of impressing on the viewers the image of power and enhancing the legitimacy and greatness of the new ruler and his dynasty. The image of the world center shining with marble monuments and buildings could be, all in all, seen as the byproduct enabled by the longevity of the Augustan reign.

Abstract

That the city of Rome did not show the dignified image appropriate to its imperial stature was a generally accepted self-image of the Romans during the last century B.C., especially among the principes viri who had travelled to the Hellenistic metropoleis such as Alexandria and Pergamum. Thus Julius Caesar in his last few years as dictator envisioned the metamorphosis of the Urbs, developing a master plan, of which the most substantial ingredients were to adorn and enlarge the city: the plans de urbe ornanda et augenda. Octavian, when he survived as the final victor through the civil war ensuing the demise of Julius Caesar, felt the same responsibility concerning the Urbs as his adoptive father had as a autocratic ruler, of reshaping it with the perspective of urban planning. Thus he inherited Caesar's master plan, though not with the same publicity as when he completed as an heir the construction works his adoptive father had left unfinished. Yet, with the exception of the plan to divert the Tiber to the west edge of the mons Vaticanus, Augustan master plan was following the same trek as Caesar's plans de urbe ornanda et augenda. This paper traces in a chronological order the major public operations, for which Octavian/Augustus was responsible directly or indirectly during the final years of his triumvirate and the following decades of his reign as princeps. It can't be denied that all the architectural and monumental results converged to the effect of “finding a city of bricks and leaving a city of marble” (Suetonius, Augustus 28. 3) as he himself seemed to have boasted towards the end of his reign, thus forcing upon the posterity the illusion that to embellish the Urbs with the imperial dignity had been consistently a top priority agenda in making decisions on pubic works. Yet, the illusion need to be balanced by the ad hoc strategy of producing propagandistic images of his and the new regime called Principate. The images of power were the immediate consideration rather than the synthetical image of the Urbs as the world city. In this perspective, we could detect two stages during the period in consideration: firstly, the late 30 B.C. 's and early 20 B.C.'s building operations within and around the historic center of the Urbs (i.e. the Forum Romanum as well as Capitolium and Palatium); secondly, the public works during the following two decades (27~7 B.C.) concentrated on the Campus Martius, a suburban area on the Tiber's left bank. The year of 7 B.C. looms large as the watershed marking the end of the major construction works of Augustan age. It seems as a natural corollary that the same year witnessed the administrative reform: the Servian 4 regions were replaced by 14 regions with suburban areas incorporated within the city precinct such as the Campus Martius and the Transtevere, thus making the Urbs enlarged and unwalled, open center of the world. A couple of distinctions between the two stages are easily detected other than the shift of the scene. In the former, the principes viri could still, though seemingly with the encouragement of Octavian/Augustus, initiate the works of construction or restoration as they had done all along the republican past, while in the latter the initiative in the public works came to be monopolized by the princeps and his relatives. Another change that occurred in transition to the second was about the nature of the public works. Unlike in the first stage, when the operations had been mostly related with monuments and official buildings, those of the second stage's were, at least partly, intended as facilities for public amusement and relaxation. The most prominent figure initiating this shift was M. Agrippa, Augustus' old confidant and son-in-law. Yet despite these shifts and changes, there had been lingering always the invariable motivation and purpose behind the great and small constructions in the Urbs: that of impressing on the viewers the image of power and enhancing the legitimacy and greatness of the new ruler and his dynasty. The image of the world center shining with marble monuments and buildings could be, all in all, seen as the byproduct enabled by the longevity of the Augustan reign.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. M. Hammond, "The Significance of the Speech of Maecenas in Dio Cassius, Book LII", Transactions of American Philological Association, 63, pp.88~102 (1932)
  2. T. J. Luce, "The Dating of Livy's first Decade", Transactions of American Philological Association, 96, pp.209~240 (1965)
  3. D. Favro, "The Urban Image of Augustan Rome" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  4. L. Homo, "Rome Imperiale et l'Urbanisme dans l'Antiquité" (1971), Paris
  5. 김경현, "제정기 로마 시의 주택사정", 에피스테메, 1, pp.104~146 (2007)
  6. F. Kolb, "Die Geschichte der Stadt in der Antike", pp.545~563 (1995), München
  7. Z. Yavetz, "Plebs and Princeps" (1969), Oxford
  8. F. Millar, "The Emperor in the Roman World" (1977), Cornell Univ. Press
  9. D. Kienast, "Augustus: Princeps und Monarch", pp.57~59 (1982), Darmstadt
  10. K. Kraft, "Der Sinn des Mausoleums des Augustus", Historia, 16, pp.191~193 (1967)
  11. P. Zanker, "The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus" (1990), Univ. of Michigan Press
  12. 김경현, "아우구스투스 시대 문학과 조형물에 나타난 로물루스 왕의 이미지", 서양고대사연구, 10, pp.86~ (2002)
  13. L. Haselberger, "Urbem Adornare. Die Stadt Rom und ihre Gestaltumwandlung unter Augustus", Journal of Roman Archaeology, Supplementary Ser, 64 (2007)
  14. L. Richardson Jr., "A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome" (1992), The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  15. D. Favro, "Pater Urbis: Augustus as city Father of Rome", Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 51, pp.67~68 (1992)
  16. M. Reinhold, "Agrippa, In A Biography" (1933), New York
  17. H. B. Evans, "Agrippa's Water Plan", American Journal of Archaeology, 86, pp.401~411 (1982)
  18. T. Hölscher, "Augustus und die Macht der Archäeologie", La Révolution romaine après R. Syme. Bilans et Perspectives (2000), Entretiens Fondation Hardt
  19. F. Millar, "Triumvirate and Principate", Journal of Roman Studies, 63, pp.50~67 (1973)
  20. 김경현, "Tacitus의 저술에서 자유의 이념", 서양고대사연구, 15, pp.105~106 (2004)
  21. P. Zanker, "Der Apollontempel auf dem Palatin, In Città e Architettura nella Roma Imperiale", pp.21~27 (1983)
  22. N. Purcell, "Rome and its Development under Augustus and his Successor(2nd ed.)", pp.789~ (1996), Cambridge Ancient History
  23. A. Fraschetti, "Auguste et Vesta sur le Palatin, In Rome, les Césars et la Ville aux deux premiers siècles de notre ère", pp.107~117 (2001), Presses Univ. de Rennes
  24. E. S. Ramage, "The Nature and Purpose of Augustus' “Res Gestae”", Historia Einzelschriften, 54, pp.73~100 (1987)
  25. J. R. Fears, "The Cult of Virtues and Roman Imperial Ideology", Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II, 17(2), pp.875~ (1981)
  26. A. Wallace-Hadrill, "Augustan Rome", pp.50~ (1993), Bristol Classical Press
  27. J. C. Anderson, Jr., "The Historical Topography of the Imperial Fora", pp.66~69
  28. M. Griffin, "Urbs Roma, Plebs and Princeps, In Images of Empire", pp.20~ (1991), JSOT Press
  29. K. Brodersen, "Studien zur römischen Raumerfassung", pp.254~260 (2003), Georg Olms Verlag
  30. M. C. J. Putnam, "Horace's Carmen Saeculare. Ritual Magic and the Poet's Art", pp.72~95 (2000), Yale Univ. Press
  31. M. Beard, "The Roman Triumph", pp.295~296 (2007), The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press
  32. F. W. Shipley, "Chronology of the Building Operations in Rome from the Death to the Death of Augustus", Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, 9, pp.46~58 (1931)
  33. A. Ziolkowski, "Was Agrippa's Pantheon the temple of Mars in Campo?", Proceedings of the British School at Rome, 62, pp.261~274 (1994)
  34. L. Richardson, Jr., "The Evolution of the Porticus Octaviae", American Journal of Archaeology, 80, pp.57~65 (1976)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)