질적 연구에서 자기 성찰의 의미와 방법 - 미술교육 연구방법론적 탐구 -
The Meanings and Methods of Self-study in Qualitative Research - A Methodological Investigation in Art Educational Research -
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently the nature and contents of art education have been rapidly expanded. Along with the change of visual culture environments, there has been an effort to re-construct the meaning of 'art' as a subject. In addition, the government has established and implemented various culture and arts education policies so as to provide the equal chance for all citizens to learn and appreciate art. In order to improve art education using these increasing social demand and attention as a positive impetus, there should be more vigorous and systematic art educational research. In other words, we need the researchers and research methods that can recognize the contextual meanings of art and that can draw the knowledge and understanding of aesthetic experiences of those who have different social and cultural backgrounds. In art educational research, the academic attitude that encompasses only scientific and mathematic methods as valid research has placed the hinderance that has led art educational researchers to quantify something that cannot be measured. However, qualitative research methods have been introduced and experimented augmenting the range of research methods for drawing the contextual understandings and meanings of art education. Although the term ‘qualitative research' has become widespread, it is not easy to find a comprehensive qualitative research at this point. This study purports to discuss the nature and characteristics of qualitative research from the methodological perspective. Paying attention to the importance of the researcher in the whole process of research, this article explores the meaning of self-reflection of a qualitative researcher based on the theoretical background and cases. In order to illustrate this methodological discourse, the methods and cases of self-reflection are presented. This study aims at providing a guideline with which a researcher can develop the ability to reflect upon field experiences and to execute a qualitative research with scrutiny.
Abstract
Recently the nature and contents of art education have been rapidly expanded. Along with the change of visual culture environments, there has been an effort to re-construct the meaning of 'art' as a subject. In addition, the government has established and implemented various culture and arts education policies so as to provide the equal chance for all citizens to learn and appreciate art. In order to improve art education using these increasing social demand and attention as a positive impetus, there should be more vigorous and systematic art educational research. In other words, we need the researchers and research methods that can recognize the contextual meanings of art and that can draw the knowledge and understanding of aesthetic experiences of those who have different social and cultural backgrounds. In art educational research, the academic attitude that encompasses only scientific and mathematic methods as valid research has placed the hinderance that has led art educational researchers to quantify something that cannot be measured. However, qualitative research methods have been introduced and experimented augmenting the range of research methods for drawing the contextual understandings and meanings of art education. Although the term ‘qualitative research' has become widespread, it is not easy to find a comprehensive qualitative research at this point. This study purports to discuss the nature and characteristics of qualitative research from the methodological perspective. Paying attention to the importance of the researcher in the whole process of research, this article explores the meaning of self-reflection of a qualitative researcher based on the theoretical background and cases. In order to illustrate this methodological discourse, the methods and cases of self-reflection are presented. This study aims at providing a guideline with which a researcher can develop the ability to reflect upon field experiences and to execute a qualitative research with scrutiny.
참고문헌 (37)
- 김영철, "질적 연구에 있어서의 글쓰기", 교육인류학연구, 2(2), pp.71~96 (1999)
- 김선아, "미술교육연구의 방법론적 고찰 : 질적 연구방법론을 중심으로", 조형교육, 26(26), pp.37~54 (2005), 한국조형교육학회
- 김지균, "미술교육연구 방법의 흐름과 경향", 미술교육논총, 19(1), pp.29~52 (2005), 한국미술교육학회
- 김황기, "미술교육에서의 질적 연구 방법의 탐색", 미술교육논총, 19(2), pp.81~96 (2005), 한국미술교육학회
- 안금희, "미술교육에서의 질적 연구 동향", 교육인류학연구, 4(3), pp.111~151 (2001)
- 지역사회 연계 학교 문화예술교육 시범사업 영향평가, "우주희", 한국문화예술교육진흥원, ~, pp.KACES-0810-C022 (2008)
- 이근호, "질적 연구 방법론으로서의 현상학: 독특성과 보편성 사이의 변증법적 탐구 양식", 교육인류학연구, 10(2), pp.41~64 (2007), 한국교육인류학회
- 이남인, "현상학과 질적연구방법", 철학과 현상학 연구, 24(24), pp.91~122 (2005), 한국현상학회
- 이효선, "질적 연구: 해석과 이해" (2005), 학견사
- 신동일, "내러티브탐구 학습을 통한 교육 경험의 성찰", 교육인류학연구, 9(2), pp.71~100 (2006), 한국교육인류학회
- 정혜경, "간호학에서 질적연구방법에 대한 현상학적 고찰", 철학과 현상학연구, 18, pp.176~102 (2001)
- 조용기, "질적 연구의 성격", 교육인류학연구, 4(1), pp.157~168 (2001)
- 조용환, "질적 기술, 분석, 해석", 교육인류학연구, 2(2), pp.27~63 (1999)
- 최영신, "질적 자료 수집: 생애사 연구 사례를 중심으로", 교육인류학연구, 2(2), pp.1~22 (1999)
- 황연주, "문화예술교육의 미술교육적 논의", 미술교육논총, 19(1), pp.1~28 (2005), 한국미술교육학회
- Anderson, T., "삶을 위한 미술교육" (2007), 예경
- Barone, T. E., "On the demise of subjectivity in educational inquiry", Curriculum Inquiry, 22(1), pp.25~38 (1992)
- Barone, T. E., "Arts-based educational research, then, now, and later", Studies in Art Education, 48(1), pp.4~8 (2006)
- Barone, T. E., "Arts-based educational research. in: Complementary methods for research in education" (1997), AERA
- Bleicher, J., "The hermeneutic imagination" (1982), Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd
- Blumer, H., "Symbolic Interactionism" (1969), Prentice-Hall
- Cunningham, F., "Objectivity in social science" (1973), University of Toronto Press
- Deway, J., "Art as experience" (1934), Perigee Books
- Eisner, E. E., "The enlightened eye" (1991), Macmillan Publishing Company
- Eisner, E. E., "새로운 눈으로 보는 미술교육" (1998), 예경
- Eisner, E. E., "Does arts-based research have a future?", Studies in Art Education, 48(1), pp.9~18 (2006)
- Janesick, V., "Stretching exercises for qualitative researchers" (1998), SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Mason, J., "Qualitative researching" (1996), SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Maxwell, J. A., "Qualitative research design: An interactive approach" (2005), SAGE Publications
- Merriam, S. B., "정성연구방법론과 사례연구" (2005), 교우사
- Mittapalli, K., "Madhubani art: A journey of an education researcher seeking self-development answers through art and self-study", The Qualitative Report, 13(2), pp.244~261 (2008)
- Kim, S., "Art in schools: considering the profession of teaching secondary art" (2003), Unpublished dissertation, Syracuse University
- Kvale, S., "인터뷰: 내면을 보는 눈" (1998), 하나
- Quinn, R., "A dialogue in words and images between two artists doing arts-based educational research", International Journal of Education and Arts, 9(5), pp.1~29 (2008)
- Rodriquez, A., "Interpretive social science" (2006), University of California Press
- Sinner, A., "Arts-based education research dissertations: Reviewing the practices of new scholars", Canadian Journal of Education, 29(4), pp.1223~1270 (2006)
- Taylor, "Walking with a ghost: arts-based research, music videos, and the re-performing body", International Journal of Education and Arts, 8(6), pp.2~26 (2007)