베트남한자음 牙音系의 반영양상 - 한일한자음과의 비교를 중심으로 -
Reflects of Velar in the Sino - Vietnamese: Comparative Study with Sino - Korean and Sino - Japanese
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses on the origin of Sino-Vietnamese through reflects of velar mainly Comparative Study with Sino-Korean and Sino-Japanese, and the following conclusions were drawn. I decided that velar system of Sino-Vietnamese originated by late Southern and Northern Dynasties sounds of 5th century and Qieyun sounds of 7th century. A main key of origin is a changing of voiced muddy sounds to aspirated sounds and a changing of nasal to non-nasal stops in Qin sounds of 8th century. Voiced muddy sounds changed voiceless aspirated secondarily-clear sounds and nasal stops clear-muddy sounds changed non-nasal stops in Qin sounds of 8th century. Initial-g changed kh in Qin sounds of 8th century. but only 5 characters of 6.8% reflected kh and 65 characters of 84.9% reflected k. It means that reflects of upto Qieyun sounds of 7th century. Initial-ng changed non-nasal stops in Qin sounds of 8th century. But 47 characters of 74.6% reflected ng. It means that Sino-Vietnamese reflected upto Qieyun sounds of 7th century. And velar in the Sino-Vietnamese contained Qin sounds of 8th century and modern sounds. In conclusion, Sino-Vietnamese originated by late Southern and Northern Dynasties sounds of 5th century and Qieyun sounds of 7th century, and effected Qin sounds of 8th century and modern sounds. From now on, through analysis of another initials, I think that origin of Sino-Vietnamese can be cleared.
Abstract
This paper discusses on the origin of Sino-Vietnamese through reflects of velar mainly Comparative Study with Sino-Korean and Sino-Japanese, and the following conclusions were drawn. I decided that velar system of Sino-Vietnamese originated by late Southern and Northern Dynasties sounds of 5th century and Qieyun sounds of 7th century. A main key of origin is a changing of voiced muddy sounds to aspirated sounds and a changing of nasal to non-nasal stops in Qin sounds of 8th century. Voiced muddy sounds changed voiceless aspirated secondarily-clear sounds and nasal stops clear-muddy sounds changed non-nasal stops in Qin sounds of 8th century. Initial-g changed kh in Qin sounds of 8th century. but only 5 characters of 6.8% reflected kh and 65 characters of 84.9% reflected k. It means that reflects of upto Qieyun sounds of 7th century. Initial-ng changed non-nasal stops in Qin sounds of 8th century. But 47 characters of 74.6% reflected ng. It means that Sino-Vietnamese reflected upto Qieyun sounds of 7th century. And velar in the Sino-Vietnamese contained Qin sounds of 8th century and modern sounds. In conclusion, Sino-Vietnamese originated by late Southern and Northern Dynasties sounds of 5th century and Qieyun sounds of 7th century, and effected Qin sounds of 8th century and modern sounds. From now on, through analysis of another initials, I think that origin of Sino-Vietnamese can be cleared.
참고문헌 (34)
- 權仁澣, "국어사연구", pp.283~344 (1997), 태학사
- 權仁澣, "國語史와 漢字音", pp.57~94 (2006), 박이정
- 계지연, "베트남漢字音의 聲類體系 硏究-韓日漢字音과의 對照를 통해서", 碩士, pp.2016
- 김정빈, "일본오음연구", pp.371~530 (2007), 책사랑
- 朴炳采, "古代國語의 硏究 音韻篇", pp.112~262 (1971), 고려대학교 출판부
- 朴炳采, "古代國語의 音韻比較硏究", pp.1~39 (1990), 고려대학교 출판부
- 辛容泰, "韓國漢字音の母胎に關する考察", 人文科學硏究, 1, pp.121~153 (1982), 국제대학교
- 엄익상, "한국한자음에 관한 칼그렌 가설의 문제점", 중국문학, 54, pp.241~261 (2008), 한국중국어문학회
- 李京哲, "佛母大孔雀明王經 字音硏究", pp.171~274 (2005), 책사랑
- 이경철, "輕脣音化의 반영을 통해 본 베트남漢字音의 母胎에 관하여 -日本漢字音과의 比較를 중심으로-", 일본어학연구, (35), pp.277~295 (2012), 한국일본어학회
- 이경철, "各國 漢字音에 나타나는 肴韻의 字音形에 대하여", 일본학보, (91), pp.231~242 (2012), 한국일본학회[DOI]
- 李敦柱, "漢語音韻學의 理解", pp.198~202 (1995), 탑출판사
- 이상이, "한국․일본․베트남漢字音 韻類體系 比較硏究", 博士, pp.2015
- Le Tuan Son, "한국어와 베트남어의 한자음 비교 연구 : 성모와 운모를 중심으로", 석사, 국어학, pp.2006
- Le Tuan Son, "한국어와 베트남어의 한자음 비교 연구-성모를 중심으로", 인문과학연구, 10, pp.45~49 (2008), 대구가톨릭대학교 인문과학연구소
- Pham thi Ngoc, "한국 한자어와 베트남 한자어 비교연구-양국의 한자 어휘 및 한자음운체계를 중심으로", pp.2010
- 有坂秀世, "国語音韻史の研究 増補新版", pp.303~326 (1957), 三省堂
- 伊藤智ゆき, "朝鮮漢字音の硏究", 博士, pp.2002
- 榎木久薫, "光明真言土沙勧信記の字音について", 鎌倉時代語研究, 12, pp.284~ (1989), 鎌倉時代語研究會
- 榎木久薫, "高山寺藏寛喜元年識語本新訳華厳経加点字翻刻並びに分韻表", 鎌倉時代語研究, 21, pp.182~270 (1998), 鎌倉時代語研究會
- 小倉肇, "金光明最勝王經音義字音攷(Ⅱ)", 弘前大学教育学部紀要, (41), pp.1~10 (1979), 弘前大学
- 小倉肇, "日本呉音の研究", pp.1~737 (1995), 新典社
- 河野六郎, "河野六郎著作集2", pp.295~511 (1979), 平凡社
- 佐々木勇, "平安鎌倉時代に於ける日本漢音の研究 資料篇", pp.2~273 (1982), 汲古書院
- 沼本克明, "日本漢字音史論輯", pp.125~186 (1995), 汲古書院
- 三根谷徹, "中古漢語と越南漢字音", pp.393~496 (1993), 汲古書院
- 江佳璐, "越南漢字音的歷史層次硏究", 博士, 國文學系, pp.2011
- 李方桂, "上古音硏究", pp.36~78 (2001), 商务印书館
- Bernhard Karlgren, "中國音韻學", pp.42~103 (1985), 一志社
- Ðoàn Thiện Thuật, "Ngữ âm thiểg Việt, Khoa Học Xã hội Hà Nội", pp.5~32 (1976), 삼지사
- E.G. pulleyblank, "MIDDLE CHINESE: A Study in Historical Phonology", pp.162~171 (1984), University of British Columbia Press
- Nguyȇ̄n Tài Cân, "Nguồn gốc và Quá trình hình thành cách đọc Hán Việt", pp.5~12 (1979), Khoa Học Xã hội Hà Nội
- William H. Baxter, "A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology", pp.206~210 (1992), Mouton de Gruyter