On Island Sensitivity in Fragment Answers
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It has been observed that island violations can be obviated in Korean fragment answer constructions. This kind of island violation exemption usually is attributed to the repair by delete strategy as discussed in Merchant (2001, 2004), Park (2005) and others. Recently, Ahn and Cho (2015) claim that there are island sensitive fragment answers which contain covert correlations of the fragment remnant and the island sensitive and insensitive fragment answers can be accounted for on the basis of merger-sprouting distinction. It is argued in this paper that this proposed distinction between island sensitive and insensitive fragment answers is worth pursuing but the actual examples discussed in Ahn and Cho do not really serve as evidence for the existence of island sensitive fragment answers. It will be shown that there are two types of covert correlates — obligatory and optional correlates and only the optional correlates (not the obligatory correlates discussed in Ahn and Cho) provide evidence for the island sensitive fragment answers.
Abstract
It has been observed that island violations can be obviated in Korean fragment answer constructions. This kind of island violation exemption usually is attributed to the repair by delete strategy as discussed in Merchant (2001, 2004), Park (2005) and others. Recently, Ahn and Cho (2015) claim that there are island sensitive fragment answers which contain covert correlations of the fragment remnant and the island sensitive and insensitive fragment answers can be accounted for on the basis of merger-sprouting distinction. It is argued in this paper that this proposed distinction between island sensitive and insensitive fragment answers is worth pursuing but the actual examples discussed in Ahn and Cho do not really serve as evidence for the existence of island sensitive fragment answers. It will be shown that there are two types of covert correlates — obligatory and optional correlates and only the optional correlates (not the obligatory correlates discussed in Ahn and Cho) provide evidence for the island sensitive fragment answers.
참고문헌 (16)
- 안희돈, "On Scope Asymmetries in Fragments", 생성문법연구, 15(4), pp.661~678 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
- 안희돈, "Notes on Two Types of Fragments", 언어연구, 28(1), pp.19~35 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 안희돈, "On Caseless Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, (70), pp.25~47 (2012), 현대문법학회
- 안희돈, "Right Dislocation vs. Fragment: A Reply to Ko (2014)", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.427~446 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Choe, H. -S., "Successive Cyclic Rightward Movement in Korean", Havard Studies in Korean Linguistics II, pp.40~56 (1987)
- 정대호, "An Elliptical Coordination Analysis of the Right Dislocated Construction in Korean", 언어학, 17(4), pp.1~23 (2009), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 정대호, "Replies to Lee (2009): In Defence of a Double Clause Approach to the Right Dislocated Construction", 현대문법연구, (61), pp.167~196 (2010), 현대문법학회
- 정대호, "Some Notes on Ko’s (2014b, 2015) Hybrid Approach to the Korean RDC", 생성문법연구, 25(3), pp.735~754 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Chung, S., "Sluicing and Logical Form", Natural Language Semantics, (3), pp.239~282 (1995)
- 이정식, "Deriving SOV from SVO in Korean", 언어학, 15(3), pp.1~20 (2007), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 고희정, "Remarks on Right Dislocation Construction in Korean: Challenges to bi-clausal analyses", 어학연구, 50(2), pp.275~310 (2014), 언어교육원
- 고희정, "Two Ways to the Right: A Hybrid approach to Right-dislocation in Korean", 어학연구, 51(1), pp.3~40 (2015), 언어교육원
- Merchant, J., "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands and the Theory of Ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, J., "Fragments and Ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, (27), pp.661~738 (2004)
- Park, B-S., "Island-insensitive Fragment Answers in Korean", WCCFL 24 (2005)
- Sohn, Keun-won, "Some notes on fragments", 영어영문학연구, 34(1), pp.321~339 (2008), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]