On Binding Asymmetries in Fragments
2
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Merchant (2004) analyzes fragmentary utterances as movement of remnant fragments followed by PF-deletion of the full-fledged sentential structures. Under this analysis, DPs in fragments are predicted to show a distribution regulated by the Binding Theory parallel to their correlates in non-fragmentary sentential equivalents. In English, binding phenomena in fragments seem to bear out this prediction. In Korean, however, anaphors which cannot occur in subject positions in full sentential answers can occur in the same position in their fragment answers. Hence, binding asymmetries in Korean fragments seem not to fit in his Movement + PF-deletion analysis. In this paper, we propose that Move and Delete analysis of fragments can be maintained in Korean fragments, and that reinterpretation of binding principles in conjunction with interface conditions (like Vehicle Change) in ellipsis context provides an elegant account for the apparent puzzles that may otherwise be problematic for syntactic treatments, in particular, Move-and-Delete approach to fragments in Korean.
Abstract
Merchant (2004) analyzes fragmentary utterances as movement of remnant fragments followed by PF-deletion of the full-fledged sentential structures. Under this analysis, DPs in fragments are predicted to show a distribution regulated by the Binding Theory parallel to their correlates in non-fragmentary sentential equivalents. In English, binding phenomena in fragments seem to bear out this prediction. In Korean, however, anaphors which cannot occur in subject positions in full sentential answers can occur in the same position in their fragment answers. Hence, binding asymmetries in Korean fragments seem not to fit in his Movement + PF-deletion analysis. In this paper, we propose that Move and Delete analysis of fragments can be maintained in Korean fragments, and that reinterpretation of binding principles in conjunction with interface conditions (like Vehicle Change) in ellipsis context provides an elegant account for the apparent puzzles that may otherwise be problematic for syntactic treatments, in particular, Move-and-Delete approach to fragments in Korean.
참고문헌 (44)
- "The nested dependency constraint and the theory of grammar University of Wisconsin" (1985)
- "On the proper treatment of scrambling Proceedings of Formal Linguistic Society of Mid-America 1", pp.1~17 (1990)
- "On scope asymmetries in fragments", 15, pp.661~678 (2005)
- "Contrast discourse prominence and intensification with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English", 71, pp.63~101 (1995)
- "Raising to Object and Proper Movement" (2001), ms. University of Delaware
- "Lectures on government and binding" (1981)
- "Against reconstruction in ellipsis" (1991)
- "Deriving reflexives", 21, pp.71~84 (2002)
- "The Nature of Syntactic Representation" (1982)
- "More on the categorial analysis of grammatical relations" (1982), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- "Successive cyclic movement and island repair The difference between sluicing and VP ellipsis", 34, pp.143~154 (2003)
- "Interrogative investigations The form meaning and use of English interrogatives" (2000), CSLI Publications
- "Indeterminate agreement: Some consequence for the case systems" (2005), MITWPL #50. Cambridge, MA.
- "Logical form constraint and configurational structures in Japanese University of Washington" (1985)
- "Not scrambling but null topic in fragments" (2005), Dongguk University
- "Move! A minimalist theory of construal" (2001), Blackwell
- "Pro drop in Chinese" (1989)
- "Remarks on the status of the null object Principle and Parameters in Comparative Grammar" (1991), MIT Press
- "Syntactic movement and ellipsis:A minimalist approach" (1997)
- "Elementary operations and optimal derivations" (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- "Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization" (2004), ms. MIT.
- "University of Chicago Press", ku (1987)
- "The syntax of dependent elements University of Massachusetts" (1991)
- "Derivation vs representation in modern transformational syntax:The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory", pp.62~88 (2001), Blackwell
- "Lecture notes:2005 LSA Summer Institute" (2005), MIT
- "Argument scrambling and object shift", 13, pp.39~59 (2003)
- "On short scrambling A contrastive focus movement approach", 38, pp.155~182 (2004)
- "An investigation of scrambling in Korean Proceedings of International Conference in Korean Linguistics" (1990)
- "Paper presented at Harvard Workshop on Korean Linguistics 4" (1991)
- "Scrambling as case-driven obligatory movement theory University of Pennsylvania" (1993)
- "The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford
- "Fragments and ellipsis", 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
- "Scrambling and condition on A-movement Paper presented at WCCFL 10" (1991)
- "Island-insensitivity fragment answers in Korean", 24 (2004)
- "Phase cyclicity and extraction out of ellipsis in English", 14, pp.469~496 (2004)
- "Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory", pp.261~303 (1992)
- "The fine structure of the left periphery:Elements of Grammar", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer Academic Publis, Dordrecht.
- "Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implication" (1985)
- "A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains", 113, pp.481~518 (2003)
- "Negative polarity items, scope and economy" (1995), University of Connecticut
- "Raising to object out of CP", 33, pp.637~652 (2002)
- "The syntax of A-chains A typological study of ECM and scrambling" (1991), Cornell University
- "Emphatic or reflexive? on the endophoric character of French lui-mme and similar complex pronouns", 31, pp.333~374 (1995)