본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Derivational Aspects of Korean Non-contrastive Heavy Adnominal Fragments: Two Strategies

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper focuses on Korean non-contrastive adnominal fragment answers targeting an adnominal, that is, Left Branch, inside a certain NP within antecedent sentence. With regard to this type of fragment answers, Barros, Elliott, and Thomas(2014) argue that the answer is derived from a predicational source among three non-island repair-strategies (short source, cleft source, and predicational source) as an alternative to island repair approach. However, I will argue that when an adnominal fragment answer corresponds to wh-LB within a relative clause, the answer is derived from an amelioration effect-via- processing effect deletion at PF, and when the answer corresponds to wh-LB within a complex island NP, it is derived from amelioration effect-via-island effect deletion at PF.

Abstract

This paper focuses on Korean non-contrastive adnominal fragment answers targeting an adnominal, that is, Left Branch, inside a certain NP within antecedent sentence. With regard to this type of fragment answers, Barros, Elliott, and Thomas(2014) argue that the answer is derived from a predicational source among three non-island repair-strategies (short source, cleft source, and predicational source) as an alternative to island repair approach. However, I will argue that when an adnominal fragment answer corresponds to wh-LB within a relative clause, the answer is derived from an amelioration effect-via- processing effect deletion at PF, and when the answer corresponds to wh-LB within a complex island NP, it is derived from amelioration effect-via-island effect deletion at PF.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. Aghaei, Behrad, "The syntax of ke-clauses and clausal extraposition in Modern Persian", Doctor, pp.2006
  2. Barros, Matt, "More variation in island repair : The clausal", non-clausal distinction, 2013, pp.49, ~
  3. There is no island, "Barros, Matt", Ruters, University of Edinburgh, pp.2014, ~
  4. Bhatt, Rajesh, "The raising analysis of relative clauses : Evidence from adjectival modification", Natural Language Semantics, 10, pp.43~90 (2002)
  5. Bianchi, Valentina., "Consequences of antisymmetry for the syntax of headed relative clauses", Doctor, pp.1995
  6. Bianchi, Valentina, "The raising analysis of relative clauses : A reply to Borsley", Linguistic Inquiry, 31, pp.123~140 (2000)
  7. Borsley, Robert D., "Relative Clauses and the Theory of Phrase Structure", pp.1996
  8. Bośković, Željko, "On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP", Studia Linguistica, 59, pp.1~45 (2005)
  9. Bośković, Željko., "What will you have, DP or NP?", NELS, 37 (2008)
  10. Brame, Michael K., "A new analysis of the relative clause: Evidence for an interpretive theory", Ms., pp.1968
  11. Broadwell, George Aaron, "A-bar anaphora and relative clauses", Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistics Society, 16, pp.47~56 (1986)
  12. Cho, Jai-Hyoung., "Scrambling in Korean: crossover, reconstruction and binding theory", Doctor, pp.1994
  13. Cho, Jai-Hyoung, "Scrambling without syntactic movement", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10, pp.151~180 (2000)
  14. Chomsky, Noam., "Formal syntax", pp.71~132 (1977), Academic Press
  15. Chomsky, Noam., "A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory", MIT occasional papers in linguistics, pp.1~67 (1993)
  16. Chomsky, Noam, "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy" (2001), MIT
  17. Chomsky, Noam, "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
  18. Choo, Mi-Ho., "A unified account of null pronouns in Korean", Doctor, pp.1994
  19. Cole, Peter, "The structure of internally headed relative clauses", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, pp.277~302 (1987)
  20. Corver, Novert., "The syntax of Left Branch Constructions", Ph.D., pp.1990
  21. Griffiths, James, "Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis", Syntax, 17(3), pp.189~234 (2012)
  22. Grosu, Alexander, "On the Nature of the Left Branch Condition", Linguistic Inquiry, 55, pp.308~319 (1974)
  23. Han, Chung-Hye, "Are there ‘'double relative clauses’' in Korean?", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.315~337 (2004)
  24. Han, Jong-Iim, "Syntactic movement analysis of Korean relativization", Language Research, 28, pp.335~357 (1992)
  25. 홍용철, "한국어의 관계절 표지", 언어, 37(4), pp.1067~1094 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  26. Houston, John R, "Dari relative clauses", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 4, pp.32~58 (1974)
  27. Ito, Junko, "Head movement at LF and PF", University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 11, pp.109~138 (1986)
  28. 조미정, "The Structure of Relative Clauses in Korean", 생성문법연구, 12(1), pp.107~138 (2002), 한국생성문법학회
  29. 조미정, "The Morphosyntax of Prenominal Relative Clauses in Korean", 생성문법연구, 21(4), pp.563~585 (2011), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  30. Johnson, Kyle., "The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory", pp.439~479 (2001), Blackwell Publishers
  31. Chung, Daeho., "An Oblique Merge Analysis of Multi-Elemental Fragment Answers in Korean", Proceedings of the 17th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar (2015)
  32. Kang, Young-Se., "Korean syntax and universal grammar", Doctor, pp.1986
  33. Kayne, Richard., "The antisymmetry of syntax" (1994), The MIT Press
  34. Kim, Kwang-Sup., "Why does Head Movement Take Place?", Proceedings of 17 SICOGG, pp.192~208 (2015)
  35. Kim, Kwang-Sup, "Minimalism and Labelling", The English department graduate colloquium on the 2015 (2015)
  36. Kim, Min-Joo, "Does Korean have adjectives?", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 43, pp.71~89 (2002)
  37. Kim, Min-Joo, "Internally-headed relatives in Korean and Japanese parallel direct perception complements: how and why?", Ms., pp.2002
  38. Kim, Min-Joo, "E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27, pp.345~377 (2009)
  39. Kim, Young-Kook, "On the structure of English relative clauses in the feature-checking theory", English Studies, 23, pp.68~82 (1997)
  40. Kwon, Na-Young., "Processing of syntactic and anaphoric gap-filler dependencies in Korean: Evidence from self-paced reading time, ERP and eye-tracking experiments", Doctor, pp.2008
  41. 이은지, "A Raising Analysis of the Relative Head in Korean", 생성문법연구, 22(2), pp.323~357 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  42. 이혜란, "Left Branch Extraction in Korean", 생성문법연구, 23(3), pp.347~372 (2013), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  43. Lee, Ik-Sop, "Kuggo mwunpepron" (1983), Hakyeonsa
  44. Lobeck, Anne., "Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing and identification" (1995), Oxford University Press
  45. Mahajan, A., "On the A", A' distinction: Scrambling and weak crossover in Hindi, MIT, 1989
  46. Merchant, Jason., "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
  47. Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
  48. Merchant, Jason., "Topics in ellipsis", pp.132~153 (2008), Cambridge University Press
  49. Merchant, Jason., "Context-Dependence, Perspective, and Relativity" (2010), Mouton de Gruyter
  50. Schwarzschild, R, "GIVENness, Avoid F and other Constraints on the Placement of Focus", Natural Language Semantics, 7(2), pp.141~177 (1999)
  51. Sailor, Craig, "On the non-existence of non-constituent coordination and non-constituent ellipsis", Proceedings of WCCFL, 31 (2013)
  52. Saito, Mamoru, "Long distance scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~118 (1992)
  53. Sohn, Ho-Min, "Theme-prominence in Korean", Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.2~19 (1980)
  54. Vries de, Mark., "Patterns of relative clauses" (2001), Linguistics in the Netherlands
  55. Vries de, Mark., "The syntax of relativization", Doctor, pp.2002
  56. Yang, Dong-Whee., "The basis of the government-binding theory" (1989), Shinasa
  57. Yang, Hyun-Kwon., "Categories and barriers in Korean", Ph. D., pp.1990
  58. Yoon, Jong-Yurl., "Korean syntax and generalized X-bar theory", Ph. D., pp.1990

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)