Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A considerable volume of literature has addressed the issue of why fragment answers behave differently from full sentences, e.g., with respect to island constraints like the Left Branch Condition (LBC). Drawing attention to conceptual problems with previous analyses, Ahn and Cho (2017a, b, c) propose ‘a limited ellipsis analysis’, according to which fragments (the last elements in case of multiple fragments) can be derived from a copula sentence with the help of phase extension (cf. den Dikken 2006). Despite various theoretical advances Ahn and Cho’s (ibid) copula based explanation has made, the current work points out some defects that their theory bears: (i) phase extension does not help at all in non-elliptical contexts; and (ii) there are some aspects of multiple fragment answers that are orthogonal to their ‘repetitive gapless right dislocation analysis’ of multiple fragments. It will be shown that some sort of PF rescuing mechanism is called for even in their system and that multiple fragments are not necessarily composed of two clauses.
Abstract
A considerable volume of literature has addressed the issue of why fragment answers behave differently from full sentences, e.g., with respect to island constraints like the Left Branch Condition (LBC). Drawing attention to conceptual problems with previous analyses, Ahn and Cho (2017a, b, c) propose ‘a limited ellipsis analysis’, according to which fragments (the last elements in case of multiple fragments) can be derived from a copula sentence with the help of phase extension (cf. den Dikken 2006). Despite various theoretical advances Ahn and Cho’s (ibid) copula based explanation has made, the current work points out some defects that their theory bears: (i) phase extension does not help at all in non-elliptical contexts; and (ii) there are some aspects of multiple fragment answers that are orthogonal to their ‘repetitive gapless right dislocation analysis’ of multiple fragments. It will be shown that some sort of PF rescuing mechanism is called for even in their system and that multiple fragments are not necessarily composed of two clauses.
참고문헌 (28)
- Abe, Jun, "The in-situ approach to sluicing" (2015), John Benjamins
- Ahn Hee-Don, (2012), Hankukmwunhwasa
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "Notes on right dislocation in Korean", Handout presented at the ellipsis workshop (2013), Dongguk University
- 안희돈, "A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.197~220 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "A hybrid ellipsis approach to fragments in Korean", A paper presented at 2017 Fall SMOG.LAK.KGGC Joint Conference (2017)
- 안희돈, "A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.311~359 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- An, Duk-Ho, "Extra deletion in fragment answers and its implication", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25, pp.313~350 (2016)
- An, Duk-Ho, "A way to avoid to islands in fragment answers in Korean", Proceedings of WAFL, 13 (2017)
- Bošković, Željko, "What will you have, DP or NP", NELS, 37 (2008)
- Bošković, Željko, "On NPs and clauses", Ms, pp.2010
- Bošković, Željko, "Phases beyond clauses", Ms, pp.2010
- Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist inquiries: The Framework", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15 (2000)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by phase", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18 (2001)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Beyond explanatory adequacy", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 20, pp.1~28 (2001)
- 정대호, "On the syntax of multi-focused fragment answers in Korean: An oblique merge analysis", 언어연구, 32(3), pp.573~606 (2015), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 하승완, "An Evasion Analysis of Korean Sluicing", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.61~80 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Huang, C.-T. James, "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar", PhD, pp.1982
- 김선웅, "A Note on NP", DP Parameter: Left Branch Extraction in Korean, 2011, pp.28(2), 257~269[DOI]
- Lee, Chung-hoon, "Hankwuke hwupochwung kwumwunuy kwuco ‘The structure of Korean after-thought constructions’", mwunyenkwu, 142, pp.31~54 (2009)
- 이정훈, "후보충 구문의 구조와 Ω 그리고 빈칸", 현대문법연구, (64), pp.95~116 (2011), 현대문법학회
- Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
- Park, Bum-Sik, "Locality and identity in ellipsis", PhD, pp.2005
- 박범식, "Multiple fragment answers in Korean", 언어연구, 30(3), pp.453~472 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 박범식, "Multiple Fragments Do Not Mean Multiple Clauses", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.307~323 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 박범식, "Left Branch Extraction in Multiple Fragments and Its Implications for Island Violations in Korean", 언어, 41(1), pp.1~19 (2016), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 박명관, "On the Syntax of Multiple Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, (80), pp.1~22 (2014), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 윤정회, "Bare Fragment Answers as Elliptical Pseudoclefts", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.365~384 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Yoon, J. Hye-Suk, "The architecture of right dislocation in Korean and Japanese" (2009), University of Illinois