본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 동형이의어와 단어접근 모형비교: 청각 단어 판단과제의 반응자료 시간 중심으로

Testing two models of lexical access: Korean homonyms in an auditory lexical decision task

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Models of lexical access disagree on whether homonyms have a shared word-form representation or not. In order to investigate this controversy, an auditory lexical decision task was conducted in the present work. Experimental stimuli were Korean homonyms, which had never been the subject of a systematic investigation. Korean single syllable words recorded by a native speaker of Korean were presented to 31 native speakers. Response time (RT) was obtained in the task. Mean response time for homonyms turned out not to be significantly different from that for non-homonyms, which supports Independent Network Model rather than Shared Network Model. Furthermore, lexical access time revealed to be a function of token frequency of each stimulus regardless of its membership of homonyms.

Abstract

Models of lexical access disagree on whether homonyms have a shared word-form representation or not. In order to investigate this controversy, an auditory lexical decision task was conducted in the present work. Experimental stimuli were Korean homonyms, which had never been the subject of a systematic investigation. Korean single syllable words recorded by a native speaker of Korean were presented to 31 native speakers. Response time (RT) was obtained in the task. Mean response time for homonyms turned out not to be significantly different from that for non-homonyms, which supports Independent Network Model rather than Shared Network Model. Furthermore, lexical access time revealed to be a function of token frequency of each stimulus regardless of its membership of homonyms.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 강범모, "한국어 형태소 및 어휘 사용 빈도의 분석 2" (2004), 고려대학교민족문화연구원
  2. Bybee, J. L., "Phonology and Language Use" (2003), Cambridge UP
  3. Caramazza, A., "How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?", Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, pp.177~208 (1997)
  4. Caramazza, A., "The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, pp.1430~1450 (2001)
  5. Caramazza, A., "The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: evidence from the top-of -the-tongue phenomenon", Cognition, 64, pp.309~343 (1998)
  6. Dell, G. S., "Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors", Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, pp.131~149 (1990)
  7. Jescheniak, J. D., "Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological from", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, pp.824~843 (1994)
  8. Jescheniak, J. D., "Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production: Comments on Caramazza, Costa, et al. (2001) and new experimental da", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, pp.432~438 (2001)
  9. Kang, B-M., "Aspects of the use of homonym", Language Research, 41, pp.1~29 (2005)
  10. Kim, S. A., "Paper presented at the 154th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America" (2007), Louisiana
  11. Levelt, W. J. M., "Models of word production", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, pp.223~232 (1999)
  12. Levelt, W. J. M., "A theory of lexical access in speech production", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp.1~75 (1999)
  13. Levelt, W. J. M., "The time course of lexical access in speech production:A study of picture naming.Psychological Review,98,122-142", Psychological Review, 98, pp.122~142 (1991)
  14. Nielsen, K., "The interaction between spontaneous imitation and linguistic knowledge", Working Papers in Phonetics, 105, pp.125~137 (2007)
  15. Pierrehumbert, J. B., "Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast, in: Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure", pp.137~157 (2001), John Benjamins
  16. Roelofs, A., "A speaking-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking", Cognition, 42, pp.107~142 (1992)
  17. Roelofs, A., "A case for the lemma", lexeme distinction in models of speaking; Comment on Caramazza and Miozo (1997), 1997, pp.69, 219~230
  18. Shatzman, K., "The word frequency effect in picture naming: contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures", Brain and Language, 90, pp.160~169 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)