본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 시․청각 동음동철이의 어절 재인에 나타나는 어휘-의미 상호작용

Lexico-semantic interactions during the visual and spoken recognition of homonymous Korean Eojeols

남기춘|신지영|강귀영|유도영|김현경|남현민|김준우|전인서
한국음성학회 (The Korean Society of Speech Sciences)|2021.03|말소리와 음성과학 (Phonetics and Speech Sciences)|제13권 제1호|pp. 1-15

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

visual word recognitionspoken word recognitionlexical ambiguityhomonymKorean Eojeol
주제분류학제간연구

초록

The present study investigated the mental representation and processing of an ambiguous word in the bimodal processing system by manipulating the lexical ambiguity of a visually or auditorily presented word. Homonyms (e.g., ‘물었다’) with more than two meanings and control words (e.g., ‘고통을’) with a single meaning were used in the experiments. The lemma frequency of words was manipulated while the relative frequency of multiple meanings of each homonym was balanced. In both experiments using the lexical decision task, a robust frequency effect and a critical interaction of word type by frequency were found. In Experiment 1, spoken homonyms yielded faster latencies relative to control words (i.e., ambiguity advantage) in the low frequency condition, while ambiguity disadvantage was found in the high frequency condition. A similar interactive pattern was found in visually presented homonyms in the subsequent Experiment 2. Taken together, the first key finding is that interdependent lexico-semantic processing can be found both in the visual and auditory processing system, which in turn suggests that semantic processing is not modality dependent, but rather takes place on the basis of general lexical knowledge. The second is that multiple semantic candidates provide facilitative feedback only when the lemma frequency of the word is relatively low.

Abstract

The present study investigated the mental representation and processing of an ambiguous word in the bimodal processing system by manipulating the lexical ambiguity of a visually or auditorily presented word. Homonyms (e.g., ‘물었다’) with more than two meanings and control words (e.g., ‘고통을’) with a single meaning were used in the experiments. The lemma frequency of words was manipulated while the relative frequency of multiple meanings of each homonym was balanced. In both experiments using the lexical decision task, a robust frequency effect and a critical interaction of word type by frequency were found. In Experiment 1, spoken homonyms yielded faster latencies relative to control words (i.e., ambiguity advantage) in the low frequency condition, while ambiguity disadvantage was found in the high frequency condition. A similar interactive pattern was found in visually presented homonyms in the subsequent Experiment 2. Taken together, the first key finding is that interdependent lexico-semantic processing can be found both in the visual and auditory processing system, which in turn suggests that semantic processing is not modality dependent, but rather takes place on the basis of general lexical knowledge. The second is that multiple semantic candidates provide facilitative feedback only when the lemma frequency of the word is relatively low.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Bates, D., "Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4", Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), pp.1~51 (2015)
  2. Borowsky, R., "Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification", Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), pp.63~85 (1996)
  3. Clark, H. H., "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy : A critique of language statistics in psychological research", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(4), pp.335~359 (1973)
  4. Diependaele, K., "Fast phonology and the bimodal interactive activation model", European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), pp.764~778 (2010)
  5. 도재학, "국어 문장의 중의성에 대하여 - 언표 및 발화 문장에 따른 유형 분류를 중심으로 -", 아시아문화연구, 46, pp.40~72 (2018), 아시아문화연구소[DOI]
  6. Forster, K. I., "Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access", Memory and Cognition, 4, pp.53~61 (1976)
  7. Francis, W. N., "Frequency analysis of English usage : Lexicon and grammar" (1982), Houghton Mifflin
  8. Gernsbacher, M. A., "Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 113(2), pp.256~281 (1984)
  9. Grainger, J., "Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition : Effects of masked homophone primes", Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), pp.218~233 (1994)
  10. Grainger, J., "Orthographic processing in visual word recognition : A multiple read-out model", Psy-chological Review, 103(3), pp.518~565 (1996)
  11. Grainger, J., "Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(6), pp.981~998 (2005)
  12. Hauk, O., "The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data", Neuroimage, 30(4), pp.1383~1400 (2006)
  13. Hino, Y., "Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming : An alternative to lexical access accounts", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 22(6), pp.1331~1356 (1996)
  14. Hino, Y., "Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), pp.686~713 (2002)
  15. Hino, Y., "Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks : Are they due to semantic coding", Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), pp.247~273 (2006)
  16. Holley-Wilcox, P., "April). The effect of homophony with auditory presentation of stimuli", Proceedings of the 91st Annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association (1977)
  17. Hong, J., "A study on disambiguation processing in Korean machine translation", Korean Language Society, 50, pp.241~267 (2007)
  18. Hong, J., "Korean dictionary of ambiguous Eojeols" (2000), Taehaksa
  19. Jastrzembski, J. E., "Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon", Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), pp.278~305 (1981)
  20. Jastrzembski, J. E., "Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(5), pp.534~537 (1975)
  21. Jun, S. A., "K-ToBI(Korean ToBI)labelling conventions1", Speech Sciences, 7(1), pp.143~169 (2000)
  22. 강범모, "동음이의어의 사용 양상", 어학연구, 41(1), pp.1~29 (2005), 언어교육원
  23. Kang, B., "Frequency of Korean usage : 15 million words based on sejong form semantic analysis corpus" (2009), Hankukmunhwasa
  24. Kellas, G., "Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Per-ception and Performance, 14(4), pp.601~609 (1988)
  25. Kim, J, "Lexical factors that influence the Korean Eojeol recognition", Doctor, pp.2016
  26. Klein, D. E., "The representation of polysemous words", Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), pp.259~282 (2001)
  27. Klepousniotou, E., "Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition : An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words", Journal of Neuroling-uistics, 20(1), pp.1~24 (2007)
  28. 권유안, "글 단어 읽기 이해에서 음운 정보의 활성화: 동음이의어의 사건관련뇌파 증거", 언어과학, 20(2), pp.1~12 (2013), 한국언어과학회
  29. 이호영, "한국어 중의어 명사의 심성어휘 표상", 석사, 심리학, pp.2010
  30. McClelland, J. L., "On the time relations of mental processes : An examination of systems of processes in cascade", Psychological Review, 86(4), pp.287~330 (1979)
  31. Millis, M. L., "The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time : Now you see it, now you don’t", Memory and Cognition, 17, pp.141~147 (1989)
  32. Mirman, D., "Effect of representational distance between meanings on recognition of ambiguous spoken words", Cognitive Science, 34(1), pp.161~173 (2010)
  33. 박태진, "한국어 단어의 주관적 빈도 추정치 및 단어 재인에 미치는 빈도 효과", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 15(2), pp.349~366 (2003), 한국인지및생물심리학회
  34. Pexman, P. M., "Ambiguity and visual word recognition : Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(4), pp.323~334 (1999)
  35. Pexman, P. M., "Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), pp.1252~1270 (2004)
  36. Pexman, P. M., "Homophone effects in lexical decision", Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), pp.139~156 (2001)
  37. (2019)[URL]
  38. Rayner, K., "Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words : Evidence from eye fixations", Journal of Memory and Language, 33(4), pp.527~544 (1994)
  39. Rodd, J., "Making sense of semantic ambiguity : Semantic competition in lexical access", Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), pp.245~266 (2002)
  40. Rogers, T. T., "Structure and deterioration of semantic memory : A neuropsychological and computational investigation", Psychological Review, 111(1), pp.205~235 (2004)
  41. Rubenstein, H., "Homographic entries in the internal lexicon 1", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(5), pp.487~494 (1970)
  42. Scarborough, D. L., "Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 3(1), pp.1~17 (1977)
  43. Seidenberg, M. S., "A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming", Psy-chological Review, 96(4), pp.523~568 (1989)
  44. 신현정, "한국어 다의동사의 표상", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 16(2), pp.191~209 (2004), 한국인지및생물심리학회
  45. 신지영, "구어에서 운율 표지와 형태 표지의 분포와 기능", 한국어학, 77, pp.37~63 (2017), 한국어학회[DOI]
  46. Simon, D. A., "Disambiguating form and lexical frequency effects in MEG responses using homonyms", Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(2), pp.275~287 (2012)
  47. Wang, W., "The nature of the homophone density effect : An ERP study with Chinese spoken monosyllable homophones", Neuroscience Letters, 516(1), pp.67~71 (2012)
  48. 유기순, "한국어의 어휘적 중의성의 의미점화효과: 동음이의어와 다의어의 비교", 말소리와 음성과학, 1(2), pp.63~73 (2009), 한국음성학회

관련 논문AI추천

한글 시각 단어재인 시의 동음이의어 이득 효과: 어휘판단과제로부터의 증거임채영, 최원일언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2023 · 제104호한국어 동형이의어와 단어접근 모형비교: 청각 단어 판단과제의 반응자료 시간 중심으로김성아한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2009 · 제25권 제2호한국어의 어휘적 중의성의 의미점화효과: 동음이의어와 다의어의 비교남기춘, 유기순한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2009 · 제1권 제2호시각 단어재인 시 음운정보의 역할: 청각-시각 교차양상 점화과제 연구권유안, 이윤형, 태진이한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2017 · 제24권 제1호시각적 단어재인에서 음운부호의 활성화 시점: 동음이의어의 사건관련 뇌전위 연구권유안, 이윤형언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2016 · 제76호한국어 단음절 단어의 시각 재인에서 음절빈도효과구민모, 남기춘, 백연지, 한종혜언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2012 · 제63호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

An analysis of listening errors by Korean EFL learners from self-paced passage dictation조혜선pp. 17-24Perception and production of English fricatives by Chinese learners of English: Error patterns and perception-production relationshipJiaqi Zhang, Buyi Zhang, 이숙향pp. 25-36Age and gender differences in the spectral characteristics of Korean sibilants공은정, 강지은pp. 37-44Hyperparameter experiments on end-to-end automatic speech recognition양형원, 남호성pp. 45-51문장 따라말하기에서 말속도, 발화길이 및 통사적 복잡성에 따른 말더듬 아동과 일반아동의 비유창성 비교심현섭, 김예슬pp. 53-64
원문 보기