한글 시각 단어재인 시의 동음이의어 이득 효과: 어휘판단과제로부터의 증거
The homonym advantage effects in Korean visual word recognition: Evidence from a lexical decision task
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine how homonyms are processed in Korean visual word recognition. In Experiment 1, forty homonyms with unbalanced meaning dominance, 40 control words with a single meaning, and 80 nonwords were selected. Participants conducted a lexical decision task, in which they were asked to decide the lexicality of the letter strings and respond as rapidly as possible without any sacrifice of accuracy. The results showed that homonyms responded faster than monosemic words. In Experiment 2, a consistent pattern of results with those of Experiment 1 was found when homonyms with balanced meaning dominance were used. These results suggest that ambiguous word advantage should be observed in Korean visual word recognition. Theoretical models of visual word recognition were discussed regarding the ambiguous word advantage in visual word recognition.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine how homonyms are processed in Korean visual word recognition. In Experiment 1, forty homonyms with unbalanced meaning dominance, 40 control words with a single meaning, and 80 nonwords were selected. Participants conducted a lexical decision task, in which they were asked to decide the lexicality of the letter strings and respond as rapidly as possible without any sacrifice of accuracy. The results showed that homonyms responded faster than monosemic words. In Experiment 2, a consistent pattern of results with those of Experiment 1 was found when homonyms with balanced meaning dominance were used. These results suggest that ambiguous word advantage should be observed in Korean visual word recognition. Theoretical models of visual word recognition were discussed regarding the ambiguous word advantage in visual word recognition.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김병진, "웹 기반 온라인 자기조절읽기과제를 이용한 단어 예측성 효과의 반복 검증", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 33(2), pp.87~93 (2021), 한국인지및생물심리학회[DOI]
- 김준우, "한국어 시․청각 동음동철이의 어절 재인에 나타나는 어휘-의미 상호작용", 말소리와 음성과학, 13(1), pp.1~15 (2021), 한국음성학회
- 성은진, "덩이글 읽기 시 글의 난이도와 인지 능력 개인차의 상호작용 효과: 안구 운동 추적 연구", 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 32(2), pp.223~234 (2020), 한국인지및생물심리학회[DOI]
- 송호순, "한국인 99%가 헷갈려하는 동음이의어" (2020), 페이스메이커
- 유기순, "한국어의 어휘적 중의성의 의미점화효과: 동음이의어와 다의어의 비교", 말소리와 음성과학, 1(2), pp.63~73 (2009), 한국음성학회
- 홍종선, "한국어 중의어절 사전" (2008), 태학사
- Armstrong, B. C, "The Temporal dynamics of word comprehension and response selection: Computational and behavioral studies", Doctor, pp.2012
- Bates, D., "Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4", Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), pp.1~48 (2015)
- Borowsky, R., "Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), pp.63~85 (1996)
- Forster, K. I., "Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access", Memory and Cognition, 4, pp.53~61 (1976)
- Hino, Y., "Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming : An alternative to lexical access accounts", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 22(6), pp.1331~1356 (1996)
- Hino, Y., "Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding?", Journal of Memory and Language, 55, pp.247~273 (2006)
- Hino, Y., "The relatedness-of-meaning effect for ambiguous words in lexical-decision tasks: when does relatedness matter?", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), pp.180~196 (2010)
- Jastrzembski, J. E., "Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon", Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), pp.278~305 (1981)
- Kellas, G., "Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 14(4), pp.601~609 (1988)
- Kim, D., "Effects of print exposure on an online lexical decision task : A direct replication using a web-based experimental procedure", Frontiers in Psychology, pp.3448~ (2021)
- Klepousniotou, E., "The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon", Brain and language, 81(1-3), pp.205~223 (2002)
- Klepousniotou, E., "Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition : An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words", Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, pp.1~24 (2007)
- Lee, H., "Development and assessment of the Korean author recognition test", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(7), pp.1837~1846 (2019)
- Lin, C. J., "Ambiguity advantage revisited : two meanings are better than one when accessing Chinese nouns", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(1), pp.1~19 (2010)
- McClelland, J. L., "An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception : I. An account of basic findings", Psychological Review, 88(5), pp.375~407 (1981)
- Millis, M. L., "The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time : Now you see it, now you don’t", Memory and Cognition, 17, pp.141~147 (1989)
- Pexman, P. M., "Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?", Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(4), pp.323~334 (1999)
- Pexman, P. M., "Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), pp.1252~1270 (2004)
- Plaut, D. C., "Understanding normal and impaired word reading : Computational principles in quasi-regular domains", Psychological Review, 103, pp.56~115 (1996)
- "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" (2020)[URL]
- Rodd, J., "Making sense of semantic ambiguity : Semantic competition in lexical access", Journal of Memory and Language, 46, pp.245~266 (2002)
- Rodd, J. M., "Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition", Cognitive Science, 28, pp.89~104 (2004)
- Rubenstein, H., "Homographic entries in the internal lexicon 1", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(5), pp.487~494 (1970)
- Seidenberg, M. S., "A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming", Psychological Review, 96, pp.521~568 (1989)
