본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어의 어휘적 중의성의 의미점화효과: 동음이의어와 다의어의 비교

Semantic Priming Effect of Korean Lexical Ambiguity: A Comparison of Homonymy and Polysemy

남기춘|유기순
한국음성학회 (The Korean Society of Speech Sciences)|2009.06|말소리와 음성과학 (Phonetics and Speech Sciences)|제1권 제2호|pp. 63-73

2

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

polysemylexical ambiguityhomonymysemantic priming effects
주제분류학제간연구

초록

The present study was conducted to explore how the processing of lexical ambiguity between homonymy and polysemy differs from each other, and whether the representation of mental lexicon was separated from each lexical ambiguity by a semantic priming paradigm. Homonymy (M1 means the literal meaning of ‘사과’, i.e. apple and M2 means another literal meaning of ‘사과’, i.e. apologize) was used in Experiment 1, and polysemy (M1 means the literal meaning of ‘바람’, i.e. wind and M2 means the figurative meaning of ‘바람’, i.e. wanton) was used in Experiment 2. The results of both experiments showed that a significant semantic priming effect occurs regardless of the type of ambiguities (homonymy and polysemy) and the difference of their semantic processes. However, the semantic priming effect for polysemy was larger than that for homonymy. This result supports the hypothesis that the semantic process of homonymy is different from that of polysemy.

Abstract

The present study was conducted to explore how the processing of lexical ambiguity between homonymy and polysemy differs from each other, and whether the representation of mental lexicon was separated from each lexical ambiguity by a semantic priming paradigm. Homonymy (M1 means the literal meaning of ‘사과’, i.e. apple and M2 means another literal meaning of ‘사과’, i.e. apologize) was used in Experiment 1, and polysemy (M1 means the literal meaning of ‘바람’, i.e. wind and M2 means the figurative meaning of ‘바람’, i.e. wanton) was used in Experiment 2. The results of both experiments showed that a significant semantic priming effect occurs regardless of the type of ambiguities (homonymy and polysemy) and the difference of their semantic processes. However, the semantic priming effect for polysemy was larger than that for homonymy. This result supports the hypothesis that the semantic process of homonymy is different from that of polysemy.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Kim, Bang Han, "The Comprehension of Linguistics" (1992), Mineumsa
  2. 김방한, "언어학의 이해" (1992), 민음사
  3. Park, Young Soon, "The Semantics of Korean" (1994), Korea University press
  4. 박영순, "한국어 의미론" (1994), 고려대학교 출판부
  5. Apresjan, J, "Regular Polysemy", Linguistics, 142, pp.5~32 (1974)
  6. Azuma, T, "Why SAFE Is Better Than FAST: The Relatedness of a Word's Meanings Affects Lexical Decision Times", Journal of Memory and Language, 36, pp.484~504 (1997)
  7. Cairns, H. S, "Effects of prior context upon lexical access during sentence comprehension: A replication and reinterpretation", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, pp.1~8 (1980)
  8. Cairns, H. S, "Lexical information processing during sentence comprehension", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, pp.170~179 (1975)
  9. Clark, H. H, "Understanding old words with new meanings", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp.591~608 (1983)
  10. Conrad, C, "Context effects in sentence comprehension: A Study of subjective lexicon", Memory and Cognition, 2, pp.130~138 (1974)
  11. Copestake, A, "Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension", Journal of Semantics, 12, pp.15~67 (1995)
  12. Duffy, S. A, "Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading", Journal of Memory and Language, 27, pp.429~446 (1988)
  13. Fodor, J. A, "The Modularity of Mind" (1983), MIT Press
  14. Forster, K. I, "Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access", Memory & Cognition, 4, pp.53~61 (1976)
  15. Foss, D. J, "Some effects of ambiguity upon sentence comprehension", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, pp.699~706 (1970)
  16. Foss, D. J, "Some effects of context on the comprehension of ambiguous sentences", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, pp.577~589 (1973)
  17. Frazier, L, "Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses", Journal of Memory and Language, 29, pp.228~244 (1990)
  18. Glucksberg, S, "Context can Constrain Lexical access: Implications for models of language comprehension", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning and Memory, and Cognition, 12, pp.323~335 (1986)
  19. Hillert, D. G, "Spared access to idiomatic and literal meanings: A single-case approach", Brain and Language, 89, pp.207~215 (2004)
  20. Hogaboam T. W, "Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14, pp.265~274 (1975)
  21. Holley-Wilcox, P, "Evidence for multiple access in the processing of isolated words", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, pp.75~84 (1980)
  22. Holmes, V. M, "Prior context and the perception of lexically ambiguous sentences", Memory and Cognition, 5, pp.103~110 (1977)
  23. Holmes, V. M, "Accessing ambiguous words during sentence comprehension", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, pp.13~35 (1979)
  24. Kempsen, R. M, "Semantics Theory" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  25. Lucas, M. M, "Frequency effects on the processing of ambiguous word in sentence context", Language and Speech, 30, pp.25~46 (1987)
  26. Lyon, J, "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  27. Marslen-Wilson, W. W, "Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition", Cognition, 25, pp.71~102 (1987)
  28. Martin, C, "Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, pp.813~839 (1999)
  29. McClelland, J. L, "The case of interactionism in language processing in Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading" (1987), Erlbaum
  30. Oden, G. L, "Influence of context on the activation and selection of ambiguous word senses", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, pp.51~64 (1983)
  31. Olson, N J. N, "Completion and verification of ambiguous sentences", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, pp.457~470 (1974)
  32. Onifer W, "Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias", Memory & Cognition, 15, pp.73~87 (1981)
  33. Paul, S, "Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, pp.703~717 (1992)
  34. Rayner, K, "Contextual strength and the subordinate bias effect: Comment on Martin, Vu, Kellas, and Metcalf", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, pp.841~852 (1999)
  35. Rayner, K, "Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, pp.779~790 (1989)
  36. Rayner, K, "Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations", Journal of Memory and Language, 33, pp.527~544 (1994)
  37. Schvaneveldt, R. W, "Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition in Human Perception and Performance", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, pp.243~256 (1976)
  38. Seidenberg, M. S, "Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing", Cognitive Psychology, 14, pp.489~537 (1982)
  39. Simpson, G. B, "Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, pp.120~136 (1981)
  40. Simpson, G. B, "Context and the processing of ambiguous words in Handbook of Psycholinguistics" (1994), Academic Press
  41. Simpson, G. B, "Processing lexical ambiguity: A chronometric analysis", paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society (1982)
  42. Swinney, D. A, "Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re) consideration of context effects", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 18, pp.645~659 (1979)
  43. Swinney,D.A, "The resolution of indeterminacy during language comprehension:Perspectives on modularity in lexical,structural and pragmatic process in Understanding Word and Sentence" (1991), Elsevier
  44. Tanenhaus, M. K, "Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, pp.427~440 (1979)
  45. Williams, J. N, "Processing polysemous words in context: Evidence for interrelated meanings", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, pp.193~218 (1992)
  46. Yu, G, "Semantic activation and cortical areas related to the lexical ambiguity and idiomatic ambiguity", Neural Information Processing. LNCS4232, 290~297 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

한글 시각 단어재인 시의 동음이의어 이득 효과: 어휘판단과제로부터의 증거임채영, 최원일언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2023 · 제104호문장맥락에서 한국어 다의동사의 의미처리신현정, 안은혜, 오지향, 최민경한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2010 · 제17권 제1호한국어 시․청각 동음동철이의 어절 재인에 나타나는 어휘-의미 상호작용강귀영, 김준우, 김현경, 남기춘, 남현민, 신지영, 유도영, 전인서한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2021 · 제13권 제1호한국어 다의동사의 표상신현정, 최미영, 최민경한국인지및생물심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물2004 · 제16권 제2호한국어 동형이의어와 단어접근 모형비교: 청각 단어 판단과제의 반응자료 시간 중심으로김성아한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2009 · 제25권 제2호한국어 문장 읽기 시 동철동음어 처리: 안구운동 추적연구이상민, 최원일한국언어학회 · 언어2024 · 제49권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)

The Effect of the Number of Clusters on Speech Recognition with Clustering by ART2/LBG이창영pp. 3-8잡음음성인식을 위한 음성개선 방식들의 성능 비교정용주pp. 9-14영어 강세 교정을 위한 주변 음 특징 차를 고려한 강조점 검출성원용, 유기선, 심성건pp. 15-22인공와우 이식자에서 Positive Peaked 청신경 복합활동전위허승덕pp. 25-30휴대용 음성 피드백 도구의 사용이 과기능적 음성 행동의 발생 빈도에 미치는 영향이무경pp. 31-36
원문 보기