1920년대 경성부 사회사업과 빈민‧주택조사의 정치성 - 민족주의 정치세력의 정치기획을 중심으로 -
Political nature of the social work in Seoul and survey on the poor and housing in 1920s - Mainly with the political planning of nationalism political power -
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The ‘Rice Riots of 1918’ in Japan and the March 1st Movement in 1919 were the incidents revealed the problem of the administration of the Japanese Empire. As the gap between the rich and the poor had been increased due to the industrialization during the First World War, the economic hardships of middle class and below were intensified. Due to rapid inflation for advance into the Manchuria, speculators in rice appeared in Chosun and Japan, and the asymmetric balance between the accumulation of capital and the stabilization of livelihood has been broken. The public’s resistance against the imperalism led to proletarian revolution theory as well as social discourse requiring political unity. The nationalism political power which appeared through limitedly opened public sphere in 1920s was dominating hegemony of public sphere more opened compared to the past while showing vigilance against proletarian revolution of socialism group. The issues like poor people and housing problem in Keijyo (Seoul) were threatening the stability of Korean people as well as emphasizing the problem of colonization. Moreover, in 1920s, the suvival issue of Koreans became public for the first time due to depression, and the social work began to create friction against individual’s profit seeking activities. This thesis will study the contents of social work conducted in Keijyo (Seoul), and the direction of interpretation for survey on the poor and housing produced in the course of the social work. Generally, various social surveys and knowledge conducted to ease the crisis of regime are accepted as objective indexes to understand the situation, and it suggests reasonable basis for social decision making. Therefore, consideration on how the public sphere of Koreans could handle these issues has the meaning to explore the relationship between the survival, public interest, nationalism political power and colonization.
Abstract
The ‘Rice Riots of 1918’ in Japan and the March 1st Movement in 1919 were the incidents revealed the problem of the administration of the Japanese Empire. As the gap between the rich and the poor had been increased due to the industrialization during the First World War, the economic hardships of middle class and below were intensified. Due to rapid inflation for advance into the Manchuria, speculators in rice appeared in Chosun and Japan, and the asymmetric balance between the accumulation of capital and the stabilization of livelihood has been broken. The public’s resistance against the imperalism led to proletarian revolution theory as well as social discourse requiring political unity. The nationalism political power which appeared through limitedly opened public sphere in 1920s was dominating hegemony of public sphere more opened compared to the past while showing vigilance against proletarian revolution of socialism group. The issues like poor people and housing problem in Keijyo (Seoul) were threatening the stability of Korean people as well as emphasizing the problem of colonization. Moreover, in 1920s, the suvival issue of Koreans became public for the first time due to depression, and the social work began to create friction against individual’s profit seeking activities. This thesis will study the contents of social work conducted in Keijyo (Seoul), and the direction of interpretation for survey on the poor and housing produced in the course of the social work. Generally, various social surveys and knowledge conducted to ease the crisis of regime are accepted as objective indexes to understand the situation, and it suggests reasonable basis for social decision making. Therefore, consideration on how the public sphere of Koreans could handle these issues has the meaning to explore the relationship between the survival, public interest, nationalism political power and colonization.
참고문헌 (27)
- 京城府, "京城府內社會事業槪況", ~ (1923)
- 京城府, "京城府社會事業要覽", ~ (1929)
- 京城府, "京城府社會事業要覽", ~ (1932)
- "東亞日報", ~
- "每日申報", ~
- "弟40回 貴族院 日本興業銀行法中 改正法律案 外 1健 特別委員會議事速記錄 弟1號", ~
- "朝鮮各道府郡 臨時恩賜金由來及其の事業槪要", 植民地社會事業關係資料集.朝鮮編, ~
- "中外日報", ~
- 최정운, "지식국가론: 영국, 프랑스, 미국에서의 노동통계발달의 정치적 의미" (1992), 삼성출판사
- 홍기주, "하버마스와 현대철학" (1999), UUP
- 富田愛二郞, "日本社會事業の發展" (1942), 巖松堂書店
- 愼英弘, "近代朝鮮社會事業史硏究" (1984), 綠蔭書房
- 김백영, "식민지 도시계획을 둘러싼 식민 권력의 균열과 갈등: 1920년대 ‘대경성(大京城)계획’을 중심으로", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (67), pp.84~128 (2005), 한국사회사학회
- 송치호, "일제시기 조선사회사업협회의 성격에 대한 실증분석 : '식민지배 도구적 성격'을 중심으로", 석사, 사회복지학, pp.2007
- 김윤희, "1910년대 일본제국의회 속기록에 나타난 조선은행(권)의 성격, 팽창과 위험의 연쇄", 한일관계사연구, (47), pp.131~165 (2014), 한일관계사학회
- 김윤희, "근대 서울의 숲, 위험관리와 민족주의 정치기획- 공론화된 숲의 장소성을 중심으로 -", 사학연구, (111), pp.83~124 (2013), 한국사학회
- 김인수, "식민지 지식국가론 : 1930년대 ‘조선사회성격논쟁’에 대한 재고", 한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집, 12 (2012)
- 김인호, "합방의 콩고물, 임시은사금", 인간과 문화연구, 17 (2010)
- 渡邊彰, "京城人口에 關한 硏究", 朝鮮佛敎叢報, 15 (1919)
- 박세훈, "구제와 교화 - 일제 시기 경성부의 방면 위원 제도 연구", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (61), pp.4~155 (2002), 한국사회사학회
- 박이택, "식민지 조선의 공설일용품시장과 가격규제체계", 경제발전연구, 17(2), pp.201~233 (2011), 한국경제발전학회
- 배민재, "1910년대 조선총독부 임시은사금사업의 운영방향과 그 실제", 석사, 국사학, pp.2008
- 유승희, "1920~1930년대 경성부 주택문제의 전개와 대책", 아태연구, 19(2), pp.131~164 (2012), 국제지역연구원
- 尹晸郁, "近代日本の植民地朝鮮に於ける社會事業政策硏究", 박사, pp.1995
- 전성현, "1920년 전후 조선 상업회의소와 조선 산업정책의 확립", 역사와경계, (58), pp.167~202 (2006), 부산경남사학회
- 조성은, "근대 사회사업 개념과 담론에 관한 연구 : 1920년대와 1930년대를 중심으로", 박사, 사회복지학과, pp.2012
- 최장집, "지식국가론-영국, 프랑스, 미국에서의 노동통계발달의 정치적 의미", 한국정치학회보, 26(1) (1992)
