본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1930년대 초반 생활물가 동향과 물가 인하 운동

The trend of living price and a cut-the-price movement in the early 1930s

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This study starts from a critical mind that a study on prices during the Great Depression was concentrated in the macroscopic part as a financial policy and the condition of the public's everyday life was not apparent concretely. The main contents of the study is to investigate the colonial population characteristics and nature of the price cuts price movement of life policies. First, the Japanese imperialism were making the price policy without considering the particularities of the Joseon. Japanese imperialism, a price-control policy is basically a Japanese government's economic policy based on the organization and Korean industrial characteristics, given the austerity by not unilaterally, the local industry slumped. Second, the Japanese imperialists were neglected commodity price adjustment. Japanese imperialism was little attempt to regulate commodity prices. But it was great to have regional disparities. And it was not comprehensive measures. Japanese imperialism was aware of not a big problem the dissatisfaction of the people for commodity prices If it is not enough to be a security threat Awards. Because it is not a colonial power is not a power to be influenced by the public authority based on agreement. The public had difficulty living because commodity price adjustment policy is not enforced. So they were participated in a cut-the-price movement. Price indicators are low but declining prices did not fall at all. Therefore, the opinion was that the price adjustment is necessary composition. It was led by the forces of the movement of the local potentate such as nationalism, socialism activist. Each force was to serve as instruments in their respective forces could seek to expand through price-based understanding of the issues involved and the entire local community. In particular, Political space that local elections and price cuts that are exercises have been conducted closely related. Japanese imperialism did not interfere significantly lowered prices for the exercise. However, exercise is filed items related to governance policies, or highlight a particular social movement forces would thoroughly blocked. This shows the position of the colonial power for living inflation. Exercise price cuts are meant to publicize socially a 'living inflation. And what was this movement that mobilized in the community was able to somewhat restrain inflation flow. The limitation of this movement will not go forth to criticize the governing policy. In addition it did not cut prices to monopoly capitalist management. This movement is stopped at a little people ever living area advocacy.

Abstract

This study starts from a critical mind that a study on prices during the Great Depression was concentrated in the macroscopic part as a financial policy and the condition of the public's everyday life was not apparent concretely. The main contents of the study is to investigate the colonial population characteristics and nature of the price cuts price movement of life policies. First, the Japanese imperialism were making the price policy without considering the particularities of the Joseon. Japanese imperialism, a price-control policy is basically a Japanese government's economic policy based on the organization and Korean industrial characteristics, given the austerity by not unilaterally, the local industry slumped. Second, the Japanese imperialists were neglected commodity price adjustment. Japanese imperialism was little attempt to regulate commodity prices. But it was great to have regional disparities. And it was not comprehensive measures. Japanese imperialism was aware of not a big problem the dissatisfaction of the people for commodity prices If it is not enough to be a security threat Awards. Because it is not a colonial power is not a power to be influenced by the public authority based on agreement. The public had difficulty living because commodity price adjustment policy is not enforced. So they were participated in a cut-the-price movement. Price indicators are low but declining prices did not fall at all. Therefore, the opinion was that the price adjustment is necessary composition. It was led by the forces of the movement of the local potentate such as nationalism, socialism activist. Each force was to serve as instruments in their respective forces could seek to expand through price-based understanding of the issues involved and the entire local community. In particular, Political space that local elections and price cuts that are exercises have been conducted closely related. Japanese imperialism did not interfere significantly lowered prices for the exercise. However, exercise is filed items related to governance policies, or highlight a particular social movement forces would thoroughly blocked. This shows the position of the colonial power for living inflation. Exercise price cuts are meant to publicize socially a 'living inflation. And what was this movement that mobilized in the community was able to somewhat restrain inflation flow. The limitation of this movement will not go forth to criticize the governing policy. In addition it did not cut prices to monopoly capitalist management. This movement is stopped at a little people ever living area advocacy.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 朝鮮總督府內務局社會科, "朝鮮に於る公設市場", ~ (1930)
  2. 京城府, "京城府公設市場要覽", ~ (1936)
  3. 朝鮮總督府農林局, "朝鮮米穀要覽", ~ (1940)
  4. 朝鮮及滿洲社, "朝鮮及滿洲", 264호ㆍ276호ㆍ285호ㆍ296호ㆍ299호ㆍ303호, ~
  5. 朝鮮總督府高等法院檢事局, "사상월보", ~ (1931)
  6. 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮文朝鮮", ~ (1930)
  7. "동아일보", ~
  8. "매일신보", ~
  9. "신민", ~
  10. "별건곤", 38호ㆍ61호, ~
  11. "혜성", 2권 2호, ~ (1932)
  12. "동방평론", 1호, ~ (1932)
  13. 서정익, "일본근대경제사" (2003), 혜안
  14. 이여성, "숫자조선연구 4집" (1933)
  15. 경제기획원, "물가와 국민생활", ~ (1982)
  16. 조동걸, "일제하한국농민운동사" (1979), 한길사
  17. 한국학중앙연구원, "한국민족문화대백과사전", ~ (1995)
  18. 정연태, "식민권력과 한국 농업" (2014), 서울대학교출판문화원
  19. 김경림, "1920년대 전기사업 부영화운동 : 평양전기 부영화를 중심으로", 백산학보, (46) (1996)
  20. 김재훈, "1925-31년 쌀값하락과 부채불황의 구조", 한국경제연구, 15, pp.227~260 (2005), 한국경제연구학회
  21. 김제정, "1930년대 초반 경성지역 전기사업 부영화운동", 한국사론, 43 (2000)
  22. 박이택, "식민지 조선의 공설일용품시장과 가격규제체계", 경제발전연구, 17(2), pp.201~233 (2011), 한국경제발전학회
  23. 小林英夫, "1930년대 민족해방운동" (1984), 거름
  24. 孫禎睦, "日帝强占期의 道廳移輾-過程과 結果(1) : -京畿ㆍ咸北ㆍ平北道廳의 移輾-", 論文集, 18 (1984)
  25. 염복규, "1920년대 후반-30년대 전반 차지?차가인운동의 조직화양상과 전개과정", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (73), pp.75~105 (2007), 한국사회사학회
  26. 이병례, "경제불황기 정리해고와 노동자의 대응", 역사비평, (90), pp.129~155 (2010), 역사문제연구소
  27. 이혜인, "1930년대 전반 조선 미곡정책과 재조선일본인의 식민자본 ― ‘조선미곡창고주식회사’를 중심으로 ―", 사림, (52), pp.241~271 (2015), 수선사학회
  28. 전강수, "농업공황기의 미곡ㆍ미가정책에 관한 연구-植民地米 移(出)入 통제정책을 중심으로-", 경제사학, 13(1) (1989)
  29. 지수걸, "일제하 공주지역 유지집단의 도청이전 반대운동(1930. 11~1932. 10)", 역사와 현실, 20 (1996)
  30. 최병택, "1920년대 말~1930년대 전반기 조선총독부의 미곡창고 설립과 그 운영의 변화", 역사교육, (130), pp.205~233 (2014), 역사교육연구회
  31. 하명화, "1920~30년대 초 도시 주거문제와 주거권 확보운동", 지역과 역사, (12), pp.205~243 (2003), 부경역사연구소
  32. 한상구, "일제시기 지역주민운동 연구 : 지역 주민대회를 중심으로", 박사, 국사학과, pp.2013
  33. 허수열, "일제하 실질임금(변동)추계", 경제사학, 5(1) (1981)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)