본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1932년 일본의 재상해한인 체포활동과 프랑스조계당국의 대응

A Study on the Shanghai French Concession Authorities’ Response to Japanese Empire’s Apprehension of Shanghai-Koreans in 1932

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

On April 29, 1932, Yun Bong Gil threw a bomb at the Hongkou Park(the present name is Lu Xun Park). Major figures in Japanese Empire’s politics and military were killed or wounded in the incident. After Yun Bong Gil’s Shanghai heroic deed, Japanese Empire’s extensive apprehension of Shanghai-Koreans started. At that time, most Shanghai-Koreans were living in Shanghai French concession. Therefore, the apprehension requires the French concession authorities’ cooperation essentially. French concession authorities showed cooperative attitude towards apprehension right after the incident. However, their attitude has changed uncooperatively as of May 5. The truce agreement, which was down to Shanghai Incident in 28th of January, was concluded between China and Japan at that day. This article shows French concession authorities’ response to Japanese Empire’s apprehension of Shanghai-Koreans and the reason for that response. Firstly, the details of cooperation which explain how the French concession authorities cooperate will be described. The reason of their cooperation and what caused them to behave uncooperatively will be discussed afterwards.

Abstract

On April 29, 1932, Yun Bong Gil threw a bomb at the Hongkou Park(the present name is Lu Xun Park). Major figures in Japanese Empire’s politics and military were killed or wounded in the incident. After Yun Bong Gil’s Shanghai heroic deed, Japanese Empire’s extensive apprehension of Shanghai-Koreans started. At that time, most Shanghai-Koreans were living in Shanghai French concession. Therefore, the apprehension requires the French concession authorities’ cooperation essentially. French concession authorities showed cooperative attitude towards apprehension right after the incident. However, their attitude has changed uncooperatively as of May 5. The truce agreement, which was down to Shanghai Incident in 28th of January, was concluded between China and Japan at that day. This article shows French concession authorities’ response to Japanese Empire’s apprehension of Shanghai-Koreans and the reason for that response. Firstly, the details of cooperation which explain how the French concession authorities cooperate will be described. The reason of their cooperation and what caused them to behave uncooperatively will be discussed afterwards.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. "동아일보", ~
  2. "사상월보 2권 11호", ~ (1933)
  3. 국회도서관, "한국민족운동사료 (중국편)" (1976), 國會圖書館
  4. 대한민국임시정부기념사업회, "프랑스 소재 한국독립운동자료집 Ⅰ", 대한민국임시정부기념사업회, ~ (2006)
  5. 국가보훈처, "프랑스 외무부 문서보관소 소장 한국독립운동 사료 1", 국사편찬위원회, ~ (2015)
  6. 국가보훈처, "프랑스 외무부 문서보관소 소장 한국독립운동 사료 3", 국사편찬위원회ㆍ국가보훈처, ~ (2016)
  7. "대한민국임시정부자료집 한국애국단 Ⅰ(활동 관련 자료) 28권"[URL]
  8. "대한민국임시정부자료집 한국애국단 Ⅱ(보도기사) 29권"[URL]
  9. "朝鮮人ノ支那国帰化問題ニ関スル先例" (1932)[URL]
  10. "日本憲兵及警察官ノ上海仏国租界侵入捜査事件 In 最近支那関係諸問題摘要 上巻" (1932)[URL]
  11. "不逞鮮人ノ桜田門外大逆事件及上海虹口公園爆弾投擲事件, In 最近支那関係諸問題摘要 下巻" (1932)[URL]
  12. "SHANGHAI NOIRE 635PO", A 137
  13. 손과지, "상해한인사회사 : 1910-1945" (2001), 한울아카데미
  14. 孫安石, "一九二〇年代、上海の朝鮮人コミュニティ研究", 박사, pp.1998
  15. 朱晓明, "上海法租界的警察 1910年-1937年", 박사, pp.2012
  16. 김광재, "1910~20년대 상해 한인과 조계 공간", 역사학보, (228), pp.351~384 (2015), 역사학회[DOI]
  17. 김도형, "도산 안창호의 ‘여행권’을 통해 본 독립운동 행적", 한국독립운동사연구, (52), pp.35~63 (2015), 한국독립운동사연구소
  18. 신용하, "대한민국임시정부 수립 80주년 기념논문집 하" (1999), 국가보훈처
  19. 이명화, "도산 안창호의 서대문형무소 투옥과 수감 생활", 한국독립운동사연구, (46), pp.171~218 (2013), 한국독립운동사연구소
  20. 이재령, "1・28 상하이사변과 윤봉길의거의 한중공동항전", 군사, (98), pp.241~284 (2016), 국방부군사편찬연구소
  21. 이현희, "한인애국단의 작탄의거", 사총, 31 (1987)
  22. 한시준, "도산 안창호의 피체와 석방운동", 역사학보, (210), pp.203~227 (2011), 역사학회
  23. 한시준, "대한민국 임시정부와 프랑스", 한국근현대사연구, (77), pp.128~152 (2016), 한국근현대사학회
  24. 武井義和, "戰前上海における朝鮮人の国籍問題", 中国硏究月報, 60(1) (2006)
  25. 高綱博文, "外務省警察から見た上海の朝鮮人コミュニティ- 上海天長節爆弾テロ事件をめぐって", 歴史学研究, 860 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)