3･1운동 직후 한인의 상해 망명에 대한 프랑스 조계당국의 인식과 대응
Response of French Concession Authorities about Korean Political Asylums in Shanghai after the March 1st Movement(1919)
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article analyzes how the French Concession authorities perceived Koreans who came to Shanghai after the March 1st Movement. French concession authorities did not consider Koreans to be immigrants. It recognized the Koreans as political asylum who had escaped Japanese Rule and Suppression. Therefore, the Korean policy of French Concession authorities was applied to based on the principle of non-extradition of political offenders, the anti-Japanese public opinion of the Shanghai Chinese society at that time, and diplomatic judgment. It was also to establish a reciprocal principle between France and Japan for the extradition of political offenses. France demanded that Japan take the same action against Vietnamese revolutionists in Tokyo when Koreans political offenders hand over to Japan authorities. It also restricted the activities of Koreans living in the French concession in Shanghai. A radical independence movement was prohibited, but, the diplomatic independence movement, which appeals to the public opinion of the World Powers for independence, positively conceived as “peaceful activity.”
Abstract
This article analyzes how the French Concession authorities perceived Koreans who came to Shanghai after the March 1st Movement. French concession authorities did not consider Koreans to be immigrants. It recognized the Koreans as political asylum who had escaped Japanese Rule and Suppression. Therefore, the Korean policy of French Concession authorities was applied to based on the principle of non-extradition of political offenders, the anti-Japanese public opinion of the Shanghai Chinese society at that time, and diplomatic judgment. It was also to establish a reciprocal principle between France and Japan for the extradition of political offenses. France demanded that Japan take the same action against Vietnamese revolutionists in Tokyo when Koreans political offenders hand over to Japan authorities. It also restricted the activities of Koreans living in the French concession in Shanghai. A radical independence movement was prohibited, but, the diplomatic independence movement, which appeals to the public opinion of the World Powers for independence, positively conceived as “peaceful activity.”
참고문헌 (27)
- 대한민국임시정부자료집 편찬위원회, "대한민국임시정부자료집 23 대유럽외교", 국사편찬위원회, ~ (2008)
- 대한민국임시정부자료집 편찬위원회, "대한민국임시정부자료집 24 대유럽외교", 국사편찬위원회, ~ (2010)
- 대한민국임시정부자료집 편찬위원회, "대한민국임시정부자료집 39 중국보도기사", 국사편찬위원회, ~ (2010)
- "不逞團關係雜件-鮮人의 部-在上海地方 1"[URL]
- 泉二新熊, "日本刑法論" (1915), 有斐閣
- 岡田朝太郎, "刑法論" (1927), 中外印刷出版部
- 도진순, "백범일지" (2009), 돌베개
- 조봉암, "내가 걸어온 길", 황해문화, 23 (1999)
- 석원화, "중국언론 신보(申報)에 그려진 한국근현대사" (2010), 역사공간
- 강덕상, "여운형과 상해임시정부-망명정부의 존립을 위한 고투" (2017), 선인
- 김광재, "근현대 상해 한인사 연구" (2018)
- 나가타 아키후미, "일본의 조선통치와 국제관계: 조선독립운동과 미국 1910~1922" (2008), 일조각
- 류후이우, "상해현대사" (2018), 경인문화사
- 손과지, "상해한인사회사 1910-1945" (2001), 한울아카데미
- 알렉시스 더든, "일본의 한국 식민지화 담론과 권력" (2013), 늘품플러스
- 유인선, "새로 쓴 베트남의 역사" (2016), 이산
- 孫安石, "一九二年代、上海の朝鮮人コミュニティ研究", 박사, pp.1998
- 강건인, "정치범 불인도의 원칙", 현대사상연구, 6 (1995)
- 김명섭, "대한민국 임시정부는 왜 상해 프랑스조계에 수립되었나?", 국제정치논총, 58(4), pp.179~214 (2018), 한국국제정치학회
- 반병률, "일제초기 독립운동노선 논쟁-급진론과 완진론", 동양정치사상사, 5(2) (2006)
- 신효승, "1919년 파리 강화회의와 김규식의 외교 독립운동", 역사와 실학, (69), pp.375~412 (2019), 역사실학회
- 윤종문, "1920년대 프랑스의 상하이 한인 독립운동에 대한 정책과 그 성격", 한국근현대사연구, (79), pp.149~184 (2016), 한국근현대사학회
- 이만희, "犯罪人引渡와 政治犯不引渡", 법조, 43(10) (1994)
- 이한울, "상해판 『독립신문』과 안창호", 역사와 현실, (76), pp.325~357 (2010), 한국역사연구회
- 정상천, "일제강점기(1910-1945)동안의 한국독립운동에 대한 프랑스 정부의 정책", 한국정치외교사논총, 26(2), pp.219~252 (2005), 한국정치외교사학회
- 한시준, "대한민국 임시정부와 프랑스", 한국근현대사연구, (77), pp.128~152 (2016), 한국근현대사학회
- 홍기갑, "국제법상 범죄인 인도", 원광법학, 24(2), pp.109~128 (2008), 법학연구소