본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신라 중대의 의례 수용과 운영

The Acceptance and Operation of Rites in the Middle Period of Silla

1

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Rites operated on various religious levels in ancient Korean societies. The maintenance of order through shamanistic rites, or confirmation of power through Buddhist rites after acceptance of Buddhism is an example of the operation. Rites played major role in justifying the power of the ruling class by connoting political meaning as well as religious meaning. Furthermore, rites operated for monopolizing and strengthening king's power within the ruling class. In particular, the Three Kingdoms accepted various culture and institutions, which can support the national system that places king at the pinnacle of power, institutionally or ideologically through relations with China and settled them depending on the conditions of each country. In the case of Silla, promulgation of the Yulryeong(律令) and the acquirement of the Confucianism that supports it are the examples. This article focuses on the beginning of the New Year's Greetings(賀正禮) implemented during the Queen Jindeok's reign. It was an important starting point for visibly presenting the vertical relationship between king and vassal, central and local in accordance with the rules of Confucian rites by actively accepting the system of Tang. This article also paid attention to an official in charge of rites including the Yebu, an official for performing and operating rites. In particular, the system of Yebu was completed through the reign of King Jinpyeong to King Munmu, and it operated similar function as that of Sui or Tang. The function of Yebu of Tang was centered on rites, sacrificial rites, and selection, and that of Silla was not much different. In case of Tang, Sabu which was belonged to Yebu was in charge of sacrificial rites, water clock, and duties concerning Buddhism and Taoism. However, in case of Silla, Jeonsaseo was responsible only for sacrificial rites, Daedoseo was set by separating Buddhism-related matters, and the work related to the water clock was organized for independent official which was not belonged to Yebu. Gukjagam was belonged to Yebu in Silla, whereas it was an independent official in Tang, and this shows a different status from that of Tang. In particular, the fact that national rite system of Silla differs from Tang also shows that the actual operation aspect was different from Tang. This article consequently shows that while the Gukhak, which is responsible for the education of the Confucian scriptures of Silla, was under Yebu and it expressed its operation based on the Confucian rule of rite, but the actual operation had to be operated by a system in which Buddhist rites coexisted with the rite system based on existing indigenous religions.

Abstract

Rites operated on various religious levels in ancient Korean societies. The maintenance of order through shamanistic rites, or confirmation of power through Buddhist rites after acceptance of Buddhism is an example of the operation. Rites played major role in justifying the power of the ruling class by connoting political meaning as well as religious meaning. Furthermore, rites operated for monopolizing and strengthening king's power within the ruling class. In particular, the Three Kingdoms accepted various culture and institutions, which can support the national system that places king at the pinnacle of power, institutionally or ideologically through relations with China and settled them depending on the conditions of each country. In the case of Silla, promulgation of the Yulryeong(律令) and the acquirement of the Confucianism that supports it are the examples. This article focuses on the beginning of the New Year's Greetings(賀正禮) implemented during the Queen Jindeok's reign. It was an important starting point for visibly presenting the vertical relationship between king and vassal, central and local in accordance with the rules of Confucian rites by actively accepting the system of Tang. This article also paid attention to an official in charge of rites including the Yebu, an official for performing and operating rites. In particular, the system of Yebu was completed through the reign of King Jinpyeong to King Munmu, and it operated similar function as that of Sui or Tang. The function of Yebu of Tang was centered on rites, sacrificial rites, and selection, and that of Silla was not much different. In case of Tang, Sabu which was belonged to Yebu was in charge of sacrificial rites, water clock, and duties concerning Buddhism and Taoism. However, in case of Silla, Jeonsaseo was responsible only for sacrificial rites, Daedoseo was set by separating Buddhism-related matters, and the work related to the water clock was organized for independent official which was not belonged to Yebu. Gukjagam was belonged to Yebu in Silla, whereas it was an independent official in Tang, and this shows a different status from that of Tang. In particular, the fact that national rite system of Silla differs from Tang also shows that the actual operation aspect was different from Tang. This article consequently shows that while the Gukhak, which is responsible for the education of the Confucian scriptures of Silla, was under Yebu and it expressed its operation based on the Confucian rule of rite, but the actual operation had to be operated by a system in which Buddhist rites coexisted with the rite system based on existing indigenous religions.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. "三國史記", ~
  2. "三國遺事", ~
  3. "舊唐書", ~
  4. "新唐書", ~
  5. "唐六典", ~
  6. 井上光貞, "律令" (1976), 岩波書店
  7. 黑板勝美, "令義解" (1983), 吉川弘文館
  8. 虎尾俊哉, "延喜式" (2000), 集英社
  9. 김영하, "신라중대사회연구" (2007), 일지사
  10. 나희라, "신라의 국가제사" (2003), 지식산업사
  11. 이기백, "新羅政治社會史硏究" (1974), 일조각
  12. 이범직, "韓國中世禮思想硏究 : 五禮를 中心으로" (1991), 一潮閣
  13. 이인철, "新羅政治制度史硏究" (1993), 일지사
  14. 와타나베 신이치로, "天空의 玉座-중국 고대제국의 조정과 의례" (2002), 신서원
  15. 주보돈, "신라 국학과 인재 양성" (2015), 민속원
  16. 캐서린 벨, "의례의 이해" (2007), 한신대학교 출판부
  17. 하일식, "신라 집권 관료제 연구" (2006), 혜안
  18. 채미하, "신라 국가제사와 왕권" (2008), 혜안
  19. 채미하, "신라의 오례와 왕권" (2015), 혜안
  20. 김정식, "唐 玄宗朝 國家儀禮書의 편찬과 그 특징", 동방학, (33), pp.371~404 (2015), 동양고전연구소
  21. 김수태, "(李基白先生古稀紀念)韓國史學論叢" (1994), 일조각
  22. 김창석, "통일신라의 천하관과 대일(對日) 인식", 역사와 현실, (56), pp.143~171 (2005), 한국역사연구회
  23. 박남수, "신라 大道署의 정비과정과 僧政體系의 변화", 한국사상사학, (44), pp.125~164 (2013), 한국사상사학회
  24. 박수정, "『三國史記』 職官志 硏究", 박사, pp.2016
  25. 윤선태, "新羅 中代의 成典寺院과 國家儀禮-大・中・小祀의 祭場과 관련하여", 신라문화제학술발표논문집, 23 (2002)
  26. 이영호, "新羅 國學의 成立과 變遷", 역사교육논집, (57), pp.69~109 (2015), 역사교육학회[DOI]
  27. 이현주, "新羅倭典의 성격", 한국사론, 61 (2015)
  28. 林起煥, "報德國考", 강좌한국고대사, 10 (2003), 가락국사적개발연구원
  29. 전덕재, "8세기 신라의 대일외교와 동아시아 인식", 日本學硏究, 44, pp.27~50 (2015), 일본연구소
  30. 채미하, "신라 중대 오례와 왕권-오례 수용을 중심으로-", 한국사상사학, (27), pp.127~165 (2006), 한국사상사학회
  31. 채미하, "한국 고대의 宮中儀禮 - 卽位禮와 朝賀禮를 중심으로 -", 사학연구, (112), pp.1~40 (2013), 한국사학회
  32. 채미하, "신라의 冊封儀禮와 그 기능", 사학연구, (127), pp.55~96 (2017), 한국사학회
  33. 최광식, "新羅 國家祭祀의 체계와 성격", 한국사연구, (118), pp.4~134 (2002), 한국사연구회
  34. 한준수, "新羅 眞德王代 唐制의 受容과 체제정비", 한국학논총, 34, pp.309~352 (2010), 한국학연구소
  35. 한영화, "신라 사면의 의례와 공간", 역사와 현실, (94), pp.75~112 (2014), 한국역사연구회
  36. 한영화, "신라의 지배 공간의 확장과 제의의 통합", 역사와 담론, (89), pp.1~41 (2019), 호서사학회
  37. 三池賢一, "新羅內廷官制考(上)", 朝鮮學報, 61 (1971)
  38. 三池賢一, "新羅內廷官制考(下)", 朝鮮學報, 62 (1972)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)