신라 중대의 의례공간과 국정회의
Ritual Space and Official Gathering for Dynastic Governance in the Middle Period of Silla
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Entering the middle period, Silla emphasized the importance of rituals based on Confucianism. In addition, a huge change was brought to the location or space where the rituals were practiced. In particular that the rituals resulted in the structural change of the Silla palace. Rituals also had a profound influence on the political institutional elements, which is a matter regarding Council of state affairs. With the acceptance of rituals at the end of the middle period of Silla, it is a reasonable understanding to see that the Council of state affairs was held at Chowonjeon, the building in the palace. The fact that the council also took place in the four sacred places outside the royal palace proves that the council of state affairs was held in the ritual space outside the royal palace. It would be difficult to believe that the council of state affairs took place in the areas outside of the royal capital, where the Confucian political system was implemented in space. It is noteworthy because this demonstrates that various types of the council have been held in relation to the ritual space. The first type among the council of state affairs during the middle period of Silla, is a council where the king and his servants gather together to discuss about dynastic governance. Another is one of the noble councils called Hwabeak. This is also called as Gunsin councill or the Baekgwan of state affairs regarding all the government officials. Like this, it seems that there was a noble council in which only a small number of people participated, as opposed to the enlargement of participation in the noble gatherings. A Council of Daesin can be included in such an aritocratic meeting. Council of Jaesang can be assumed as an aristocratic conference in which fewer number of nobles participate. The fact that there were many forms of council demonstrate that through these councils of state affairs, the royal authority was even more strengthened during the middle period of Silla. It is clear that the nobles who participated in those councils of state affairs would have become more bureaucratic.
Abstract
Entering the middle period, Silla emphasized the importance of rituals based on Confucianism. In addition, a huge change was brought to the location or space where the rituals were practiced. In particular that the rituals resulted in the structural change of the Silla palace. Rituals also had a profound influence on the political institutional elements, which is a matter regarding Council of state affairs. With the acceptance of rituals at the end of the middle period of Silla, it is a reasonable understanding to see that the Council of state affairs was held at Chowonjeon, the building in the palace. The fact that the council also took place in the four sacred places outside the royal palace proves that the council of state affairs was held in the ritual space outside the royal palace. It would be difficult to believe that the council of state affairs took place in the areas outside of the royal capital, where the Confucian political system was implemented in space. It is noteworthy because this demonstrates that various types of the council have been held in relation to the ritual space. The first type among the council of state affairs during the middle period of Silla, is a council where the king and his servants gather together to discuss about dynastic governance. Another is one of the noble councils called Hwabeak. This is also called as Gunsin councill or the Baekgwan of state affairs regarding all the government officials. Like this, it seems that there was a noble council in which only a small number of people participated, as opposed to the enlargement of participation in the noble gatherings. A Council of Daesin can be included in such an aritocratic meeting. Council of Jaesang can be assumed as an aristocratic conference in which fewer number of nobles participate. The fact that there were many forms of council demonstrate that through these councils of state affairs, the royal authority was even more strengthened during the middle period of Silla. It is clear that the nobles who participated in those councils of state affairs would have become more bureaucratic.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김수태, "신라중대정치사연구" (1996), 일조각
- 와타나베 신이치로, "천공의 옥좌" (2002), 신서원
- 이영호, "신라 중대의 정치와 권력구조" (2014), 지식산업사
- 채미하, "신라의 오례와 왕권" (2015), 혜안
- 한준수, "신라 중대 율령정치사연구" (2012), 서경문화사
- 이기백, "신라정치사회사연구" (1974), 일조각
- 이기동, "신라 중대의 관료제와 골품제", 진단학보, 50 (1980)
- 이기동, "한국사강좌, 고대편" (1982), 일조각
- 이인철, "신라의 군신회의와 재상제도", 한국학보, 65 (1991)
- 주보돈, "한국사회발전사론" (1992), 일조각
- 이기백, "한국고대정치사회사연구" (1996), 일조각
- 여호규, "新羅 都城의 空間構成과 王京制의 성립과정", 서울학연구, (18), pp.35~79 (2002), 서울학연구소
- 신형석, "6세기 신라 귀족회의와 그 성격", 국사관논총, 98 (2002)
- 朴南守, "新羅 和白會議에 관한 再檢討", 신라문화, (21), pp.314~342 (2003), 신라문화연구소
- 전덕재, "신라 화백회의의 성격과 그 변화", 역사학보, (182), pp.1~31 (2004), 역사학회
- 전덕재, "신라 왕궁의 배치양상과 그 변화", 신라문화제학술발표논문집, 27 (2006)
- 박남수, "신라화백회의 연구현황과 중층적 회의구조", 신라문화, (30), pp.29~72 (2007), 신라문화연구소
- 채미하, "한국 고대의 宮中儀禮 - 卽位禮와 朝賀禮를 중심으로 -", 사학연구, (112), pp.1~40 (2013), 한국사학회
- 여호규, "고구려 도성의 의례공간과 왕권의 위상", 한국고대사연구, (71), pp.55~96 (2013), 한국고대사학회
- 여호규, "6~8세기 신라 왕궁의 구조와 정무·의례 공간의 분화", 역사와 현실, (94), pp.33~74 (2014), 한국역사연구회
- 한영화, "신라 사면의 의례와 공간", 역사와 현실, (94), pp.75~112 (2014), 한국역사연구회
- 박대재, "新羅의 四靈地會議와 和白", 신라문화, 44, pp.261~294 (2014), 신라문화연구소
- 채미하, "신라의 嘉禮 수용과 運用", 한국고대사탐구, (18), pp.81~109 (2014), 한국고대사탐구학회[DOI]
- 박재우, "고려전기 宰樞의 출신과 국정회의에서의 위상", 동방학지, (172), pp.33~65 (2015), 국학연구원[DOI]
- 강종훈, "회의체", 신라의 통치제도, ~ (2016)
- 주보돈, "김춘추와 그의 사람들" (2018), 지식산업사
- 김수태, "신라사에서의 전제정치론과 왕권", 역사와 담론, (85), pp.1~47 (2018), 호서사학회
