본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신라 명산대천의 사전(祀典) 편제 이유와 특징

The Reasons for Incorporation of Noted Mountains and Large Streams in Sajeon and Their Characteristics

1

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine the reasons that noted mountains and large streams were incorporated into “sajeon (祀典),” and their characteristics. According to Samguksagi (the History of Three Kingdoms), the ritual places of the Shilla Kingdom included Samsan for large-scale rites and Oak, Sajin, Sahae, Sadok and Sogliak for medium-scale rites,and they took place in six other splendid mountains and rivers. For small rites, there were 24 mountains and rivers including Sangak and Seosool. The name of each place is also included in the records. The records indicate that the time when those noted mountains and large streams as “the ritual places” of the Shilla Kingdom were classified according to the scale of performed rites (large, medium, and small) is between the 5th year of King Shinmun’s rein and the 34th year of King Seongdeok’s rein, andit was after that time that Sangjoeumgeoseo was incorporated as a place for the medium-scale rites. Such scale-based classification of places for rites during the Shilla Kingdom is different from that of the Tang Dynasty. The primary reason why the Shilla’s royal families incorporated noted mountains and large streams as places for their small-, medium-, large-scale rites seems to be that they intended to reorganize the provincial forces which had been firmly rooted in places around the Shilla Kingdom. The rites performed in the noted mountains or rivers of each province were intended for the guardian deities of the province, and they were also closely related to the local influential families. In other words, the royal families during the middle period of the Shilla Kingdom used those locally performed rites to strengthen their centralized control system and organized them on a scale-place basis by accepting the Tang Dynasty’s national ritual system. It seems that this allowed the royal families to exercise domination over the provinces in the kingdom. However, as for the distribution of noted mountains and large streams among nine provinces, the only place for large-scale rites was the Royal capital, while the places for medium- and small-scale rites included the noted mountains and streams in the old territory of the Shilla Kingdom, as well as the capital. They are found more commonly than in the old territories of Goguryeo and Baekje Kingdoms. Furthermore, in Sabi, which once was the capital of the Baekje Kingdom, none of the noted mountains or streams is identified as place for any of small-, medium- or large-scale rites. Those mountains are located along the Sobaek Mountains or south-east of the range, except for Mt. Gyeryong, which was then also known as “seokak,” one of the five noted mountains. This suggests that the then Shilla Kingdom’s ruling classes had a strong tendency of thinking oriented towards the old days of the kingdom. In conclusion, although the mid-Shilla Kingdom’s royal families leverage their control over each province by means of the noted-mountains-and-streams-based rites, there was a limit in that they failed to go beyond their past-oriented thinking.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the reasons that noted mountains and large streams were incorporated into “sajeon (祀典),” and their characteristics. According to Samguksagi (the History of Three Kingdoms), the ritual places of the Shilla Kingdom included Samsan for large-scale rites and Oak, Sajin, Sahae, Sadok and Sogliak for medium-scale rites,and they took place in six other splendid mountains and rivers. For small rites, there were 24 mountains and rivers including Sangak and Seosool. The name of each place is also included in the records. The records indicate that the time when those noted mountains and large streams as “the ritual places” of the Shilla Kingdom were classified according to the scale of performed rites (large, medium, and small) is between the 5th year of King Shinmun’s rein and the 34th year of King Seongdeok’s rein, andit was after that time that Sangjoeumgeoseo was incorporated as a place for the medium-scale rites. Such scale-based classification of places for rites during the Shilla Kingdom is different from that of the Tang Dynasty. The primary reason why the Shilla’s royal families incorporated noted mountains and large streams as places for their small-, medium-, large-scale rites seems to be that they intended to reorganize the provincial forces which had been firmly rooted in places around the Shilla Kingdom. The rites performed in the noted mountains or rivers of each province were intended for the guardian deities of the province, and they were also closely related to the local influential families. In other words, the royal families during the middle period of the Shilla Kingdom used those locally performed rites to strengthen their centralized control system and organized them on a scale-place basis by accepting the Tang Dynasty’s national ritual system. It seems that this allowed the royal families to exercise domination over the provinces in the kingdom. However, as for the distribution of noted mountains and large streams among nine provinces, the only place for large-scale rites was the Royal capital, while the places for medium- and small-scale rites included the noted mountains and streams in the old territory of the Shilla Kingdom, as well as the capital. They are found more commonly than in the old territories of Goguryeo and Baekje Kingdoms. Furthermore, in Sabi, which once was the capital of the Baekje Kingdom, none of the noted mountains or streams is identified as place for any of small-, medium- or large-scale rites. Those mountains are located along the Sobaek Mountains or south-east of the range, except for Mt. Gyeryong, which was then also known as “seokak,” one of the five noted mountains. This suggests that the then Shilla Kingdom’s ruling classes had a strong tendency of thinking oriented towards the old days of the kingdom. In conclusion, although the mid-Shilla Kingdom’s royal families leverage their control over each province by means of the noted-mountains-and-streams-based rites, there was a limit in that they failed to go beyond their past-oriented thinking.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. "신궁의 설치를 통해 본 마립간시기의 신라" (1994)
  2. "고대한중외교사연구" (1997), 일조각
  3. "고려시대의 성황신앙과 지방통치 한국사연구 74" (1991)
  4. "고려시대의 산악신앙 진산한기두박사화갑기념 한국종교사상의 재조명" (1993)
  5. "신라 김알지신화의 형성과 신궁" (1994)
  6. "신라의 종묘와 명산대천의 제사", 52 (1999)
  7. "한국고대의 건국신화와 제의" (1999), 일조각
  8. "신라 중대정치사연구" (1996), 일조각
  9. "지리산 성모사에 就하여" (1939)
  10. "신라시대 대성군에 관한 고찰-신라왕도 주위의 소재 군현에 대한 일고찰-" (1987)
  11. "삼국사기 지리지 신라조의 사료적 검토, 삼국사기의 원전검토" (1995), 한국정신문화연구원
  12. "대가야의 세계와 道設智", 81 (1996)
  13. "신라의 국가제사" (2003), 지식산업사
  14. "백제의 동명신화와 동명묘 역사학연구10" (1981), 전남대학교 사학회
  15. "통일기 신라의 백제고지지배 한국고대사연구 1" (1988)
  16. "신라의 산악숭배와 산신 신라사상의 재조명-신라문화제학술발표회논문집- 제12집" (1992)
  17. "신라 중대 시조존숭 관념의 형성, 한국 고대의 고고와 역사" (1997), 학연문화사
  18. "신라 중대 정치세력 연구" (1996)
  19. "고려의 산신신앙", 2 (1995)
  20. "한국 공동체 신앙의 역사적 연구-동제의 형성 및 전승과 관련하여-" (1997)
  21. "묘제의 변천을 통하여 본 신라사회의 발전과정" (1964)
  22. "한국고대 신관념의 사회적 의미" (1991)
  23. "신라 오통고", 52 (1999)
  24. "조선 고대 산신의 性에 就하여 한국민족문화의 연구" (1948), 을유문화사
  25. "삼국사기 제사지 연구 사학연구 38" (1984)
  26. "신라 오대산사적과 성덕왕의 즉위배경" (1987)
  27. "신라초기불교사연구" (1992)
  28. "신라 도성의 공간구성과 왕경제의 성립과정", 18 (2002)
  29. "사비시대의 삼산숭배 백제의 종교와 사상" (1994)
  30. "삼국사기 分註의 성격-신라본기를 중심으로-" (1989)
  31. "삼국사기 분주의 유형적 검토-신라본기를 중심으로-" (1996), 민족사
  32. "신라의 풍토와 그 역사적 특성" (1985)
  33. "신라 중고기 청도 산서지방의 전략적 중요성" (1996), 윤용진교수정년퇴임기념논총
  34. "신라인의 신앙과 종교", 16 (1997)
  35. "신라사회사연구" (1997), 일조각
  36. "신라오악의 성립과 그 의의" (1972)
  37. "신라정치사회사연구" (1974)
  38. "통일신라와 발해의 사회" (1982)
  39. "신라 삼산의 의의, 한국고대사론" (1995), 일조각
  40. "사비시대 백제의 4方界山과 호국사찰의 성립-法王의 불교이념 확대시책과 관련하여- 백제연구 20" (1989)
  41. "신라 오묘제의 성립과 그 배경, 한국고대사와 고고학" (2000)
  42. "신라정치제도사연구" (1993)
  43. "삼국시대의 시조인식과 그 변천" (1996)
  44. "역주 삼국사기 3-주석편(상)-" (1997), 한국정신문화연구원
  45. "역주 삼국사기 4-주석편(하)-" (1997), 한국정신문화연구원
  46. "한민족의 기원과 샤머니즘(巫) 한국 민족의 기원과 형성(하) 소화" (1996)
  47. 주보돈, "신라의 달구벌천도 기도와 김씨집단의 유래", 52 (1999)
  48. 채미하, "삼국사기 제사지 신라조의 분석-신라 국가제사체계의 재검토와 관련하여-", 13 (1998)
  49. 채미하, "신라 종묘제의 수용과 그 의미", 176 (2002)
  50. 채미하, "신라 선덕왕대 사직단 설치와 祀典의 정비", 한국고대사연구, 30, pp.113~142 (2003), 한국고대사학회
  51. 채미하, "신라의 오묘제 ‘시정’과 신문왕권", 70 (2004)
  52. 채미하, "청해진의 祀典편제와 해양신앙", 진단학보, (99), pp.43~72 (2005), 진단학회
  53. 채미하, "신라 중대 오례와 왕권-오례 수용을 중심으로-", 한국사상사학, 27, pp.127~165 (2006), 한국사상사학회
  54. 최광식, "국가제사의 제장 고대 한국의 국가와 제사" (1994)
  55. 최광식, "신라와 당의 대사중사소사 비교연구", 95 (1996)
  56. 홍순창, "신라 삼산오악에 대하여 신라민속의 신연구-신라문화제학술발표회논문집- 제4집" (1983)
  57. "신라의 묘제와 묘호" (1989)
  58. "신라 태종 묘호의 분규시말" (1982)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)