본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1960년대 전국외국기관노조와 한미행정협정 체결 촉구 운동

The Foreign Organization Korean Employees Union and Its Campaign to Establish SOFA in the 1960's

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This study examines the formation of The United States Army Korean Employee Labor Union(USAKELU) and Foreign Organization Korean Employees Union(FOKEU) which were organized in the late 1950's. It also discusses both union's activities. The USAKELU organized in November, 1959 to demand higher pay. It demanded the ROK-U.S. Industrial Relation Agreement as a part of the ROK-U.S. Status-of-Forces Agreement(SOFA). The ROK-U.S. Industrial Relation Agreement couldn't be made. If it had been made, it could have temporarily settled Korean workers' industrial relations in the U.S. Army agencies until SOFA's establishment. The movement for establishing SOFA was launched seriously around April 1960 revolution. It appealed to all sections of society. Therefore the movement pressed for a plenary session of the House of Representatives to resolve the ROK-U.S. governments to conclude SOFA. A power group from the National Council of Trade Unions(Jeonkook nohyeop) took the initiative in the USAKELU during the period of the April revolution. Kim Dae-yeon, a central figure in Jeonkook nohyeop was elected as a president of the USAKELU on December 20, 1960. The movement that demanded SOFA, including demands for higher pay and the improvement of the working conditions were advanced with the election of president Kim Dae-yeon. However these movements stagnated because of the 5.16 military coup. The USAKELU was reorganized into the FOKEU after the 5.16 military coup broke out. Conflict ensued between one group from the old Korea Labor Union(Hankook noryoen) and another group supported by the military authorities. The latter group seized the control of the organization and led it through the 1960's. The reorganized FOKEU focused on rebuilding and establishing new local branches, but it wasn't successful. Not until the beginning of 1963 did the FOKEU begin to bear some fruit in increasing its membership. The number of members of the FOKEU steadily increased to rank the third largest behind No.1 textile industry union and No.2 auto workers' union among industrial unions in 1964. The workers who had been employed in the foreign agencies had many problems resulted from various kinds of bad conditions unlike normal Korean workers. Because they have been in a legal dead zone without legal protection as SOFA was not concluded. In addition to that, they faced national discrimination and racial prejudice from the U.S. Armed forces. To improve these poor conditions, FOKEU developed the campaign for SOFA, with the struggle to ask for higher wage and better labor condition. These movements protesting against national discrimination and to change poor labor condition were carried out in the middle of 1960's. Because of these kinds of efforts, SOFA was concluded in July 9, 1966. However, a provision in SOFA left room to fire workers as much as the authorities wanted in the name of ‘military needs’. Furthermore, the right to collective action which was considered the last and the most important right was only nominally granted. Finally, movements for removal of poisonous articles in SOFA came to be left much to be done in the future.

Abstract

This study examines the formation of The United States Army Korean Employee Labor Union(USAKELU) and Foreign Organization Korean Employees Union(FOKEU) which were organized in the late 1950's. It also discusses both union's activities. The USAKELU organized in November, 1959 to demand higher pay. It demanded the ROK-U.S. Industrial Relation Agreement as a part of the ROK-U.S. Status-of-Forces Agreement(SOFA). The ROK-U.S. Industrial Relation Agreement couldn't be made. If it had been made, it could have temporarily settled Korean workers' industrial relations in the U.S. Army agencies until SOFA's establishment. The movement for establishing SOFA was launched seriously around April 1960 revolution. It appealed to all sections of society. Therefore the movement pressed for a plenary session of the House of Representatives to resolve the ROK-U.S. governments to conclude SOFA. A power group from the National Council of Trade Unions(Jeonkook nohyeop) took the initiative in the USAKELU during the period of the April revolution. Kim Dae-yeon, a central figure in Jeonkook nohyeop was elected as a president of the USAKELU on December 20, 1960. The movement that demanded SOFA, including demands for higher pay and the improvement of the working conditions were advanced with the election of president Kim Dae-yeon. However these movements stagnated because of the 5.16 military coup. The USAKELU was reorganized into the FOKEU after the 5.16 military coup broke out. Conflict ensued between one group from the old Korea Labor Union(Hankook noryoen) and another group supported by the military authorities. The latter group seized the control of the organization and led it through the 1960's. The reorganized FOKEU focused on rebuilding and establishing new local branches, but it wasn't successful. Not until the beginning of 1963 did the FOKEU begin to bear some fruit in increasing its membership. The number of members of the FOKEU steadily increased to rank the third largest behind No.1 textile industry union and No.2 auto workers' union among industrial unions in 1964. The workers who had been employed in the foreign agencies had many problems resulted from various kinds of bad conditions unlike normal Korean workers. Because they have been in a legal dead zone without legal protection as SOFA was not concluded. In addition to that, they faced national discrimination and racial prejudice from the U.S. Armed forces. To improve these poor conditions, FOKEU developed the campaign for SOFA, with the struggle to ask for higher wage and better labor condition. These movements protesting against national discrimination and to change poor labor condition were carried out in the middle of 1960's. Because of these kinds of efforts, SOFA was concluded in July 9, 1966. However, a provision in SOFA left room to fire workers as much as the authorities wanted in the name of ‘military needs’. Furthermore, the right to collective action which was considered the last and the most important right was only nominally granted. Finally, movements for removal of poisonous articles in SOFA came to be left much to be done in the future.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. 전국외국기관노동조합, "외기노조 20년사" (1981)
  2. 임송자, "대한민국 노동운동의 보수적 기원", pp.170~ (2007), 선인
  3. "동아일보 1954년 8월 3일자, 노동조건 개선요구 미군종업원노조쟁의서 제출", ~
  4. "조선일보, 1954년 8월 4일자, 「미군종업원 노조쟁의. 최저임금 1시간당 70환을 요구」", ~
  5. "조선일보, 1954년 8월 8일자, 「미군종업원 노임재의. 총파업의 기세」", ~
  6. "조선일보, 1954년 8월 11일자, 「1만여 노무자 24시간 총파업. 미군종업원의 노임쟁의 악화」", ~
  7. "동아일보, 1954년 8월 11일자, 「9일 상오 6시 파업단행 미군종업원노조의 임금인상 등 문제 악화」", ~
  8. "조선일보, 1954년 8월 12일자, 「10일 정상적으로 취업. 미군종업원, 노임쟁의 계속할 기세」.", ~
  9. "조선일보, 1954년 10월 28일자, 「부산 등지 3만 미군종업원에 27일 정오부터 지불. 노임을 5백환 대 1弗로」", ~
  10. "조선일보, 1954년 11월 11일자, 「현물로 지급을 개시. 부산 등지 미군종업원의 노임. 노초측 항의 제출코 파업기세」.", ~
  11. "조선일보, 1954년 12월 12일자, 「미군종업원 노임 7할 5푼 인상」", ~
  12. "조선일보, 1956년 5월 10일자, 「쟁의는 계속. 노조협의체 구성될 때가지」", ~
  13. "조선일보, 1960년 4월 10일자, 「임금인상 늦어 미군노조 데모 기세」", ~
  14. "동아일보, 1960년 1월 23일자, 「對美노무관계협정 촉구. 미군종업원노조서 기본권 유린 지적」", ~
  15. "동아일보, 1961년 2월 23일자, 「韓人은 한국법으로 보사부서 미군종업원요구에 발표. 미측에도 협조 요망」", ~
  16. 전국철도노동조합, "철로30년사", pp.128~129 (1977)
  17. 한국노동조합총연맹, "한국노동조합운동사" (1979)
  18. 한국노동조합총연맹, "한국노총 50년사", pp.314~315 (2002)
  19. 한국군사혁명사편찬위원회, "한국군사혁명사 제1집(상)", pp.329~ (1963)
  20. "동아일보, 1961년 5월 23일자, 「정당․사회단체에 해산령. 학술․종교단체는 제외. 31일까지 재등록 실시」", ~
  21. Records of the U.S. Department of State relating to the internal affairs of Korea, "NARA", ~ (1960)
  22. 사업보고, "한국노동조합총연맹", ~ (1962)
  23. 임송자, "4월혁명 이후 노동조직 변화와 한국노총 결성 과정", 한국독립운동사연구, (26), pp.253~292 (2006), 한국독립운동사연구소
  24. 이원보, "한국노동운동사 5", 지식마당
  25. 사업보고서, "전국외국기관노동조합", ~ (1966)
  26. 사업보고, "한국노동조합총연맹", 34~35 (1967)
  27. 사업보고, "한국노동조합총연맹", 32~33 (1968)
  28. 사업보고, "한국노동조합총연맹", 36~37 (1969)
  29. 오정자, "전국외국기관노동조합 활동에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1971
  30. "막바지에 이른 외기노조의 쟁의, 신동아 66년 3월호", ~
  31. "동아일보, 1962년 4월 17일자, 「미군부대 노무자 임금인상을 요구. 42~30%․유급휴가제도도. 외국기관종업원노조, 당국에 제시」", ~
  32. 사업보고서, "전국외국기관노동조합", ~ (1964)
  33. "조선일보, 1964년 1월 29일자, 「외국기관노조쟁의 임금 23% 인상 합의」", ~
  34. "서울신문, 1948년 8월 26일자, 「한미군사협정 조인」", ~
  35. 성장현, "한․미 주둔군 지위협정(SOFA)의 정책의제 형성에 관한 연구", 박사, 행정학과, pp.2003
  36. 김창수, "한미상호방위조약과 한미행정협정", 역사비평, (봄), pp.420~421 (2001)
  37. "동아일보, 1960년 1월 15일자, 「한미행정협정체결 촉구. 한인종업원 권익보장에 노총 성명」", ~
  38. "조선일보, 1960년 9월 21일자, 「미군종업원노련 5천여 명 서명획득」", ~
  39. "동아일보, 1961년 3월 2일자, 「한미행정협정 民院서 체결촉구를 결의」", ~
  40. "조선일보, 1961년 2월 1일자, 「미군종업원들 시위 임금인상 요구」", ~
  41. "조선일보, 1961년 2월 1일자, 「미군종업원노조 부산서도 데모」", ~
  42. "조선일보, 1961년 2월 14일자, 「미군종업원들 부산 인천 등지 쟁의 돌입」", ~
  43. "동아일보, 1962년 3월 16일자, 「한미행정협정 노조총련서 촉구」", ~
  44. "동아일보, 1962년 9월 21일, 「“노동협정도 규정” 외국기관노조, 행협에 요구」", ~
  45. "동아일보, 1965년 5월 15일자, 「한미행협 대강 타결. 실무교섭 끝맺고 6월초 조인?」", ~
  46. "동아일보, 1965년 5월 3일자, 「쟁의권 없는 행협 체결되면 총파업 단행키로」", ~
  47. "조선일보, 1965년 5월 4일자, 「외기노조서 결의. “총파업 단행” 쟁의권 인정 안되면」", ~
  48. "동아일보, 1965년 5월 10일자, 「쟁의권 박탈말라. 굴욕행협 거부하도록 두 외국기관노조서 기본권수호 궐기대회」", ~
  49. "조선일보, 1965년 5월 11일자, 「전국외국기관노조원 궐기대회, “관철 안되면 총파업” 결의」", ~
  50. "동아일보, 1965년 5월 11일자, 「비민주적 행협 철회하라. 인권옹협서 성명」", ~
  51. "동아일보, 1966년 2월 5일자, 「농성하던 외기노조원 미 무장헌병과 충돌. 총검 휘둘러 8명 중경상」", ~
  52. "동아일보, 1966년 2월 7일자, 「(사설) 미군과 노무자의 충돌사고」", ~
  53. "동아일보, 1965년 12월 22일자, 「한미행정협정 1월 10일께 조인」", ~
  54. "동아일보, 66년 4월 21일자, 「한미행협 보완 교섭 재개. 미측에 재고 촉구. 李 외무, 金 주미대사에 훈령」", ~
  55. "동아일보, 1966년 7월 9일자, 「한미행정협정 조인. 14년 교섭에 종지부. 비준 3개월 후 발효」", ~
  56. 이석우, "한미행정협정과 국제법", pp.29~ (2005), 학영사
  57. 법과사회연구회, "한미행정협정" (1988), 힘
  58. 조국, "유린당한 주권․인권과 한미행정협정의 허구성", 역사비평, (여름), pp.68~ (1992)
  59. 김치선, "한미행협과 노무조항", Fides, 13 (1967)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)