대동아전쟁과 다케우치 요시미(竹内好)의 전쟁책임론
War of Great East Asia and Takeuchi Yoshimi's War Responsibility
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines how Takeuchi changed his attitude towards war responsibility and problems in the Great War after his defeat. Takeuchi thought that he could transform the outside world through self-denial and self-innovation instead of external authority. He concluded that this idea coincided with the Great East Asian War, which criticized the Western modernity on December 8, 1941, declaring propaganda against the United States and called for the establishment of the Greater East Asia Coalition through the transformation of the Japanese nation. And he positively accepted this war. After the defeat, Takeuchi discussed the issue of war responsibility, saying that Japan's war was an invasion war as well as an imperialist war. Takeuchi argued that he could not agree to transfer responsibility for the imperialist war to Japan alone. Therefore, Takeuchi's war responsibilities were not limited to war responsibility for everything, but rather limited to which part of war and which side to take responsibility for. It seems that Takeuchi does not deny the meaning of the War of Great East Asia in the same way as before. Based on this perception, he traced the problems of Japanese modernization. In order to achieve this purpose, he changed the method of studying only China and included the problem of Japanese modernization in the postwar period.
Abstract
This paper examines how Takeuchi changed his attitude towards war responsibility and problems in the Great War after his defeat. Takeuchi thought that he could transform the outside world through self-denial and self-innovation instead of external authority. He concluded that this idea coincided with the Great East Asian War, which criticized the Western modernity on December 8, 1941, declaring propaganda against the United States and called for the establishment of the Greater East Asia Coalition through the transformation of the Japanese nation. And he positively accepted this war. After the defeat, Takeuchi discussed the issue of war responsibility, saying that Japan's war was an invasion war as well as an imperialist war. Takeuchi argued that he could not agree to transfer responsibility for the imperialist war to Japan alone. Therefore, Takeuchi's war responsibilities were not limited to war responsibility for everything, but rather limited to which part of war and which side to take responsibility for. It seems that Takeuchi does not deny the meaning of the War of Great East Asia in the same way as before. Based on this perception, he traced the problems of Japanese modernization. In order to achieve this purpose, he changed the method of studying only China and included the problem of Japanese modernization in the postwar period.
참고문헌 (14)
- 竹内好, "竹内好全集 5" (1981), 筑摩書房
- 竹内好, "竹内好全集 8" (1980), 筑摩書房
- 竹内好, "竹内好全集 13" (1981), 筑摩書房
- 竹内好, "竹内好全集 14" (1981), 筑摩書房
- 竹内好, "竹内好全集 17" (1982), 筑摩書房
- 쑨거, "다케우치 요시미라는 물음" (2007), 그린비
- 小熊英二, "民主と愛国" (2002), 新曜社
- 김동기, "다케우치 요시미(竹内好)의 아시아 연대 방법론에 대한 비판적 고찰", 오늘의 문예비평, 36 (2000)
- 윤여일, "내재하는 중국 - 다케우치 요시미에게 중국 연구란 무엇이었나", 역사비평, (87), pp.262~300 (2009), 역사문제연구소
- 고성빈, "다케우치 요시미(竹內好)의 동아시아론: 역사의 구조와 현상의 분리기획", 아세아연구, 55(1), pp.193~230 (2012), 아세아문제연구원
- 조경란, "냉전시기(1950-60년대) 일본 지식인의 중국 인식-다케우치 요시미의 중국관 : 사상적 아포리아와 ‘좌파-오리엔탈리즘’", 사회와 철학, (28), pp.377~412 (2014), 한국사회와철학연구회
- 岡山麻子, "竹内好の戦争責任と中国論", 年報日本史叢 (2001), 筑波大学
- 上村希美雄, "戦後史のなかのアジア主義", 歴史学研究, 561 (1986)
- 佐藤美奈子, "アジアを語るということ", 社会科学研究, 58(1) (2006), 東京大学
