시뮬레이션의 역사서술 가능성 — Insightmaker의 운용을 중심으로 —
The Possibility of a History Description in Simulation — Focused on Insightmaker Operations —
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Historical issues are set in real politics and social environment. Historical problems arise from differences in historical perceptions between countries, but also within the same group that shares history. Therefore, there is something in common that various historical problems originate from differences in interpretation of historical events. Looking at this more fundamentally, the difference in historical interpretation originates from the subjectivity of the interpretation body. Existing historians positively accept the subjective judgment of historians as a driving force for various historical interpretations, but there is no standard for how far subjective intervention can be allowed, so history associated with real politics serves as a theoretical weapon to attack others and secure their own interests. Historical coding employs an algorithm-based simulation method, thus minimizing subjective interventions in historical interpretation. Of course, in the process of filling in the contents of algorithms, the composition of the agent's properties is bound to depend on subjective judgment. However, the task of constructing properties is relatively dependent on objective data, and above all, it is impossible to subjective interpretation because it is a task before the results are obtained. In historical coding, subjectivity is involved in establishing the relationship between data selection and data. Compared to existing historical interpretation methods, historical coding can exclude realistic problems from historical interpretation.
Abstract
Historical issues are set in real politics and social environment. Historical problems arise from differences in historical perceptions between countries, but also within the same group that shares history. Therefore, there is something in common that various historical problems originate from differences in interpretation of historical events. Looking at this more fundamentally, the difference in historical interpretation originates from the subjectivity of the interpretation body. Existing historians positively accept the subjective judgment of historians as a driving force for various historical interpretations, but there is no standard for how far subjective intervention can be allowed, so history associated with real politics serves as a theoretical weapon to attack others and secure their own interests. Historical coding employs an algorithm-based simulation method, thus minimizing subjective interventions in historical interpretation. Of course, in the process of filling in the contents of algorithms, the composition of the agent's properties is bound to depend on subjective judgment. However, the task of constructing properties is relatively dependent on objective data, and above all, it is impossible to subjective interpretation because it is a task before the results are obtained. In historical coding, subjectivity is involved in establishing the relationship between data selection and data. Compared to existing historical interpretation methods, historical coding can exclude realistic problems from historical interpretation.
참고문헌 (13)
- "공기어분석"[URL]
- "조선왕조실록 빛낸 ‘이웅근 CD롬’", 중앙일보, ~ (2015)
- "Simulation-Wikipedia"[URL]
- "Text_mining-Wikipedia"[URL]
- 서울대학교 역사연구소, "복원과 재현 : 역사와 현재의 만남" (2012), 선인
- Ahlrich Meyer, "Endlösung der Judenfrage in Frankreich 1940–1944" (2005), Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
- Uwe Meixner, "Einführung in die Ontologie" (2004), Wissenschaftl Buchges
- 김기봉, "인공지능 시대 “Historia, Quo Vadis?”", 역사학보, (233), pp.211~234 (2017), 역사학회[DOI]
