고구려 왕명과 왕호의 분석— 고구려 성씨문화 이해의 토대작업으로서 —
An Analysis of the Names of Kings in Koguryeo — For Building a Foundation of the Understanding of Koguryeo Family Name culture —
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The official title of a Koguryeo monarch was systemized into three components - the Ho, the last name, and the Hwi(Myung). The monarch’s Wangho would be decided posthumously. The first three kings of the dynasty had no separate procedure to decide this Wangho after death, and used their Hwi(Myung) as a posthumous Wangho. After this period, they titled the deceased monarchs with the name of the area they were buried in. This was not a formal procedure to decide the posthumous Wangho, but the fact that they were given a new name that didn’t include their title during the time they were living shows a development in the legislation of Wangho. The following accomplishment (or characteristic) Wangho was created through a establishment procedure of examining and discussing the former king’s accomplishments, completing the legislation of Wangho. The accomplishment Wangho not only contained words showing the characteristics or achievements of the king but also included the Hwi and the name of the burial area. The former tradition had lived on in the Wangho. According to this tradition, when they failed to denominate a new Wangho, they would use the name of the burial area or the Hwi. The recording of the royal surname being “Hae” for not only the Koguryeo royal family but also that of Buyeo and Baekje likely comes from “Hae”, an indigenous word of Koguryeo and Buyeo, being the first syllable of the monarchs’ names. Later historians may have inadvertently distorted historical fact while restructuring ancient names according to their contemporary conventions of naming. It is evident that a non-prejudiced and fundamental observation/approach of ancient names is necessary.
Abstract
The official title of a Koguryeo monarch was systemized into three components - the Ho, the last name, and the Hwi(Myung). The monarch’s Wangho would be decided posthumously. The first three kings of the dynasty had no separate procedure to decide this Wangho after death, and used their Hwi(Myung) as a posthumous Wangho. After this period, they titled the deceased monarchs with the name of the area they were buried in. This was not a formal procedure to decide the posthumous Wangho, but the fact that they were given a new name that didn’t include their title during the time they were living shows a development in the legislation of Wangho. The following accomplishment (or characteristic) Wangho was created through a establishment procedure of examining and discussing the former king’s accomplishments, completing the legislation of Wangho. The accomplishment Wangho not only contained words showing the characteristics or achievements of the king but also included the Hwi and the name of the burial area. The former tradition had lived on in the Wangho. According to this tradition, when they failed to denominate a new Wangho, they would use the name of the burial area or the Hwi. The recording of the royal surname being “Hae” for not only the Koguryeo royal family but also that of Buyeo and Baekje likely comes from “Hae”, an indigenous word of Koguryeo and Buyeo, being the first syllable of the monarchs’ names. Later historians may have inadvertently distorted historical fact while restructuring ancient names according to their contemporary conventions of naming. It is evident that a non-prejudiced and fundamental observation/approach of ancient names is necessary.
참고문헌 (58)
- "三國史記", ~
- "三國遺事", ~
- "高麗史", ~
- "擇里志", ~
- "日本書紀", ~
- "漢書", ~
- "後漢書", ~
- "三國志", ~
- "魏書", ~
- "北齊書", ~
- "周書", ~
- "舊唐書", ~
- 김만원, "白虎通義譯註" (2018), 역락
- 高寬敏, "“三国史記”原典的硏究" (1996), 雄山閣
- 김기흥, "고구려건국사" (2002), 창작과 비평사
- 여호규, "고구려 초기 정치사 연구" (2014), 신서원
- 임기환, "고구려 정치사 연구" (2004), 한나래
- 권순홍, "고구려 도성 연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 김기흥, "한국고대국가의 형성" (1990)
- 김용선, "고구려유리왕고", 역사학보, 87 (1980)
- 김종은, "고구려 초기 천도기사로 살펴본 왕실교체", 숙명한국사론, 3 (2003)
- 김철준, "이병도기념논총" (1956)
- 김현숙, "고구려의 해씨왕과 고씨왕", 대구사학, 47 (1994)
- 羅新, "고구려 王號제도에 관한 몇 가지 추론", 한국고대사연구, (67), pp.61~80 (2012), 한국고대사학회
- 노명호, "백제의 동명신화와 동명묘-동명신화의 재생성 현상과 관련하여", 역사학연구, 10 (1981)
- 노태돈, "李基白先生古稀紀念韓國史學論叢 (上)" (1994), 一潮閣
- 노태돈, "고구려의 성립과 변천", 한국고대사론, 2 (1988)
- 武田幸男, "高句麗史と東アジア" (1989), 岩波書店
- 박노석, "고구려 초기 왕들의 계보(系譜) 고찰", 전북사학, (44), pp.5~26 (2014), 전북사학회
- 박윤선, "백제 인명의 이해 시론 - 막고와 해를 중심으로", 백제학보, (21), pp.97~118 (2017), 백제학회
- 박윤선, "백제의 중국식 이름문화 수용 과정의 고찰- 백제왕과 왕족의 이름을 중심으로 -", 백제학보, (25), pp.127~157 (2018), 백제학회
- 박윤선, "백제 성씨문화의 이해", 백제학보, (29), pp.31~59 (2019), 백제학회
- 徐永大, "韓國古代 神觀念의 社會的 意味", 박사, 국사학, pp.1991
- 여호규, "高句麗 國內 遷都의 시기와 배경", 한국고대사연구, (38), pp.37~84 (2005), 한국고대사학회
- 여호규, "高句麗 初期의 王位繼承原理와 古鄒加", 동방학지, (150), pp.139~196 (2010), 국학연구원
- 이도학, "『三國史記』의 高句麗 王城 記事 檢證", 한국고대사연구, (79), pp.135~172 (2015), 한국고대사학회
- 이도학, "고구려 초기 왕계의 복원을 위한 검토", 한국학논총, 20 (1992), 한양대학교
- 李純根, "新羅時代 姓氏取得과 그 意味", 韓國史論, 6 (1980), 서울대 국사학과
- 이정란, "고려 전기 국왕 諡號制의 내용과 그 의미", 韓國史學報, (82), pp.63~95 (2021), 고려사학회[DOI]
- 이정빈, "고구려의 국내성·환도성과 천도", 한국고대사연구, (87), pp.51~85 (2017), 한국고대사학회[DOI]
- 李鍾書, "羅末麗初 姓氏 사용의 擴大와 그 背景", 韓國史論, 37 (1997), 서울대 국사학과
- 이준성, "고구려 초기 정치세력의 분포와 계루부의 등장- 천도·왕실교체에 대한 재검토를 겸하여 -", 한국고대사연구, (99), pp.131~164 (2020), 한국고대사학회[DOI]
- 임기환, "고구려 王號의 변천과 성격", 한국고대사연구, 28, pp.5~42 (2002), 한국고대사학회
- 임기환, "고구려본기 전거 자료의 계통과 성격", 한국고대사연구, (42), pp.21~78 (2006), 한국고대사학회
- 임기환, "고구려 王系의 성립과정과 시기", 한국고대사연구, (83), pp.97~125 (2016), 한국고대사학회
- 임기환, "고구려 國內 遷都 시기 再論", 사학연구, (132), pp.177~230 (2018), 한국사학회[DOI]
- 田中俊明, "“三国史記”撰進と“旧三国史”", 朝鮮学報, 83 (1977)
- 鄭早苗, "旗田巍博士古稀朝鮮歷史論集(上)" (1979), 龍溪書舍
- 조인성, "4･5세기 高句麗 王室의 世系認識 변화", 한국고대사연구, 4 (1991)
- 池內宏, "高句麗の五族及び五部", 東洋學報, 16(1) (1926)
- 최진열, "中國 周邊國이 수용한 ‘王’의 이미지 ― 北朝의 異姓王 濫封과 百濟新羅의 複數王출현현상의 비교사적 이해 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (17), pp.173~225 (2007), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
- 최진열, "高句麗 廣開土大王 전후 王號의 性格 -五胡諸國･北魏의 諡號･廟號 및 遊牧國家의 可汗號와의 비교-", 한국고대사연구, (67), pp.27~60 (2012), 한국고대사학회
- 김상윤, "高句麗 王稱語 小考", 어문연구, 59, pp.5~28 (2009), 어문연구학회[DOI]
- 백두현, "당대 자료로 본 훈독법의 생성 시기 고찰", 구결연구, (45), pp.17~62 (2020), 구결학회[DOI]
- 심경호, "이름과 호의 한자문화", 어문연구(語文硏究), 46(3), pp.343~367 (2018), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 유창균, "고구려 인명 표기에 나타난 용자법의 검토", 동양학, 5 (1975), 동양학연구소
- 이장희, "고구려어의 어말모음 교체에 대하여", 언어과학연구, (39), pp.1~26 (2006), 언어과학회
- 장재웅, "중국어 역사음운론을 통한 고구려신화에 반영된 언어자료 분석-東明朱蒙 동음설 및 東盟東明 동음설을 중심으로", 중국언어연구, (23), pp.489~511 (2006), 한국중국언어학회