본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

15세기 중국에서 유행한 조선의 마미군 패션, 그 문화적 변용에 대하여

Chosŏn’s the Mamigun(馬尾裙) fashion popular in China in the 15th century — A Study on its Cultural Transformation —

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The shape of the skirts of Chosŏn women was a dressy and wide throughout the Chosŏn Dynasty. So, there was a device to maintain the volume of the skirt. Usually several layers of undergarments were worn, which served as support for the skirt to look fuller. In the Chosŏn Dynasty, women's underwear not only played a sanitary role, but was also a part of fashion. At that time, women had to wear several layers of underwear under their skirts to follow the fashion of Chosŏn. A lot of fabric is needed, and these fabrics aren't cheap either. In Cheju Island(濟州島), agriculture was not developed, making it difficult to produce textiles, so they had to go to land cities by boat to purchase them. Cheju people wanted to find a more economical way, and that was mamigun(馬尾裙). In Cheju Island, it was more economical to wear a petticoat made of horsehair than to wear multiple layers of underwear when trying to create the effect of making a skirt look dressy. On land in Chosŏn, cotton fabrics are cheaper, but in Cheju Island, it is difficult to find fabrics, but horsehair was easy to find. In the end, Cheju's economic environment changed the materials of clothing. Mamigun was ‘the product of cultural transformation’ that followed the fashion of Chosŏn and replaced the material with horsehair, common in Cheju, instead of textiles. Mamigun, born in Cheju in the 15th century, was a unique 'petticoat' in that an underskirt was made of horsehair. In the West(西歐), the petticoat made from horsehair, crinoline, was also popular in the 19th century. Horsehair was used as a material for petticoats for women's dresses in both East and West. The mamigun, born in Cheju, was transmitted to the 'Jiangnan(江南)' region of Ming through maritime trade in the 15th century, and became very popular in the the Jiangnan area of Ming dynasty. Through mamigun, it is possible to confirm the existence of 'horsehair', which was used as a petticoat material in both East and West, as well as the new material and shape of clothes on Cheju Island, the change of culture within Chosŏn, the history of wide cultural exchange between Chosŏn and the Ming dynasty.

Abstract

The shape of the skirts of Chosŏn women was a dressy and wide throughout the Chosŏn Dynasty. So, there was a device to maintain the volume of the skirt. Usually several layers of undergarments were worn, which served as support for the skirt to look fuller. In the Chosŏn Dynasty, women's underwear not only played a sanitary role, but was also a part of fashion. At that time, women had to wear several layers of underwear under their skirts to follow the fashion of Chosŏn. A lot of fabric is needed, and these fabrics aren't cheap either. In Cheju Island(濟州島), agriculture was not developed, making it difficult to produce textiles, so they had to go to land cities by boat to purchase them. Cheju people wanted to find a more economical way, and that was mamigun(馬尾裙). In Cheju Island, it was more economical to wear a petticoat made of horsehair than to wear multiple layers of underwear when trying to create the effect of making a skirt look dressy. On land in Chosŏn, cotton fabrics are cheaper, but in Cheju Island, it is difficult to find fabrics, but horsehair was easy to find. In the end, Cheju's economic environment changed the materials of clothing. Mamigun was ‘the product of cultural transformation’ that followed the fashion of Chosŏn and replaced the material with horsehair, common in Cheju, instead of textiles. Mamigun, born in Cheju in the 15th century, was a unique 'petticoat' in that an underskirt was made of horsehair. In the West(西歐), the petticoat made from horsehair, crinoline, was also popular in the 19th century. Horsehair was used as a material for petticoats for women's dresses in both East and West. The mamigun, born in Cheju, was transmitted to the 'Jiangnan(江南)' region of Ming through maritime trade in the 15th century, and became very popular in the the Jiangnan area of Ming dynasty. Through mamigun, it is possible to confirm the existence of 'horsehair', which was used as a petticoat material in both East and West, as well as the new material and shape of clothes on Cheju Island, the change of culture within Chosŏn, the history of wide cultural exchange between Chosŏn and the Ming dynasty.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
  2. "明實錄", ~
  3. "明史", ~
  4. "御定佩文韻府", ~
  5. 陸容, "菽園雜記", ~
  6. 王錡, "寓圃雜記", ~
  7. 沈德符, "萬曆野獲編", ~
  8. 韓昻, "圖繪寶鑒續編", ~
  9. 馮夢龍, "憑夢龍全集", ~
  10. 魚叔權, "稗官雜記", ~
  11. 崔溥, "漂海錄", ~
  12. 韓致奫, "海東繹史", ~
  13. "瑞犬納福-戊戌新年館藏文物展", 中國國家博物館 展示, ~ (2018)
  14. 김재근, "한국선박사연구" (1984), 서울대학교출판부
  15. 박성실, "조선시대 여인의 멋과 차림새" (2005), 단국대학교 출판부
  16. 이민정, "코르셋과 고래뼈" (2018), 푸른들녘
  17. 이민주, "치마저고리의 욕망" (2013), 문학동네
  18. 이원식, "한국의 배" (1991), 대원사
  19. 조효순, "한국복식풍속사연구" (1998), 일지사
  20. "한국의식주생활사전 의생활편" (2017), 국립민속박물관
  21. 大木康, "明末のはぐれ知識人―憑夢龍と蘇州文化(講談社選書メチエ〈45〉) の商品スペック" (1995), 講談社
  22. 巫仁恕, "品味奢華-晚明的消費社會與士大夫" (2007), 中華書局
  23. 巫仁恕, "사치의 제국 - 명말 사대부의 사치와 유행의 문화사" (2019), 글항아리
  24. 阮景東, "帝國的啓蒙-明朝的歷史熱變" (2014), 線裝書局
  25. 張嶔, "圈子・段子之大明帝國日常生活直播" (2019), 崧燁文化事業有限公司
  26. 村井章介, "アジアのなかの中世日本" (1988), 校倉書房
  27. 村井章介, "中世倭人傳" (1993), 岩波新書
  28. Coatesworth, Jane, "Understanding the Horse's Skin and Coat" (2016), Crowood Press
  29. 크리스토퍼 브루어드, "모던 슈트 스토리" (2018), 시대의창
  30. 구도영, "16세기 조선 對明 불법무역의 확대와 그 의의", 한국사연구, (170), pp.177~223 (2015), 한국사연구회
  31. 구도영, "16세기 조선 對明 사행단의 정보수집과 정보력", 대동문화연구, (95), pp.85~120 (2016), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  32. 구도영, "“Petticoat Fever” Driven by Chosŏn Korea Garments: Exploring a “fad” in Early Ming China and Its Implications for Regional Interactions between the Chosŏn and Ming Dynasties", International Journal of Korean History, 27(1), pp.177~212 (2022), 한국사연구소[DOI]
  33. 김나영, "조선후기 濟州人의 故漂 양상에 대한 고찰", 한국사연구, (177), pp.191~229 (2017), 한국사연구회
  34. 김보한, "일본 중세사의 ‘해양인식’, 어떻게 볼 것인가", 일본역사연구, (40), pp.101~118 (2014), 일본사학회
  35. 박원길, "조선시대 유학자들이 본 제주의 유목문화", 제주도연구, 48 (2017)
  36. 박성실, "조선조 치마 재고–16세기 출토복식을 중심으로", 복식, 30 (1996)
  37. 송미경, "16세기 여성 복식에 관한 연구", 복식, 57(8), pp.125~136 (2007), 한국복식학회
  38. 송종호, "무라이 쇼스케(村井章介)의 ‘境界人論’ 및 그 倭寇 연구 체계에 대한 비판적 검토", 한국중세사연구, (46), pp.345~373 (2016), 한국중세사학회
  39. 溫少華, "명대(明代) 황실 구성원의 조회의례(朝會儀禮) 복식(服飾) 연구", 복식문화연구, 29(2), pp.204~221 (2021), 복식문화학회[DOI]
  40. 윤성익, "元代 倭寇에 대한 考察", 동양학연구, 5 (1999)
  41. 윤성익, "제주 『地誌』의 왜구 관련 기사-그 사료적 가치와 활용에 대하여-", 한일관계사연구, (71), pp.125~180 (2021), 한일관계사학회[DOI]
  42. 윤현진, "조선후기 여자속옷에 관한 연구", 한국의상디자인학회지, 6(3), pp.416~430 (2004), 한국의상디자인학회
  43. 이민주, "제주 복식의 다름이 조선의 ‘갓’문화에 끼친 영향", 한국학, 43(3), pp.117~147 (2020), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
  44. 이영, "고려 말기 왜구 구성원에 관한 고찰-‘고려, 일본인 연합’론 또는 ‘고려,조선인 주체’론의 비판적 검토", 한일관계사연구, 5 (1996)
  45. 이영, "朝鮮史編修官 나카무라 히데다카(中村栄孝)의 왜구 패러다임과 14~ 15세기 동아시아 국제관계 인식", 동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집 (2014)
  46. 이수진, "조선후기 제주 표류민의 중국 표착과 송환 과정 — <제주계록(濟州啓錄)>을 중심으로 —", 온지논총, (53), pp.107~133 (2017), 온지학회[DOI]
  47. 이순자, "宋代 女子服飾에 대한 考察", 복식문화연구, 3(2) (1995)
  48. 이영권, "15∼17세기 제주유민의 사회사적 연구", 박사, 사회학과, pp.2013
  49. 이준갑, "巫仁恕 著 『品味 奢華-晩明的消費社會與士大夫』 (中央硏究院·聯經出版公司, 2007.)", 명청사연구, (30), pp.467~475 (2008), 명청사학회[DOI]
  50. 이진숙, "크리놀린 스타일 및 버슬 스타일 재킷의 패턴분석과 재현에 관한 연구", 한국의류산업학회지, 8(1), pp.80~88 (2006), 한국의류산업학회
  51. 정영현, "여말선초의 濟州와 倭寇", 한국민족문화, (75), pp.225~260 (2020), 한국민족문화연구소[DOI]
  52. 정주란, "조선전기 출토 여성복식의 유형과 특징에 관한 연구", 복식, 67(1), pp.147~168 (2017), 한국복식학회[DOI]
  53. 최정, "공신부인(恭慎夫人) 한씨(韓氏)에게 전달된 물품 및 출토복식 분석을 통한 15세기 조선 사대부 가 여성복식 고찰과 착장고증", 복식, 66(7), pp.171~191 (2016), 한국복식학회
  54. 황경순, "무형문화유산으로서 말총공예 전통의 지속과 변화", 문화재, 47(3), pp.160~171 (2014), 국립문화재연구원
  55. 高橋公明, "海と列島文化4 東シナ海と西海文化" (1992), 小学館
  56. 高橋公明, "中世東亞細亞海域에서의 海民과 交流 -濟州島를 중심으로-", 탐라문화, 8 (1989)
  57. 林碩, "《明憲宗元宵行樂圖》中的成化朝政", 文物天地, (3) (2019)
  58. 李洁非, "王錡及其《寓圃雜記》", 蘇州雜志 (2002)
  59. 曾誠, "从 《明憲宗元宵行樂圖》看成化皇帝的新正吉服", 紫禁城, (1) (2018)
  60. 畢乙鑫, "听元宵, 往歲喧嘩-圖像中的明朝元宵節聲音景觀", 音樂探索, (1) (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)