본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

On the Causes of Passives in English, Korean and Chinese from a Corpus-Based Approach

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study examines the factors of passive voice in Korean, English, and Chinese from authentic data through the use of a corpus. The corpora used in this study are NIKLC for Korean, BNC for English, and ECPC for Chinese. The result shows that in English, topicality is the highest factor, connectedness is the second factor, and circumstances dependency is the third factor. In Korean, topicality is the highest factor, circumstances dependency is the second factor and connectedness is the third factor. In Chinese, affectedness is the highest factor, connectedness is the second factor, and topicality is the third factor. Agent omission phenomenon is a common characteristic in the three languages. Circumstances dependency, which is characteristic of Korean passive, is the lowest in English. Though the corpora used in this study may not be completely perfect in their content, this research has its value in the fact that it tries to compare the three languages through the use of a corpus.

Abstract

This study examines the factors of passive voice in Korean, English, and Chinese from authentic data through the use of a corpus. The corpora used in this study are NIKLC for Korean, BNC for English, and ECPC for Chinese. The result shows that in English, topicality is the highest factor, connectedness is the second factor, and circumstances dependency is the third factor. In Korean, topicality is the highest factor, circumstances dependency is the second factor and connectedness is the third factor. In Chinese, affectedness is the highest factor, connectedness is the second factor, and topicality is the third factor. Agent omission phenomenon is a common characteristic in the three languages. Circumstances dependency, which is characteristic of Korean passive, is the lowest in English. Though the corpora used in this study may not be completely perfect in their content, this research has its value in the fact that it tries to compare the three languages through the use of a corpus.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Adger, David, "Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
  2. Bolinger, Dwight L., "Meaning and Form" (1977), Longman
  3. Bolinger, Dwight L., "Linguistics at the Crossroads", pp.57~78 (1977), Jupiter Press
  4. Chafe, Wallace L., "Subjects and Topic", pp.25~56 (1976), Academic Press
  5. Chafe, Wallace L., "Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: the Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing" (1994), University of Chicago Press
  6. Chao, Yuen Ren, "A Grammar of Spoken Chinese" (1968), University of California Press
  7. Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  8. Dik, Simon C., "Functional Grammar" (1978), North-Holland
  9. Givon, Talmy, "On Understanding Grammar" (1979), The University of California Academic Press
  10. Givon, Talmy, "Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study", pp.1~42 (1983), John Benjamins
  11. "Mandarin Passive Voice: Grammar and Usage" (2011)[URL]
  12. Im, Sungchool, "A Linguistic Construal Based on Figure and Ground Organization", A Study on British-American Literature Collection, 21(1), pp.127~145 (2005)
  13. Im, Hongbin, "On Stem-Detachment Phenomenon of Declinable Words", Eoneo, 4(2), pp.55~66 (1979)
  14. Jespersen, Otto, "Essentials of English Grammar" (2013), George Allen and Unwin
  15. Kuno, Susumu, "Comparison of Constraints Functional Constraints in Grammar: On the Unergative Unaccusative Distinction" (2004), John Benjamins
  16. Langacker, Ronald W., "Space Grammar, Analysability, and the English Passive", Language, 58, pp.22~80 (1982)
  17. Langacker, Ronald W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1 (Theoretical Prerequisites)" (1987), Stanford University Press
  18. Langacker, Ronald W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2 (Descriptive Application)" (1991), Stanford University Press
  19. Langacker, Ronald W., "Essential of Cognitive Grammar" (2013), Oxford University Press
  20. Lambrecht, Knud, "Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  21. Li, Charles N., "Subject and Topic", pp.457~490 (1976), Academic Press
  22. Li, Charles N., "Mandarin Chinese: a Functional Reference Grammar" (1989), University of California Press
  23. Li, Eden Sum-hung, "Voice in Chinese: A Systematic Functional Perspective", Functions of Language, 12(2), pp.181~203 (2005)
  24. Sweet, Henry, "A New English Grammar" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  25. Park, Taesun, "A Corpus-Based Study on the Causes of Passives in English, Korean and Chinese", Ph.D., pp.2015
  26. Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 1 (Concept Structuring Systems)" (2000), MIT Press
  27. Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 2 (Typology and Process in Concept Structuring)" (2000), MIT Press
  28. Taylor, John R., "Cognitive Grammar" (2002), Oxford University Press
  29. Tsai, S. G., "A Study of Translation" (1972), You Lian Publishing Company
  30. Tsao, Feng-fu, "Topic Chain in Chinese: A Functional Basic Discourse Unit" (1982), University of Hong Kong
  31. "Hangul to Yale Romanization Converter"[URL]
  32. "British National Corpus"[URL]
  33. "English-Chinese Parallel Corpus"[URL]
  34. "National Institute of Korean Language Corpus"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)