본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상호텍스트성과 전문텍스트 연구

Intertextuality and Professional Text Research.

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This article is concerned with the description of professional texts in networking. It has been recognized that professional textlinguistics is a branch of linguistics and applied linguistics in a narrow conceptual context. In this article, I will try to analyze the structural and functional interaction of professional text on the basis of the investigations of inductive- empirical professional text corpora of various individual languages and communication sectors. In that case, it is possible to characterize the multidisciplinary professional text types. The necessity of establishing the independent direction of integration has been frequently emphasized from a methodological point of view. There have not been general textlinguistics models to represent the specific features of professional texts clearly. I would like to emphasize, therefore, that only a multidisciplinary approach can explain the complex relationship between mechanisms, ‘professional texts/text types.’ From this perspective, intertextuality can be understood as a reference and cognitive processing of specialized information structures or knowledge structures which constitute different levels of professional texts/text types. This kind of networking professional texts of various individual languages has been, as Wilske & Krause (1987) suggested, referred to as traditional intertextuality. The intertextual relationship between professional texts/text types causes a very complex phenomenon. As a result, it is clear that the explanation of the complex determination mechanisms of intertextuality is only possible when the interdisciplinary research approach is well developed. And it is presumed that Moe’s advanced studies would be extended to inductive-empirical basis of this multi-level approach.

Abstract

This article is concerned with the description of professional texts in networking. It has been recognized that professional textlinguistics is a branch of linguistics and applied linguistics in a narrow conceptual context. In this article, I will try to analyze the structural and functional interaction of professional text on the basis of the investigations of inductive- empirical professional text corpora of various individual languages and communication sectors. In that case, it is possible to characterize the multidisciplinary professional text types. The necessity of establishing the independent direction of integration has been frequently emphasized from a methodological point of view. There have not been general textlinguistics models to represent the specific features of professional texts clearly. I would like to emphasize, therefore, that only a multidisciplinary approach can explain the complex relationship between mechanisms, ‘professional texts/text types.’ From this perspective, intertextuality can be understood as a reference and cognitive processing of specialized information structures or knowledge structures which constitute different levels of professional texts/text types. This kind of networking professional texts of various individual languages has been, as Wilske & Krause (1987) suggested, referred to as traditional intertextuality. The intertextual relationship between professional texts/text types causes a very complex phenomenon. As a result, it is clear that the explanation of the complex determination mechanisms of intertextuality is only possible when the interdisciplinary research approach is well developed. And it is presumed that Moe’s advanced studies would be extended to inductive-empirical basis of this multi-level approach.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 고영근, "텍스트이론" (1999), 아르케
  2. 박여성, "간텍스트성의 문제: 현대 독일어 실용 텍스트를 중심으로", 텍스트언어학, 3, pp.83~122 (1996), 한국텍스트언어학회
  3. 오장근, "광고 텍스트의 전략적 이해", 독어학, 1, pp.287~314 (1999), 한국독어학회
  4. 이성만, "독자편지의 텍스트 유형론적 연구 - 대화적 상호 소통구조를 중심으로", 독어교육, 16, pp.149~182 (1998), 한국독어독문학교육학회
  5. 이성만, "상호문화 텍스트언어학의 과제와 전망 - 독일어권 텍스트종류 연구의 동향을 중심으로", 독어학, (17), pp.167~195 (2008), 한국독어학회
  6. 이성만, "텍스트유형학의 현황과 과제", 텍스트언어학, 26, pp.1~53 (2009), 한국텍스트언어학회
  7. 이성만, "텍스트언어학의 계보, 대상 그리고 경향", 언어과학연구, (52), pp.119~148 (2010), 언어과학회
  8. 조국현, "온라인 신문의 하이퍼텍스트종류", 텍스트언어학, 27, pp.111~136 (2009), 한국텍스트언어학회
  9. Adamzik, K, "Textlinguistik. Eine Einführende Darstellung" (2004), Niemeyer
  10. Adamzik, K, "Textsorten in der Akademischen Welt, In Fachtextsorten-in-Vernetzung" (2008), Narr
  11. Baumann, K.-D, "Integratvie Fachtextlinguistik" (1992), Narr
  12. Baumann, K.-D, "Fachtextsorten und Kognition - Erweiterungsangebote an die Fachsprachenforschung, In Fachliche Textsorten: Komponenten - Relationen – Strategien", pp.355~388 (1996), Narr
  13. Baumann, K. D, "Kenntnissysteme im Fachtext" (2001), Hänsel-Hohenhausen
  14. Baumann, K. D, "Fachtexte-in-Vernetzung aus interdisziplinärer Sicht, In Fchtextsorten – gestern und heute", pp.109~217 (2008), Lang
  15. Baumann, K.-D, "Contrastive Fachsprachenforschung" (1992), Narr
  16. de Beaugrande, R.-A, "Einführung in die Textlinguistik" (1981), Niemeyer
  17. Beier, R, "Zur Untersuchung der Fachsprache aus text- und pragmalinguistischer Sicht, In Fachsprachenforschung und –lehre", pp.15~27 (1982), Narr
  18. Clyne, M, "Culture and Discourse Structure", Journal of Pragmatics, 5, pp.61~66 (1981)
  19. Gläser, R, "Standortbestimmung einer Fachtextlinguistik, In Fachsprachliche Textlinguistik", pp.2~19 (1985), Peipzig
  20. Göpferich, S, "Textsorten in Naturwissenschaften und Technik: Pragmatische Typologie - Kontrastierung - Translation" (1995), Narr
  21. Griffig, Th, "Intertextualität in linguistischen Fachaufsätzen des Englischen und Deutschen" (2005)
  22. Heinemann, W, "Grundlagen der Textlinguistik" (2002), Niemeyer
  23. Hoffmann, L, "Fachtextlinguistik, In Fachsprache 5", pp.57~68 (1983)
  24. Hoffmann, L, "Vom Fachtext zur Fachtextsorte, In Vom Fachwort zum Fachtext. Beiträge zur Angewandten Linguistik", pp.131~144 (1988), Narr
  25. Holthuis, S, "Intertextualität" (1993), Stauffenburg
  26. Jakobs, E. M, "Vernetzte Fachkommunikation. Ein Interdisziplinärer Ansatz, In Darstellungsformen der Wissenschaften im Kontrast", pp.189~211 (1998), Narr
  27. Jakobs, E. M, "Textvernetzung in den Wissenschaften. Zitat und Verweis als Ergebnis Rezeptiven, Reproduktiven und Produktiven Handelns" (1999), Niemeyer
  28. Kalverkämper, H, "Interkulturalität, In LSP", pp.69~99 (1998), Narayana Press
  29. Köhnlein, W, "Exemplarischer Physikunterricht. Beispiele und Anmerkungen zu einer Pädagogik der Physik" (1982), Franzbecker
  30. Kurz, Ch, "Filmsynchronisation aus Űbersetzungswissenschaftlicher Sicht" (2006), Verlag Dr. Kovać
  31. Munsberg, K, "Mündlicher Fachkommunikation" (1994), Narr
  32. Oldenburg, H, "Angewandte Fachtextlinguistik. ‘Conclusions’ und ‘Zusammenfassungen’" (1992), Narr
  33. Opilowski, H, "Intertextualität in der Werbung der Printmedien" (2005), Lang
  34. Raasch, A, "Btx. Bildschirmtext. Perspektiven eines Neuen Mediums" (1984), Narr
  35. Schmidt, W, "Funktional-Kommunikative Sprachbeschreibung" (1981), Bibliographisches Institut
  36. Skudlik, S, "Sprachen in den Wissenschaften. Deutsch und Englisch in der internationalen Kommunikation" (1990), Narr
  37. Störel, Th, "Metaphorik im Fach. Bildfelder in der Musikwissenschaftlichen Kommunikation" (1997), Narr
  38. Swales, J. M, "Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings" (1990), CUP
  39. van Dijk, T. A, "Strategies of Discourse Comprehension" (1983), Academic Press
  40. Wilske, L, "Intertextualität als Allgemeine und Spezielle Texteigenschaft", WZ PH Potsdam, 5, pp.890~895 (1987)
  41. Zimmermann, K, "Erkundungen zur Texttypologie" (1978), Narr

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)