본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

텍스트언어학의 계보, 대상 그리고 경향

Traditions, items and trends in Text Linguistics

이성만
언어과학회 (The Linguistic Science Society)|2010.03|언어과학연구 (The Journal of Linguistics Science)|제52호|pp. 119-148

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

하이퍼텍스트(hypertext)텍스트성(textuality)텍스트언어학(text linguistics)텍스트종류(text type)텍스트생산(text poduction)텍스트생산(text understanding)
주제분류언어학

초록

The Text Linguistics presents itself in the theory and in applications as a powerful and evolving discipline. In this work, some content areas will be chosen and discussed. 5 Waves of Research in the framework of the German Text Linguistics. In the 1960s, Text Linguistics was formed in the context of the ‘pragmatic turn'. Questions of the use of language in texts became the subject of research. The second wave is concerned with the question of the characteristics of textuality. The third wave will focus on the operations of the Text Production, the Text Reception and specialized Text Linguistics. In the last three decades, considerable research has been developed for text production. Such studies make the process of problem solving at the center. The foci of the research are differentiated Text Production work on writing in the field of economics, at work, in the mass media and in the sciences. Text comprehension is understood now as an active, cognitive process that takes place in the interaction between the text and its recipient object to the text. Recently, text-linguistic considerations have been from the perspective of understanding of texts as cultural entities. Intertextuality refers to the 1990s when texts are available in other texts in conjunction. The category of Intertextuality proposes to look at texts not as isolated units, which are available in other texts in conjunction. The focus of the latest wave of research is to clarify similarities and differences between digital hypertext and 'traditional' texts.

Abstract

The Text Linguistics presents itself in the theory and in applications as a powerful and evolving discipline. In this work, some content areas will be chosen and discussed. 5 Waves of Research in the framework of the German Text Linguistics. In the 1960s, Text Linguistics was formed in the context of the ‘pragmatic turn'. Questions of the use of language in texts became the subject of research. The second wave is concerned with the question of the characteristics of textuality. The third wave will focus on the operations of the Text Production, the Text Reception and specialized Text Linguistics. In the last three decades, considerable research has been developed for text production. Such studies make the process of problem solving at the center. The foci of the research are differentiated Text Production work on writing in the field of economics, at work, in the mass media and in the sciences. Text comprehension is understood now as an active, cognitive process that takes place in the interaction between the text and its recipient object to the text. Recently, text-linguistic considerations have been from the perspective of understanding of texts as cultural entities. Intertextuality refers to the 1990s when texts are available in other texts in conjunction. The category of Intertextuality proposes to look at texts not as isolated units, which are available in other texts in conjunction. The focus of the latest wave of research is to clarify similarities and differences between digital hypertext and 'traditional' texts.

참고문헌 (113)

  1. van Dijk, T, "텍스트학" (1980), 아르케
  2. Beaugrande, R.A. de, "텍스트언어학입문" (1981), 한신문화사
  3. Brinker, K, "텍스트언어학의 이해" (1985), 역락
  4. 이성만, "텍스트는 체계인가?", 독일문학, 50, pp.303~327 (1993), 한국독어독문학회
  5. 이성만, "텍스트는 원형인가?- 개념 정립을 위한 원형 이론적 토대를 찾아서 -", 독어학, 5, pp.289~312 (2002), 한국독어학회
  6. 이성만, "텍스트문화와 텍스트모형 - 텍스트종류 「부음」의 문화적 차이와 변화를 중심으로 -", 텍스트언어학, 12, pp.213~236 (2002), 한국텍스트언어학회
  7. 이성만, "텍스트언어학의 개념과 대상", 언어과학연구, 1(29), pp.209~230 (2004), 언어과학회
  8. 이성만, "페어클러프(N. Fairclough)의 비판적 담화분석- 언어학적 텍스트분석의 또 다른 대안인가?", 독일어문학, 13(1), pp.389~410 (2005), 한국독일어문학회
  9. 이성만, "텍스트언어학의 현황과 전망-텍스트기술의 기본차원들-", 우리말연구, (20), pp.3~50 (2007), 우리말학회
  10. 이성만, "텍스트이해에서 상호텍스트성의 역할", 언어과학연구, (41), pp.171~187 (2007), 언어과학회
  11. 이성만, "상호문화 텍스트언어학의 과제와 전망 - 독일어권 텍스트종류 연구의 동향을 중심으로 -", 독어학, (17), pp.167~195 (2008), 한국독어학회
  12. 이성만, "텍스트언어학과 작문 －독일 작문교육의 경향을 중심으로－", 작문연구, (7), pp.59~105 (2008), 한국작문학회
  13. 이성만, "텍스트유형학의 현황과 과제", 텍스트언어학, 26, pp.1~53 (2009), 한국텍스트언어학회
  14. 이재원, "텍스트언어학 이전사- ‘로고스’, ‘오라티오’, ‘텍스투스’ 그리고 ‘레데’ 개념을 중심으로* -", 텍스트언어학, (16), pp.21~40 (2004), 한국텍스트언어학회
  15. 이정복, "인터넷 통신언어의 이해" (2003), 월인
  16. 조국현, "한국 텍스트언어학 연구에 대한 성찰- 정체성, 연구 내용 및 방법, 성과와 문제점 -", 텍스트언어학, 15, pp.585~612 (2003), 한국텍스트언어학회
  17. 조국현, "인터넷 ‘댓글’의 텍스트유형학적 연구", 텍스트언어학, 2(23), pp.203~230 (2007), 한국텍스트언어학회
  18. 조국현, "온라인 신문의 하이퍼텍스트종류", 텍스트언어학, 27, pp.111~136 (2009), 한국텍스트언어학회
  19. 플렛, "수사학과 텍스트분석" (1977), 동인
  20. 하이네만, "텍스트언어학 입문" (1991), 역락
  21. 한국텍스트언어학회, "텍스트언어학의 이해" (2004), 박이정
  22. Adamzik,K, "Die Zukunft der Text(sorten)linguistik", pp.15~30 (2001), a.a.O.
  23. Adamzik, K, "Textlinguistik" (2004), Eine einführende Darstellung
  24. "Adamzik, K.&Krause, W.D.(Hg.) 2005. Text-Arbeiten, Tübingen", ~ (2005)
  25. "Antos, G. 1982. Grundlagen einer Theorie des Formulierens, Tübingen", ~ (1982)
  26. "Antos, G. & Krings, H.P.(Hg.) 1989. Textproduktion, Tübingen", ~ (1989)
  27. "Antos, G. & Krings, H.P.(Hg.) 1992. Textproduktion, Trier", ~ (1992)
  28. "Antos, G.", Tietz, H.(Hg.) 1997. Die Zukunft der Textlinguistik, Tübingen, 1997
  29. "Antos, G. & Pogner, K.H. 2003. “Kultur- und domänengeprägtes Schreiben” Wierlacher, A.&Bogner, A.(Hg.). Handbuch interkulturelle Germanistik, Stuttgart", Weimar, 396-400, 2003
  30. Baumann, K.D, "Fachtextsorten in Vernetzung", Forum Fachsprachenforschung (2010)
  31. "Beißwenger, M. 2007. Sprachhandlungskoordination in der Chat-Kommunikation, Berlin", ~ (2007)
  32. "Blühdorn, H. 2000. Textverstehen und Intertextualität Blühdorn, H. et al.(Hg.). a.a. O., 277-98", ~ (2000)
  33. "Blühdorn, H. et al.(Hg.) 2006. Text - Verstehen. Grammatik und darüber hinaus, Berlin", ~ (2006)
  34. "Braunmüller, K. 1977. Referenz und Pronominalisierung, Tübingen", ~ (1977)
  35. "Brinker, K. & Antos, G.&Heinemann. W. & Sager, S.F.(Hg.) 2000", 2001. Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. 2 Bde, Berlin, 2000
  36. "Broich, U. 1985. Formen der Markierung von Intertextualität Broich&Pfister(Hg.), a.a.O., 31-47", ~ (1985)
  37. "Broich, U. & Pfister, M.(Hg.) 1985. Intertextualität, Tübingen", ~ (1985)
  38. "Burger, H. 1991. Sprache der Massenmedien, Berlin", ~ (1991)
  39. "Burger, H. 2005. Mediensprache, Berlin", ~ (2005)
  40. "Busch-Lauer, I. 2001. Fachtexte im Kontrast, Frankfurt", M, 2001
  41. "Christmann, U. 2008. Rhetorisch-stilistische Aspekte moderner Verstehens- und Verständlichkeitsforschung Fix, U. et al.(Hg.). Rhetorik und Stilistik. 1. Hb, Berlin, 1092-106", ~ (2008)
  42. "Daneš, F. 1970. Zur linguistischen Analyse der Textstruktur. in: Folia Linguistica 4, 72-8", ~ (1970)
  43. Firbas, J, "On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis", TLP, 1, pp.267~280 (1964)
  44. "Fix, U. 1997. Kanon und Auflösung des Kanons. Typologische Intertextualität Antos", Tietz(Hg.). a.a.O., 97-108, 1997
  45. "Aspekte der Intertexutalität.in:Brinker et al.(Hg.),a.a.O.,449-57", ~ (2000)
  46. "Fix, U. 2006. Was heißt Texte kulturell verstehen? Blühdorn, H. et al.(Hrsg.), a.a.O., 254-76", ~ (2006)
  47. "Fix, U. et al.(Hg.) 2000. Zur Kulturspezifik von Textsorten, Tübingen", ~ (2000)
  48. Gansel, Ch, "Textlinguistik und Textgrammatik" (2007), Eine Einführung
  49. "Genette, G. 1982", 1993. Palimpseste. Die Literatur auf zweiter Studie, Frankfurt, pp.1993, ~
  50. "Gläser, R. 1990. Fachtextsorten im Englischen, Tübingen", ~ (1990)
  51. "Göpferich, S. 1995. Fachtextsorten in Naturwissenschaften und Technik, Tübingen", ~ (1995)
  52. "Göpferich, S. 2008. Textverstehen und Textverständlichkeit Janich, N.(Hg.). a.a.O., 291-312", ~ (2008)
  53. "Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and Conversation Cole, P.&Morgen, J.L.(Hg.). Syntax and Semantics, Bd. 3, New York, 41-58", ~ (1975)
  54. "Harweg, R. 1968. Pronomina und Textkonstitution, München", ~ (1968)
  55. "Hayes, J. & Flower, L.S. 1980, Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes Gregg, L.W. & Steinberg, E.R.(Hg.). Cognitive Processes in Writing, Hillsdale, 3 -30", ~ (1980)
  56. Heidolph, K.E, "Kontextbeziehungen zwischen Sätzen in einer generativen Grammatik", Kybernetika, 2, pp.274~281 (1966)
  57. "Heinemann, W. 1997. Zur Eingrenzung der Intertextualität aus textlinguistischer Sicht. Klein & Fix(Hg.), a.a.O., 21-38", ~ (1997)
  58. "Heinemann, M. & Heinemann, W. 2002. Grundlagen der Textlinguistik, Tübingen", ~ (2002)
  59. "Hepp, A. 1999. Cultural Studies und Medienanalyse, Opladen", ~ (1999)
  60. "Holthuis, S. 1993. Intertextualität, Tübingen", ~ (1993)
  61. Huber, O, "Hyper­Text­Linguistik", pp.2002
  62. "Isenberg, H. 1968. “Überlegungen zur Texttheorie” Ihwe, I.(Hg.), Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik: Ergebnisse und Perspekliven, Frankfurt", M., 150-73, 1968
  63. "Isenberg, H. 1971. “Überlegungen zur Texttheorie.” Ihwe, J.(Hg.). Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik I. Frankfurt", M., 155-72, 1971
  64. "Isenberg, H. 1976. “Einige Grundbegriffe für eine linguistische Texttheorie” Daneš, F.", Viehweger, D.(Hg.), Probleme der Textgrammatik, Berlin, 47-145, 1976
  65. "Jakobs, E.M. 1999. Textvernetzung in den Wissenschaften, Tübingen", ~ (1999)
  66. Jakobs, E.M, "Hypertextsorten", ZGL, 31, pp.232~252 (2003)
  67. "Jakobs, E.M. et al.(Hg.) 1999. Textproduktion: HyperText, Text, KonText, Frankfurt", M, 1999
  68. "Jakobs, E.M.&Lehnen, K.(Hg.) 2008. Berufliches Schreiben, Frankfurt", M, 2008
  69. "Janich, N. 2008. “Intertextualität und Text(sorten)vernetzung” Janich, N.(Hg.). a.a.O., 177-96", ~ (2008)
  70. "Janich, N.(Hg.) 2008. Textlinguistik: 15 Einführungen, Tübingen", ~ (2008)
  71. "Kalverkämper, H.&Baumann, K.D.(Hg.) 1995. Fachliche Textsorten, Tübingen", ~ (1995)
  72. "Klein, J.&Fix, U.(Hg.) 1997. Textbeziehungen, Tübingen", ~ (1997)
  73. "Klein, J. 1991. Politische Textsorten. in: Germanistische Linguistik 106-7, 248-79", ~ (1991)
  74. "Klein, J. 2000. Intertextualität, Geltungsmodus, Texthandlungs- muster. in: Adamzik, K.(Hg.), Textsorten, Tübingen, 31-44", ~ (2000)
  75. "Krause, W.D. 2000. Kommunikationslinguistische Aspekte der Textsorten-bestimmung Krause, W.D.(Hg.), a.a.O., 34-67", ~ (2000)
  76. "Krause(Hg.) 2000. Textsorten. Kommunikationslinguistische und konfrontative Aspekte, Frankfurt", M, 2000
  77. "Kuhlen, R. 1991. Hypertext. Ein nicht­lineares Medium zwischen Buch und Wissensbank, Berlin", ~ (1991)
  78. "Lenk, H.E.H. & Chestermann, A.(Hg.) 2005. Pressetextsorten im Vergleich, Hildesheim", ~ (2005)
  79. "Linke, A. & Nussbaumer, M. 1997. Intertextualität Antos, G.", Tietz, H.(Hg.). a.a.O., 109-26, 1997
  80. "Opilowski, R. 2006. Intertextualität in der Werbung der Printmedien, Frankfurt", M, 2006
  81. "Ostapenko, V. 2007. Vernetzung von Fachtextsorten, Berlin", ~ (2007)
  82. "Pfister, M. 1985. Konzepte der Intertextualität Broich & Pfister(Hg.). a.a.O., 1-30", ~ (1985)
  83. "Rau, H.A. 1988. Kreatives Schreiben an Hochschulen, Tübingen", ~ (1988)
  84. Rehm, G, "Hypertextsorten. Definition, Struktur, Klassifikation", pp.2006
  85. "Sandig, B. 1978. Stilistik. Sprachpragmatische Grundlegung der Stilbeschreibung, Berlin", ~ (1978)
  86. "Sandig, B. 1986. Stilistik der deutschen Sprache, Berlin", ~ (1986)
  87. "Sandig, B. 2000. Text als prototypisches Konzept Mangasser-Wahl, M.(Hg.). Prototypentheorie in der Linguistik, Tübingen, 93-112", ~ (2000)
  88. "Sandig, B. 2006. Textstilistik des Deutschen, Berlin", ~ (2006)
  89. "Schlobinski, P. 1997.“Zur Analyse syntaktischer Strukturen in der gesprochenen Sprache ders.(Hg.). Syntax des gesprochenen Deutsch, Opladen, 1-25", ~ (1997)
  90. "Schmitz, U. 2001. Optische Labyrinthe im digitalen Journalismus Bucher, H.J.", Püschel, U.(Hg.). Die Zeitung zwischen Print und Digitalisierung, Opladen, 207-32, 2001
  91. Schmitz, U, "Deutsche Schriftsprache in hypermedialer Umgebung", ZGL, 31, pp.253~272 (2003)
  92. "Schmitz, U. 2006. Schriftbildsschirme. Tertiäre Schriftlichkeit im World Wide Web Androutsopoulos, J. et al.(Hg.). Neuere Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Internetforschung, Frankfurt", M., 186-87, 185-208, 2006
  93. "Schnotz, W.1985. Elementarische and holistische Theorieansatze zum Textverstehen. Tubingen", ~ (1985)
  94. "Schnotz, W. 1994. Aufbau von Wissensstrukturen, Weinheim", ~ (1994)
  95. "Schnotz, W. 2006. Was geschieht im Kopf des Lesers? Blühdorn, H. et al.(Hg.). a.a.O., 222-238", ~ (2006)
  96. Schutte, W, "Diskursstrukturen in fachlichen Mailingslisten", Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie(OBST), 68, pp.55~75 (2004)
  97. "Siever, T. et al.(Hg.) 2005, Websprache.net. Sprache und Kommunikation im Internet, Berlin", ~ (2005)
  98. "Steinitz, R. 1968. Nominale Pro-Formen, Berlin", ~ (1968)
  99. Stöckl, H, "Typographie: Gewand und Körper des Textes. Linguistische Überlegungen zu typographischer Gestaltung", ZfAL, 41, pp.5~48 (2004)
  100. "Storrer, A. 2000. Was ist »hyper« am Hypertext? Kallmeyer, W.(Hg.), Sprache und neue Medien, Berlin, 222-49", ~ (2000)
  101. Storrer, A, "Kohärenz in Hypertexten", ZGL, 31, pp.274~292 (2003)
  102. "Storrer, A. 2004a. Text und Hypertext Lobin, H.", Lemnitzer, L.(Hg.), Texttechnologie - Perspektiven und Anwendungen. Tübingen, 13-49, 2004
  103. "Storrer, A. 2004b. Hypertext und Texttechnologie Knapp, K. et al.(Hg.). Angewandte Linguistik. Ein Lehrbuch, Tübingen, 207-8", ~ (2004)
  104. "Strohner, H. 2001. Kommunikation, Wiesbaden", ~ (2001)
  105. "Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge", ~ (1990)
  106. "Tegtmeyer, B. 1997. Der Begriff der Intertextualität und seine Fassungen Klein & Fix (Hg.), a.a.O., 49-81", ~ (1997)
  107. "Trumpp, E.C. 1998. Fachtextsorten kontrastiv, Tübingen", ~ (1998)
  108. "Vater, H. 1992. Einführung in die Textlinguistik, München", ~ (1992)
  109. Vollert, "Rezeptions- und Funktionsebenen der konkreten Poesie", pp.1999
  110. "Wanke, I. & Spitzmüller, J.(Hg.) 2008. Methoden der Diskurslinguistik. Berlin", ~ (2008)
  111. Weinrich, H, "Syntax als Dialektik", Poetica, 1, pp.109~126 (1967)
  112. "Weinrich, H. 1993. Textgrammatik der deutschen Sprache, Mannheim", ~ (1993)
  113. "Zifonun, G. et al. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, Berlin", ~ (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

상호텍스트성과 전문텍스트 연구이성만언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2011 · 제59호한국에서의 텍스트언어학 연구 성과 및향후 전망장소원한국텍스트언어학회 · 텍스트언어학2010 · 제29권 텍스트언어학의 탈(脫)언어학화- 한국 텍스트언어학의 미래에 대한 단상 -조국현한국텍스트언어학회 · 텍스트언어학2005 · 제19호텍스트에서 담화로 - 텍스트언어학의 확장 -이성만한국텍스트언어학회 · 텍스트언어학2010 · 제29권 텍스트언어학의 개념과 대상이성만언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2004 · 제1권 제29호질적 연구와 텍스트언어학박용익한국텍스트언어학회 · 텍스트언어학2012 · 제32권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

중국어 회화능력 자동 평가를 위한 시스템 설계김병창, 성윤숙pp. 1-16영어 관용어의 개념적 동기화김주식pp. 17-36EFL 쓰기 오류와 원어민-비원어민강사의 오류수정 비교박선옥pp. 37-58러시아 감정표현소 웃음의 개념화 양상엄순천pp. 59-82“-self”와 “자기”의 화용적 지시성에 관한 연구오명기pp. 83-102
원문 보기