상호텍스트성을 통한 독일 보도문의 이해
Understanding the Intertextuality of German Press Statements
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The understanding of a text can be separated into superficial and concrete understandings. In this paper, I classify these as primary and secondary understanding, but we can understand that generally the understanding of a presented text ends at the primary level. In this paper, I suggest a method of intertextual understanding for supplementing the understanding of texts. For this purpose, in Part Two, following Bühler’s Organon model, which focuses on the expressive, representation, and conative functions, I give examples to show how he conceptualizes intertexual understanding. According to Bühler’s model, you have to presuppose understanding to enhance the conative function, and to improve understanding, we must take into consideration the cultural (and intertextual) aspects. In Part Three, I present the intertextual elements from Vater’s model of textual understanding. He explains that his “structure and understanding of texts” is on three levels: inquiry, cohesion, and horizon. According to Vater, horizon is the aspect of the text that the text user actually understands, and through horizon, the text user understands the text based on several factors considered when the text was produced. According to this model, one of the important factors to be considered is the intertextual factor. I use the intertextual concepts of textual understanding drawn from these two models in Part Four in an attempt at the intertextual understanding of a German press statement. As a result of this analysis, we have confirmed that the intertextuality of texts is essential to constructing a concrete understanding of press statements. We will have to consider intertextual factors when constructing models of understanding texts in order to get at the concrete and precise understanding of a text.
Abstract
The understanding of a text can be separated into superficial and concrete understandings. In this paper, I classify these as primary and secondary understanding, but we can understand that generally the understanding of a presented text ends at the primary level. In this paper, I suggest a method of intertextual understanding for supplementing the understanding of texts. For this purpose, in Part Two, following Bühler’s Organon model, which focuses on the expressive, representation, and conative functions, I give examples to show how he conceptualizes intertexual understanding. According to Bühler’s model, you have to presuppose understanding to enhance the conative function, and to improve understanding, we must take into consideration the cultural (and intertextual) aspects. In Part Three, I present the intertextual elements from Vater’s model of textual understanding. He explains that his “structure and understanding of texts” is on three levels: inquiry, cohesion, and horizon. According to Vater, horizon is the aspect of the text that the text user actually understands, and through horizon, the text user understands the text based on several factors considered when the text was produced. According to this model, one of the important factors to be considered is the intertextual factor. I use the intertextual concepts of textual understanding drawn from these two models in Part Four in an attempt at the intertextual understanding of a German press statement. As a result of this analysis, we have confirmed that the intertextuality of texts is essential to constructing a concrete understanding of press statements. We will have to consider intertextual factors when constructing models of understanding texts in order to get at the concrete and precise understanding of a text.
참고문헌 (32)
- 보그란데, 로버트 알렝 드, "텍스트언어학입문" (1995), 한신문화사
- 브링커, 클라우스, "텍스트의 구조와 이해" (2004), 역락
- 안정오, "텍스트의 이해- 챨스 샌더스 퍼스의 기호관을 중심으로 -", 텍스트언어학, 16, pp.265~288 (2004), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 안정오, "텍스트언어학적 상호텍스트성 연구에 대하여", 독일문학, 53(2), pp.97~124 (2012), 한국독어독문학회[DOI]
- 윤석홍, "신문방송, 취재와 보도" (2000), 나남
- 이성만, "미디어 언어의 텍스트화용론" (2012), 경진
- 파터, 하인츠, "텍스트의 구조와 이해" (2006), 배재대학교출판부
- Bachtin, Michail, "Das literarische Subjekt" (2001), Tuebingen
- Beaugrande, Robert Alain de, "Einführung in die Textlinguistik" (1981), Niemeyer
- Brinker, Klaus., "Linguistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden" (1985), Erich Schmitt Verlag
- Brinker, Klaus., "Textlinguistik" (1993), Groos
- Brinkmann, H., "Die deutsche Sprache. Gestalt und Leistung" (1971)
- Broich, U., "Intertextualität" (1985), Niemeyer
- Bruger, H., "Medien Lesen", pp.71~106 (1999)
- Bühler, Karl., "Sprachtheorie" (1999), Fischer
- Bußmann, Hadumod, "Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft" (2008), Verlag Kröner
- Burger, Harald., "Mediensprache und Medienlinguistik" (2005)
- Fix, Ulla, "Textbeziehungen, Linguistische und literaturwissenschaftliche Beitraege zur Intertextualitaet" (1997)
- Grosse, E. U., "Text und Kommunikation" (1976)
- Gülich, E., "Satz, Text, Sprachliche Handlung", pp.199~268 (1987)
- Harweg, Roland., "Pronomina und Textkonstitution" (1968)
- Heinemann, W., "Textlinguistik" (1991), Niemeyer
- Holthuis, S., "Intertextualität. Aspekte einer rezeptionsorienterten Kozeption" (1993)
- Lüger, H. H., "Presssprache" (1995)
- Motsch, W., "Ebenen der Textstruktur", pp.3~33 (1996)
- Pfister, M., "Intertextualität", pp.1~30 (1985)
- Plett, H., "Intertextuality", pp.3~29 (1991)
- Rickheit, G., "Grundlagen der kognitiven Sprachverarbeitung" (1993)
- Scherner, M., "Sprache als Text" (1984)
- Scherner, M., "Text und Grammatik", pp.317~340 (1994)
- Steyer, K., "Reformulierungen" (1997)
- Vater, Heinz., "Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Struktur und Verstehen von Texten" (2001), Wilhelm Fink Verlag