Forms of Address in Bilingual Lexicography - Focused on French Learners of Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines how forms of address are dealt with in French-Korean and Korean-French dictionaries (respectively, Dong-a’s Prime dictionnaire français-coréen (불한사전), Nouveau dictionnaire coréen-français (새한불사전)) and demonstrates that some words, such as terms of address, are heavily loaded with “shared cultural charge” (Galisson 1988) and thereby, should be brought into sharp focus when compiling bilingual dictionaries. The first section of this paper gives an overview of lexical entries of selected address terms as they are presented in the two aforementioned dictionaries, and which can be classified into three categories (personal pronouns, free forms of address and kinship terms). In the following section, shortcomings these entries present are analysed in depth – from the perspective of a French learner of Korean as a foreign language. These shortcomings are of three types: lexicographic inconsistencies, inaccuracy or incompleteness of equivalents, and lack of sociocultural information. In the last section, I reconsider the issue in the light of pragmatics and “lexiculture” (Galisson 1988) in order to contribute to the revalorization of the status of bilingual dictionaries.
Abstract
This study examines how forms of address are dealt with in French-Korean and Korean-French dictionaries (respectively, Dong-a’s Prime dictionnaire français-coréen, Nouveau dictionnaire coréen-français) and demonstrates that some words, such as terms of address, are heavily loaded with “shared cultural charge” (Galisson 1988) and thereby, should be brought into sharp focus when compiling bilingual dictionaries. The first section of this paper gives an overview of lexical entries of selected address terms as they are presented in the two aforementioned dictionaries, and which can be classified into three categories (personal pronouns, free forms of address and kinship terms). In the following section, shortcomings these entries present are analysed in depth – from the perspective of a French learner of Korean as a foreign language. These shortcomings are of three types: lexicographic inconsistencies, inaccuracy or incompleteness of equivalents, and lack of sociocultural information. In the last section, I reconsider the issue in the light of pragmatics and “lexiculture” (Galisson 1988) in order to contribute to the revalorization of the status of bilingual dictionaries.
참고문헌 (26)
- "표준국어대사전 (The Unabridged Dictionary of Standard Korean)"[URL]
- Barthes, R., "L’empire Des Signes" (1979), Essais
- Brown, L., "Korean Honorifics and Politeness in Second Language Learning" (2011), John Benjamins Publishing
- Brown, R., "Style in Language", pp.253~276 (1960), MIT Press
- Celotti, N., "La Culture Dans les Dictionnaires Bilingues: où, Comment, Laquelle ?", pp.455~466 (2002)
- "Dong-A’s Prime Dictionnaire Français-coréen (불한사전)" (2003), Doosan Dong-A Corporation
- Robert Galisson, "Cultures et lexicultures.Pour une approche dictionnairique de la culture partagée", Annexes des Cahiers de linguistique hispanique médiévale, 7(1), pp.325~341 (1988), PERSEE Program[DOI]
- Heo, JY, "Un Nouveau Dictionnaire Bilingue Coréen-français D’apprentissage", 프랑스어교육, 10, pp.83~101 (2000), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- Hickey, L., "Politeness as Deference: A Pragmatic View", Pragmalinguistica, 2, pp.267~286 (1994)
- Hwang, S. J. J., "Terms of Address in Korean and American Cultures", Intercultural Communication Studies, 2, pp.117~134 (1991)
- Suh Y. Jang, "Korean Culture and the Reentry Motivations Of University-Graduated Women", Adult Education Quarterly, 54(4), pp.273~290 (2004), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- CATHERINE KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI, "Pour une approche contrastive des formes nominales d'adresse", Journal of French Language Studies, 20(01), pp.3~ (2010), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
- Kim, H. M., "Transforming Gender and Development in East Asia", pp.105~122 (2002), Routledge
- Kim-Renaud, Y.-K., "Language Change in East Asia", pp.27~46 (2001), Psychology Press
- King, R., "Korean Language in Culture and Society", pp.101~117 (2006), University of Hawaii Press
- Lee, I., "The Korean Language", pp.224~238 (2000), SUNY Press
- Levinson, S. C., "Pragmatics and Social Deixis: Reclaiming the Notion of Conventional Implicature", Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 5, pp.206~223 (2011)
- Meillassoux, C., "Parler Parenté", L’Homme, 153, pp.153~164 (2000)
- "Nouveau Dictionnaire Coréen-français (새한불사전)", 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- "Portail lexical, Centre National de Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales"[URL]
- Schuwer, M., "Fonction des Équivalences dans un Dictionnaire Bilingue", Asp Online, 3, pp.1~9 (1994)
- Sohn, H. -M., "The Korean Language", pp.407~418 (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Surmont, J. -N. de., "Aux Frontières de la Pragmatique et de la Linguistique. Les Variables de L’information Culturelle dans la Lexicographie Bilingue", Babel, 56(1), pp.19~34 (2010)
- Svensén, B., "A Handbook of Lexicography. The Theory and Practice of Dictionary- Making" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Wiegand, H. E., "Equivalence in Bilingual Lexicography: Criticism and Suggestions", Lexikos, 12, pp.239~255 (2002)
- Yun-Roger, S., "Implicites, Stéréotypes, Imaginaires: La Composante Culturelle en Langue Étrangère", pp.159~170 (2010), Archives Contemporaines