본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한영 문학번역 텍스트에의 Juliane House의 번역품질 평가이론 적용: 사례 연구

A case study of Juliane House’s translation quality assessment of Korean English literature

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study considers Juliane House’s (2015) translation quality assessment (TQA) scheme for Korean-to-English literary translation evaluation. Unlike typical literary translation evaluations, House’s scheme is based on Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) framework, which involves functional aspects of language. This case study is the first to utilize House’s TQA for Korean-to-English translated texts. The results reveal that House’s (2015) TQA has more advantages than disadvantages in terms of evaluating the English translation of Korean texts. We are able to utilize the functional aspects of the texts in cultural and situational contexts as the evaluative elements such as field, tenor, and mode using corpus analysis.

Abstract

This study considers Juliane House’s (2015) translation quality assessment (TQA) scheme for Korean-to-English literary translation evaluation. Unlike typical literary translation evaluations, House’s scheme is based on Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) framework, which involves functional aspects of language. This case study is the first to utilize House’s TQA for Korean-to-English translated texts. The results reveal that House’s (2015) TQA has more advantages than disadvantages in terms of evaluating the English translation of Korean texts. We are able to utilize the functional aspects of the texts in cultural and situational contexts as the evaluative elements such as field, tenor, and mode using corpus analysis.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 성초림, "문학번역 평가의 시대, 무엇이 좋은 번역인가?", 세계문학비교연구, (42), pp.173~192 (2013), 세계문학비교학회
  2. 안정한, "시스템 - 기능언어학 사용역 이론의 양방향적 특이성을 활용한 번역품질평가", 언어학연구, 21(1), pp.79~98 (2016), 한국언어연구학회
  3. 영미문학연구회 번역평가사업단, "영미 명작, 좋은 번역을 찾아서" (2005), 창비
  4. 이상원, "문학번역 평가 어떻게 할 것인가?", 번역학연구, 9(2), pp.149~166 (2008), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  5. 이은숙, "문학번역평가에 대한 고찰: 충실성을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 13(2), pp.109~126 (2011), 한국통역번역학회
  6. 이형진, "미국의 문학번역 평가제도 사례연구 - 번역상과 번역지원을 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 15, pp.363~388 (2011), 통번역연구소
  7. 이형진, "한국문학 번역의 문화번역 — 한국문학의 문화번역 지점을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 17(3), pp.139~164 (2016), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  8. 정인호, "체계기능언어학 기반 한영 문학번역 문체 연구", 박사, pp.2022
  9. 조성원, "번역평가 기준으로서의 ‘충실성’과 ‘가독성’에 대하여", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (23), pp.96~119 (2007), 영미문학연구회
  10. 문학번역 평가시스템 연구, "한국문학번역원", 한국문학번역원, ~ (2007)
  11. 한무숙, "월운" (1956), 정음사
  12. Halliday, M., "Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar" (2014), Routledge
  13. House, J., "Translation quality assessment : Linguistic description versus social evaluation", Meta : Translators' Journal, 46(2), pp.243~257 (2001)
  14. House, J., "Translation quality assessment: Past and present" (2015), Routledge
  15. Kim, Y., "Gendered landscapes" (2015), Cornell University East Aisa Program
  16. O’ Donnell, M, "UAM corpus tool version 3.0", ~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)