본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

변형적 입법과정의 확대와 미국 정당정치

Increase in Unorthodox Lawmaking and American Party Politics

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This article describes a historical increase since the late 20th century in unorthodox lawmaking in the U.S. legislative process, and interprets it as a sign of intensified partisan competitions between Democratic and Republican members of Congress. Unorthodox lawmaking, exceptionally rare in the previous ‘Textbook Congress’ predominated by strong standing committees, involves such procedural measures as multiple referral of bills, bypassing the committee with jurisdiction, post-committee adjustment, applying restrictive rules during floor deliberation, resorting to filibusters and cloture votes, devising omnibus bills, and bill readjustment in legislative-executive “summit” meetings. The rapid rise of unorthodox lawmaking clearly encroaches on a hegemonic power of committees as the centers of lawmaking, and signifies complex dynamics of intense party politics as a crucial driving force for legislative process. Party leaders of both majority and minority sides, it is speculated, might have found unorthodox procedural practices politically convenient in pursuing their respective legislative agenda. Unorthodox lawmaking, in this sense, is a strategic outcome of party competition, and party collusion to a degree, between majority and minority parties. The relative success of unorthodox procedural measures in producing legislations highlights a positive contribution that unorthodox lawmaking may bring to American legislative politics.

Abstract

This article describes a historical increase since the late 20th century in unorthodox lawmaking in the U.S. legislative process, and interprets it as a sign of intensified partisan competitions between Democratic and Republican members of Congress. Unorthodox lawmaking, exceptionally rare in the previous ‘Textbook Congress’ predominated by strong standing committees, involves such procedural measures as multiple referral of bills, bypassing the committee with jurisdiction, post-committee adjustment, applying restrictive rules during floor deliberation, resorting to filibusters and cloture votes, devising omnibus bills, and bill readjustment in legislative-executive “summit” meetings. The rapid rise of unorthodox lawmaking clearly encroaches on a hegemonic power of committees as the centers of lawmaking, and signifies complex dynamics of intense party politics as a crucial driving force for legislative process. Party leaders of both majority and minority sides, it is speculated, might have found unorthodox procedural practices politically convenient in pursuing their respective legislative agenda. Unorthodox lawmaking, in this sense, is a strategic outcome of party competition, and party collusion to a degree, between majority and minority parties. The relative success of unorthodox procedural measures in producing legislations highlights a positive contribution that unorthodox lawmaking may bring to American legislative politics.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Aldrich, John, "Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
  2. Aldrich, John, "The Consequences of Party Organization in the House: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties in Conditional Party Government : Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era" (2000), CQ Press
  3. Arrow, Kenneth, "Social Choice and Individual Values" (1951), Wiley
  4. Binder, Sarah A., "Congress, the Executive, and the Production of Public Policy: United We Govern? in:Congress Reconsidered. 7th edition" (2001), Congress Reconsidered. 7th edition
  5. Binder, Sarah A., "Going Nowhere: A Gridlocked Congress?", The Brookings Review, 18(1) (2000)
  6. "Assessing the 110th Congress, Anticipating the 111th"[URL]
  7. Bowler, Shaun, "Parties in Legislatures: Two Competing Explanations In: Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies" (2000), Oxford University Press
  8. Brady, David W., "Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making" (1988), Stanford University Press
  9. Cooper, Joseph, "From Congressional to Presidential Preeminence: Power and Politics in Late Nineteenth-Century America and Today In: Congress Reconsidered. 8th edition" (2005), CQ Press
  10. Cooper, Joseph, "The Twentieth-Century Congress In: Congress Reconsidered. 7th Edition" (2001), CQ Press
  11. Cox, Gary., "On the Effects of Legislative Rules In: Legislatures: Comparative Perspectives on Representative Assemblies", Originally in Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25(2) (2002)
  12. Cox, Gary., "The Efficient Secret. Cambridge" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  13. Cox, Gary W., "Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House" (1993), University of California Press
  14. Davidson, Roger, "Congressional Parties, Leaders, and Committees: 1900, 2000, and Beyond In: American Political Parties: Decline or Resurgence" (2001), CQ Press
  15. Davidson, Roger H., "Congress and Its Members. 10th edition" (2006), CQ Press
  16. Dodd, Lawrence C., "Re-envisioning Congress: Theoretical Perspectives on Congressional Change-2004 In: Congress Reconsidered. 8th edition" (2004), CQ Press
  17. Downs,Anthony, "An Economic Theory of Democracy" (1957), Harper & Row
  18. Fenno, Richard F, "Congressmen in Committees" (1973), Little, Brown and Company
  19. Fiorina, Morris P., "The Decline of Collective Responsibility in American Politics", Daedalus, 109 (1980)
  20. Fiorina, Morris P., "Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment" (1977), Yale University Press
  21. Fleisher, Richard, "Partisanship and the President's Quest for Votes on the Floor of Congress in: Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era" (2000), CQ Press
  22. Gerring, John, "Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  23. Huntington, Samuel P., "Congressional Responses to the Twentieth Century In: The Congress and America’s Future. 2nd edition" (1973), Prentice-Hall
  24. Jacobson, Gary C., "Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection In: Polarized Politics" (2000), CQ Press
  25. Krehbiel, Keith, "Information and Legislative Organization" (1991), The University of Michigan Press
  26. Laver, Michael, "Divided Parties, Divided Government", Legislative Studies Quarterly, 24(1) (1999)
  27. Maass, Arthur, "Congress and the Common Good" (1983), Basic Books
  28. Mann, Thomas E., "The Broken Branch" (2006), Oxford University Press
  29. Matthews, Donald R., "U.S. Senators and Their World" (1960), University of North Carolina Press
  30. Mayhew, Daivd R., "Congress: The Electoral Connection" (1974), Yale University Press
  31. Ornstein, Norman J., "Vital Statistics on Congress, 2008." (2008), Brookings Institution Press
  32. Pew Research Center, "Evenly Divided and Increasingly Polarized: 2004 Political Landscape" (2003)
  33. Polsby, Nelson W., "The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives", American Political Science Review, 62 (1968)
  34. Polsby, Nelson W., "How Congress Evolves: Social Bases of Institutional Change" (2004), Oxford University Press
  35. Rohde, David, "Parties and Leaders in the Post-reform House" (1991), University of Chicago Press
  36. Schickler, Eric, "Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress" (2001), Princeton University Press
  37. Schwartz, Thomas, "Votes, Strategies, and Institutions: An Introduction to the Theory of Collective Choice. In: Congress: Structure and Policy" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  38. Shepsle, Kenneth, "The Changing Textbook Congress In: Can the Government Govern?" (1989), The Brookings Institution
  39. Sinclair, Barbara, "Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. 3rd edition" (2007), CQ Press
  40. Sinclair, Barbara, "Hostile Partners: The President, Congress, and Lawmaking in the Partisan 1990s In: Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era" (2000), CQ Press
  41. Smith,Steven S., "Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate" (1989), The Brookings Institution
  42. Stewart, Charles, "Analyzing Congress" (2001), W. W. Norton & Company
  43. Strm, Kaare, "Parties at the Core of Government In: Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies" (2000), Oxford University Press
  44. Thies, Michael F., "On the Primacy of Party in Government: Why Legislative Parties Can Survive Party Decline in the Electorate In: Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies" (2000), Oxford University Press
  45. Wilson, Woodrow, "Congressional Government" (1963), Houghton-Mifflin

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)