중국어 부사어와 보어의 대비분석 - 한중 상호 번역과 교학을 중심으로 -
Analysis of the order of Chinese adverb and complement
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The structure of events expressed by language also has similar structures in both spatio-temporal angles, and can be the most fundamental criterion for humans to differentiate objects. As we sometimes grasp syntax content through translation in foreign language learning, we tend to recognize events and understand content in our native language mindset. In order to understand different cultural reasons, it is important to approach them with more fundamental human reasons and look at events more objectively. Also, for that objective consideration, although it may be accessible through proven philosophical methods, and using formulas such as formalized natural sciences, engineering, and social phenomena may be one way. The text attempts to distinguish the difference in meaning between Chinese syntactic adverbs and bores, which are translated from Korean to adverbs, to be logical, more natural, and complete the syntax in Korean. In the semantic information expressed by the two identical components located before and after the predicate at the angle of time, there is a difference in subjectivity that the speaker's intention reveals, but there is no bore in Korean, so you can see the difference between various adverbs. Although translating Chinese bores into adverbs in Korean becomes a more natural expression, it is another way to choose the appropriate adverbs or compare different ways through syntactic conversion. However, what we need to look at here is that there is another limitation to the characteristics of Korean adverbs in the translation and the meaning of the adverbs or adjectives that are paraphrased. In other words, it is necessary to consider whether the adverb used in Korean does not distinguish between Chinese adverb and Bohr in terms of subjectivity and harmony. This is because there are also various types of Korean adverbs, and the functional and flamboyant differences revealed through word order in Chinese syntax can naturally be selected as suitable adverbs for the content in Korean translation.
Abstract
The structure of events expressed by language also has similar structures in both spatio-temporal angles, and can be the most fundamental criterion for humans to differentiate objects. As we sometimes grasp syntax content through translation in foreign language learning, we tend to recognize events and understand content in our native language mindset. In order to understand different cultural reasons, it is important to approach them with more fundamental human reasons and look at events more objectively. Also, for that objective consideration, although it may be accessible through proven philosophical methods, and using formulas such as formalized natural sciences, engineering, and social phenomena may be one way. The text attempts to distinguish the difference in meaning between Chinese syntactic adverbs and bores, which are translated from Korean to adverbs, to be logical, more natural, and complete the syntax in Korean. In the semantic information expressed by the two identical components located before and after the predicate at the angle of time, there is a difference in subjectivity that the speaker's intention reveals, but there is no bore in Korean, so you can see the difference between various adverbs. Although translating Chinese bores into adverbs in Korean becomes a more natural expression, it is another way to choose the appropriate adverbs or compare different ways through syntactic conversion. However, what we need to look at here is that there is another limitation to the characteristics of Korean adverbs in the translation and the meaning of the adverbs or adjectives that are paraphrased. In other words, it is necessary to consider whether the adverb used in Korean does not distinguish between Chinese adverb and Bohr in terms of subjectivity and harmony. This is because there are also various types of Korean adverbs, and the functional and flamboyant differences revealed through word order in Chinese syntax can naturally be selected as suitable adverbs for the content in Korean translation.
참고문헌 (10)
- 김정필, "한중 유의한자어의 어순구조와 동의성 비교분석", 동북아 문화연구, 1(45), pp.187~202 (2015), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 남궁양석, "현대중국어 어순의 정보구조와 초점" (2008), 한국학술정보
- 박기현, "중국어문법론" (2011), 인제대학교출판부
- 刘月华, "趨向補語通釋" (1998), 北京大学出版社
- 이운재, "인지언어학과 중국어 어순" (2014), 도서출판 역락
- 鍾 潔, "한국어와 중국어의 합성어 구조연구" (2014), 역락
- 朱庆明, "시험지존중국어어법" (2007), 시사중국어사
- 齐沪扬, "现代汉语空间问题研究" (1998), 学林出版社
- 桥本万太郎, "언어지리유형학" (1990), 학고방
- "표준국어대사전", 국립국어원[URL]
