한국어 형용사 부사어의 중국어 번역시 선택제약 연구
Constraint on translating Korean adjectives working as adverbial into Chinese
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this paper is explore the constraint on translating Korean adjectives working as adverbial into Chinese, especially the degree compliment. When we translate Korea adjectives working as adverbial into Chinese, some points should be considered as below. First of all, syntactic approach should be considered. Korean adjectives working as adverbial generally can be translate into the degree compliment or the conclusive compliment in Chinese. If sperker’s intention is judgment, we have to translate it into the degree compliment. Second, semantic approach should be considered. If Korean adjectives working as adverbial mean ‘process’, we can translate it into Chinese adverbial phrase. If Korean adjectives working as adverbial mean ‘result’, we have to translate it into the degree compliment or conclusive compliment on Chinese. Third, semantic orientation should be considered. If the semantic orientation of Korean adjectives working as adverbial is not agent, action or patient, we can hardly translate it into the degree compliment. Fourth, we should consider that Korean adjectives working as adverbial mean realization aspect or non realization aspect. If it is non realization aspect, we can hardly translate it into the degree compliment.
Abstract
The objective of this paper is explore the constraint on translating Korean adjectives working as adverbial into Chinese, especially the degree compliment. When we translate Korea adjectives working as adverbial into Chinese, some points should be considered as below. First of all, syntactic approach should be considered. Korean adjectives working as adverbial generally can be translate into the degree compliment or the conclusive compliment in Chinese. If sperker’s intention is judgment, we have to translate it into the degree compliment. Second, semantic approach should be considered. If Korean adjectives working as adverbial mean ‘process’, we can translate it into Chinese adverbial phrase. If Korean adjectives working as adverbial mean ‘result’, we have to translate it into the degree compliment or conclusive compliment on Chinese. Third, semantic orientation should be considered. If the semantic orientation of Korean adjectives working as adverbial is not agent, action or patient, we can hardly translate it into the degree compliment. Fourth, we should consider that Korean adjectives working as adverbial mean realization aspect or non realization aspect. If it is non realization aspect, we can hardly translate it into the degree compliment.
참고문헌 (23)
- 강재은, "한국학생의 정도보어·상태보어 활용 실태 및 오류분석", 중국어교육, pp.2005
- 金京勳, "現代國語 副詞語 硏究", 박사, 국어학, pp.1996
- 김기범, "중국어에서의 한국어 부사어 ‘빨리, 빠르게’ 대응위치", 외국어교육연구논집, (20) (2004)
- 김기범, "현대중국어 이음절 형용사와 서술어와의 결합 특성 연구 : 부사어와 보어 기능을 중심으로", 박사, 중어중문학과 어학전공, pp.2013
- 김선희, "현대중국어의 정도보어 연구", pp.2007
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2000), 탑출판사
- 남주경, "한국어 부사어의 중국어 표현 방식 연구", 석사, 어학, pp.2001
- 류영록, "한중번역교본" (2002), 연변대학출판사
- 박소영, "결과부사형 ‘-게’에 대한 연구", 한글, 252 (2001), 한글학회
- 박종한, "중국어의 비밀" (2012), 궁리
- 신경숙, "엄마를 부탁해" (2008), 창작과비평사
- 윤서희, "이음절 형용사보어 문장에서의 의미지향", 중국어문학, (57), pp.389~414 (2011), 영남중국어문학회
- 이상도, "현대중국어 정도보어의 해석", 중국언어연구, 2 (1993), 중국언어연구회, 학고방
- 이종희, "부사형 어미 {-게}의 통어적 기능에 관한 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1992
- 임채훈, "‘형용사+게’ 부사어의 문장 의미 구성", 國語學, (49), pp.159~188 (2007), 국어학회
- 차영란, "부사어의 한중 번역 양상에 관한 연구", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.2003
- 蔡連康, "現代 韓國語 連結語尾에 對한 硏究", 박사, pp.1985
- 姜春华, "现代汉语状态补语与程度补语研究", 박사, pp.2005
- 金哉延, "汉语补语与韩国语对应成分关系的探讨", 석사, pp.2009
- 李明淑, "现代汉语形容词作状语现象研究", 박사, pp.2009
- 柳英绿, "朝汉语语法对比" (1999), 延边大学出版社
- 薛 舟, "寻找母亲" (2010), 人民文学出版社
- 张国宪, "现代汉语形容词功能与认知研究" (2006), 商务印书馆
