한중번역에 나타나는 부사어 번역유형 고찰–황석영의 <삼포 가는 길> 중역본을 중심으로
A Study on Adverbs Translation Types in Korean-Chinese Translation–As for the Chinese translation of Hwang Seok-young's “Way to Sampo”
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The adverb of the original Korean was reviewed to see how it was translated into Chinese. Vocabulary is a universal ingredient in language, but it is translated into various forms according to the habits of language expression, meaning of context, and mathematical relation of components. This paper focused on the translation patterns of adverbs in the Korean and Chinese translations. The majority of cases in the analysis result translation is the same as in the original. However, when personality changes, sometimes meaning changes, also account for more than 40 percent. Except where these types of changes are omitted and disappear, they are as follows: It may be converted into a predicate element in a sentence, into a bore associated with a predicate, or into a tubular phrase of an object formula. As such, it is possible to produce translation results that sometimes change the meaning of the adverb components of the original text due to the autonomy given to the translators. The autonomy of translators is the right and duty given to not produce unnatural results, tied to formal equivalence. Translators implement a variety of translation methods to preserve meaning but to implement natural sentences. This paper looked at the various ways of translating the adverb, with a fraction of the translation result of the novel. Despite the fact that it is a certain ingredient, various aspects have emerged, and despite the various aspects, it shows a certain regularity that is centered around the predicate. Based on this, the causes of diversity and regularity can be found in the linguistic differences between the original and the translation. These considerations and results attempt to give a qualitative explanation of the changes before and after translation. Based on this, we expect that standards will be created for reference in translation learning and translation practice.
Abstract
The adverb of the original Korean was reviewed to see how it was translated into Chinese. Vocabulary is a universal ingredient in language, but it is translated into various forms according to the habits of language expression, meaning of context, and mathematical relation of components. This paper focused on the translation patterns of adverbs in the Korean and Chinese translations. The majority of cases in the analysis result translation is the same as in the original. However, when personality changes, sometimes meaning changes, also account for more than 40 percent. Except where these types of changes are omitted and disappear, they are as follows: It may be converted into a predicate element in a sentence, into a bore associated with a predicate, or into a tubular phrase of an object formula. As such, it is possible to produce translation results that sometimes change the meaning of the adverb components of the original text due to the autonomy given to the translators. The autonomy of translators is the right and duty given to not produce unnatural results, tied to formal equivalence. Translators implement a variety of translation methods to preserve meaning but to implement natural sentences. This paper looked at the various ways of translating the adverb, with a fraction of the translation result of the novel. Despite the fact that it is a certain ingredient, various aspects have emerged, and despite the various aspects, it shows a certain regularity that is centered around the predicate. Based on this, the causes of diversity and regularity can be found in the linguistic differences between the original and the translation. These considerations and results attempt to give a qualitative explanation of the changes before and after translation. Based on this, we expect that standards will be created for reference in translation learning and translation practice.
참고문헌 (9)
- 박옥수, "한영 문학 번역에 드러난 직유의 번역", 동아인문학, (24), pp.235~260 (2013), 동아인문학회
- 박옥수, "문학번역에서 직유 표현의 형식과 내용의 반영-오영수의 <메아리> 번역 분석에 근거해서-", 동아인문학, (32), pp.143~172 (2015), 동아인문학회
- 신지언, "중한 번역의 충실성 고찰― 苏童의 『妻妾成群』을 중심으로 어휘 대응어 비교", 중국어문학논집, (66), pp.177~198 (2011), 중국어문학연구회
- 이창수, "황석영 저, ‘삼포 가는 길’에 나타난 자유직접화법 번역양상에 관한 코퍼스 기반 연구", 번역학연구, 18(2), pp.151~169 (2017), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 鄭賢淑, "<森浦가는 길>의 文體 硏究", 어문연구(語文硏究), 30(2), pp.191~212 (2002), 한국어문교육연구회
- 지광신, "독일어와 한국어 언어쌍 번역에서의 부사의 문제", 외국어로서의 독일어, (21), pp.183~204 (2007), 한국독일어교육학회
- 차영란, "한중 번역에서 부사어와 서술어의 관련성에 대한 연구", 이중언어학, (24), pp.241~265 (2004), 이중언어학회
- 황석영, "돼지꿈: 황석영 소설집" (2005), 민음사
- 金承鈺, "韩国现代小说选" (2009), 人民文学出版社
