본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

보어에 나타난 한국인 중국어 학습자의 오류 분석- ‘跑得快’의 중한번역 사례를 중심으로

Analyzing the Error Patterns of Korean Learners in Using Chinese Complements

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

In this article, we argue for the relationship between two kinds of Chinese complements: state and possibility. It is very hard for Korean students who study Chinese to understand the fundamental concept of these complements due to their ambiguity. Specially, the same form V得C can be translated differently, according to the specific type of complement. The state complement and the possibility complement can both take the V得C form, so that '他跑得快' includes both meanings when it comes to be translated into Korean. In order to resolve this ambiguity, we proposed semantic features for each complement type. Furthermore, we did a survey of these Chinese complements with thirty-six Korean leaners whose fluency in Chinese was above average. Through the survey results, we were able to see that most Korean leaners cannot distinguish between the two complements. We then organized a Chinese-Korean translation questionnaire. This helped to explain Chinese complements concisely to the learner. We also explained why the Korean leaner finds it hard to learn the Chinese complement. After translating it into another language, the constituent complement is changed to the adjunct constituent, and that creates a problem when trying to understand a Chinese complement and when classifying the type of complement. This investigation could provide a method for teaching the Chinese complement without creating ambiguous sentences.

Abstract

In this article, we argue for the relationship between two kinds of Chinese complements: state and possibility. It is very hard for Korean students who study Chinese to understand the fundamental concept of these complements due to their ambiguity. Specially, the same form V得C can be translated differently, according to the specific type of complement. The state complement and the possibility complement can both take the V得C form, so that '他跑得快' includes both meanings when it comes to be translated into Korean. In order to resolve this ambiguity, we proposed semantic features for each complement type. Furthermore, we did a survey of these Chinese complements with thirty-six Korean leaners whose fluency in Chinese was above average. Through the survey results, we were able to see that most Korean leaners cannot distinguish between the two complements. We then organized a Chinese-Korean translation questionnaire. This helped to explain Chinese complements concisely to the learner. We also explained why the Korean leaner finds it hard to learn the Chinese complement. After translating it into another language, the constituent complement is changed to the adjunct constituent, and that creates a problem when trying to understand a Chinese complement and when classifying the type of complement. This investigation could provide a method for teaching the Chinese complement without creating ambiguous sentences.

참고문헌 (7)

  1. 김윤정, "가능보어의 수동자 중심 양상 의미에 대한 인지적 분석", 박사, 중국어학, pp.2006
  2. 김혜경, "현대중국어 ‘가능’ 양상사(Modal) 분석 -문법화의 관점에서-", 중국어교육과 연구, (16), pp.245~268 (2012), 한국중국어교육학회
  3. 이우철, "중국어 가능보어에 대한 재인식", 중국인문과학, (37), pp.185~201 (2007), 중국인문학회
  4. 이은화, "중국어 정도보어의 한국어 대응형식과 한국인 학습자의 정도보어 습득의 상관관계 연구", 중국어문논총, (51), pp.49~75 (2011), 중국어문연구회
  5. 임영학, "教學을 위한 中韓翻譯의 實際Ⅱ-정도보어를 중심으로", 경북외국어테크노대학논문집 (2001)
  6. 윤유정, "현대중국어 보어 분류 제 문제 고찰", 중국언어연구, (26), pp.269~299 (2008), 한국중국언어학회
  7. 최재영, "‘得’의 문법화 연구-‘得’의 의미들 간의 인접성을 중심으로-", 언어와언어학, (41), pp.249~273 (2008), 언어연구소

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)