이용활성화를 위한 사적복제보상금제도 - 녹음 및 녹화의 방법에 따른 사적복제의 경우를 중심으로 -
Private Copying Levy for Extended Exploitation of Copyrighted Works - Focused on Private Copying by Recording -
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Digital Environment has made us hard to distinguish an original work from its digital copies. Its digital copies are identical to the original work in terms of their quality. In this regard, legal regulation can hardly control distribution of the unauthorized copies in digital environment. Also, private copying tariff will help copyright-related industry grow. Hence, most of EU member countries have adopted private copying levy system. So did Japan. However, what kind of blank media and equipments for recording are subject to private copying levy varies depending on each country's legal and economic environment. Germany is the first country in Europe which introduced private copying tariff system. German Copyright Act imposes private copying levy on manufacturers or importers, or on resellers in special circumstances. On the other hand, Japan allows collecting societies to collect private copying tariff from users of copyrighted works. But, in reality, private copying tariff has been imposed upon the manufacturers or importers of media or equipments for recording. In conclusion, this Article emphasizes that private copying levy need to be imposed upon the manufacturers or importers of media or equipments for recordings than upon their users.
Abstract
Digital Environment has made us hard to distinguish an original work from its digital copies. Its digital copies are identical to the original work in terms of their quality. In this regard, legal regulation can hardly control distribution of the unauthorized copies in digital environment. Also, private copying tariff will help copyright-related industry grow. Hence, most of EU member countries have adopted private copying levy system. So did Japan. However, what kind of blank media and equipments for recording are subject to private copying levy varies depending on each country's legal and economic environment. Germany is the first country in Europe which introduced private copying tariff system. German Copyright Act imposes private copying levy on manufacturers or importers, or on resellers in special circumstances. On the other hand, Japan allows collecting societies to collect private copying tariff from users of copyrighted works. But, in reality, private copying tariff has been imposed upon the manufacturers or importers of media or equipments for recording. In conclusion, this Article emphasizes that private copying levy need to be imposed upon the manufacturers or importers of media or equipments for recordings than upon their users.
참고문헌 (32)
- 디지털 환경하의 사적 복제 문제에 관한 비교법적 고찰, "김현철", 저작권심의조정위원회, ~, pp.저작권연구자료41 (2004)
- 이해완, "저작권법", pp.449~ (2007), 박영사
- "저작권보호센터, “해외 저작권보호 동향 한 눈에”, 보도자료 2009년 12월 29일", ~ (2009)
- Aaron L. Melville, "Note, the Future of the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992: Has It Survived the Millennium Bug?", B.U.J.Sci. & Tech.L., 7(372), pp.372~ (2001)
- Alex Allemann, "Note, Manifestation of an AHRA Malfunction: The Uncertain Status of MP3 Under Recording Industry Association of America v. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc", Tex. L. Rev., 79(189) (2000)
- "Background Document: ‘Fair Compensation for Acts of Private Copying’, Brussels, 14", 02, pp.2008 (2008), ~
- Benton, J. Gaffney, "Copyright Statutes that Regulate Technology: A Comparative Analysis of the Audio Home Recording Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act", Wash. L. Rev., 75(611) (2000)
- "BITKOM, press release of 26 January 2006"[URL]
- Brendan M. Schulman, "Note, The Song Heard 'Round the World: The Copyright Implications of MP3s and the Future of Digital Music", Harv. J. L. & Tech., 12(589) (1999)
- "Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 5 July 2001, 51 ZR 335", 98 GRUR 2002, 246, 2002
- "Bundesgerichtshof, Press Statement No 186/2007"[URL]
- "Bundesgerichtshof, Press statement No 186/2007"[URL]
- C.H. Dobal, "Note, A Proposal to Amend the Cable Compulsory License Provisions of the 1976 Copyright Act", S.Cal. L. Rev., 61(699), pp.703~707 (1988)
- "CopySwede, Private Copying Ley in Sweden 2006 Collection and Distribution: A Report from CopySwede 47 (2006)"[URL]
- Daniel A. Crane, "Intellectual Liability", Tex. L. Rev., 88(253) (2009)
- Darren Keith Henning, "Copyright's Dues Ex Machina: Reverse Registration as Economic Fostering of Orphan Works", J. Copyright Soc'y U.S.A., 55(201) (2008)
- David Nimmer, "Ignoring the Public (pt. 1)", UCLA Ent. L. Rev., 7(189), pp.189~194 (2000)
- GESAC, Second Call for Comments, "Fair Compensation for Acts of PrivateCopying", Brussels, 18, pp.3~ (2008)
- James A. Swaney, "Common Property, Reciprocity, and Community", J. Econ., 24(451), pp.451~453 (1990)
- J.A.L. Sterling, "World Copyright Law", ~ (2007)
- Jason Berman, "The Audio Home Recording Act of 1991: A Road to Compromise", Ent. L. Rev., 3(64) (1992)
- Joseph P. Liu, "Regulatory Copyright", N.C.L. Rev., 87, pp.94~114 (2004)
- Marilyn S. Wise, "Trials of The Tribunal: Toward a Fair Distribution of Jukebox Royalties", Sw. U. L. Rev., 16(757) (1986)
- S. Holmes, "Paying the Price: the Levies System in Action", pp.16~ (2004), Copyright World
- Stichting de Thuiskopie, "International Survey on Private Copying Law & Practice", ~ (2005)
- Stichting de Thuiskopie, "International Survey on Private Copying Law & Practice", 20th Revision, pp.49~ (2009)
- Timothy Wu, "Copyright's Communications Policy", Mich. L. Rev., 103(278), pp.302~304 (2004)
- T. Koskinen-Olsson, "The Notion of Private Copying in Nordic Copying Legislation", Jour. Copyr. Soc'y, 49(1003) (2002)
- Zachary Williams, "Hometaping in the Twenty-First Century: Updating the Audio Home Recording Act to Address Emerging Technologies", AIPLA Q.J., 36(77) (2008)
- 文化庁, "著作権法入門" (2008), CRIC