일본판 공정이용조항의 도입 논의
Discussion on the Introduction of Japanese Fair Use
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korea and Japan copyright legal systems take the civil law approach, also the reasons to limit the rights of copyright are also legally enumerated also so that a creator can predict the limitation of the rights. Therefore, when the copyright is limited, it is not available for the court to limit the copyrights by considering each case other than the reasons enumerated in the copyright law. As a result, even if the use of a work that does not correspond to the legal limitation does not hurt the interests of owners as long as there is no permission from the copyright owner, the act is formally equivalent to infringement. However, there is a question about that the conventionally 'fair use' is considered as the infringement because the act does not correspond to the statutory limitations. In Japan, it has also been interpreted that copyrights are strictly limited on special request such as the public interest work. Accordingly, the use of copyrighted works which would otherwise be copyright infringement shall be restricted to the cases enumerated in the law. Until now, Japanese copyright law has corresponded to the use of a work requiring a new limitation, by creating a new limitation or revising the law. However, because the copyright limitations are provided for the adjustment of interests between copyright owners and users in order to conform to the promotion of the culture, the limitations must be interpreted not strictly but reasonably. This brought about the discussion of the introduction of 'fair use'. This article will examine the Japanese-version Fair Use on the ground of the final report submitted by the Agency for Cultural Affairs.
Abstract
Korea and Japan copyright legal systems take the civil law approach, also the reasons to limit the rights of copyright are also legally enumerated also so that a creator can predict the limitation of the rights. Therefore, when the copyright is limited, it is not available for the court to limit the copyrights by considering each case other than the reasons enumerated in the copyright law. As a result, even if the use of a work that does not correspond to the legal limitation does not hurt the interests of owners as long as there is no permission from the copyright owner, the act is formally equivalent to infringement. However, there is a question about that the conventionally 'fair use' is considered as the infringement because the act does not correspond to the statutory limitations. In Japan, it has also been interpreted that copyrights are strictly limited on special request such as the public interest work. Accordingly, the use of copyrighted works which would otherwise be copyright infringement shall be restricted to the cases enumerated in the law. Until now, Japanese copyright law has corresponded to the use of a work requiring a new limitation, by creating a new limitation or revising the law. However, because the copyright limitations are provided for the adjustment of interests between copyright owners and users in order to conform to the promotion of the culture, the limitations must be interpreted not strictly but reasonably. This brought about the discussion of the introduction of 'fair use'. This article will examine the Japanese-version Fair Use on the ground of the final report submitted by the Agency for Cultural Affairs.
참고문헌 (38)
- 이상정, "저작권법개설" (2011), 세창출판사
- 남형두, "저작권법 주해" (2007), 박영사
- 윤선희, "지적재산권법(12정판)" (2011), 세창출판사
- 남형두, "저작권법 주해" (2007), 박영사
- 남형두, "저작권법 주해" (2007), 박영사
- 저작권법 일부개정법률안 검토보고서, "국회 문화체육관광방송통신위원회", ~ (2009)
- 김경숙, "UCC와 공정이용법리에 관한 미국 판례법리의 전개 -렌즈사건을 통해 본 DMCA상 공정이용의 새로운 해석", 계간 저작권, 22(2), pp.122~144 (2009), 한국저작권위원회
- 김경숙, "UCC 복제․전송의 중단 및 재개와 관련한 ‘소명’요건의 검토 - “손담비의 ‘미쳤어’사건”과 “렌즈사건”의 비교를 통하여 -", 재산법연구, 27(3), pp.569~605 (2011), 한국재산법학회
- 문화관광부, "인용에 관한 의식조사 연구: 저작권의 보호와 활용을 위하여", 문화관광부 (2005)
- 민경재, "저작권법상 공정이용(Fair Use)에 대한 아시아의 대응 - 중국, 일본, 대만, 싱가폴을 중심으로", 법학논총, 31(2), pp.491~529 (2011), 법학연구소
- 박준우, "공정이용법리의 기원과 의의 - 퍼블릭도메인의 확보를 위한 공정이용규정의 제안 -", 법학논총, 29(2), pp.123~140 (2009), 법학연구소
- 서계원, "공정이용 법리(fair use)의 국내법 편입에 대한 실증적 연구", 법학연구, 51(4), pp.159~192 (2010), 법학연구소
- 육소영, "저작물의 공정이용에 관한 법리와 경제학적 분석: 개정 저작권법의 분석을 포함하여", 경제법연구, 5(1) (2006)
- 이대희, "저작권법상의 공정이용 법리에 대한 비교법적 연구", 경영법률, 10 (2000)
- 장춘익, "디지털 환경은 '공정이용fair use'을 무효화하는가-디지털 환경에서의 저작권", 철학, 69 (2001)
- 천영세, "공정이용 활성화를 위한 저작권법 개정안 소개", 지적재산권, 12 (2006)
- 최원석, "디지털저작물의 공정이용에 관한 소고", 동아법학, (44), pp.287~314 (2009), 법학연구소
- 加戸守, "著作権法逐条講義 五訂新版" (2006), 著作権情報センター
- 田村善之, "著作権法" (2001), 有斐閣
- 山本隆司, "フェア・ユースの考え方" (2010), 太田出版
- 上野達, "著作権法における権利制限規定の再検討－日本版フェアユースの可能ｺ性－", コピライト, (560) (2008)
- 田村善之, "技術環境の変化に対応した著作権の制限の可能!性について", ジュリスト, (1255) (2003)
- 田村善之, "繪畵のオ-クションサイトへの畵像揭載載と著作權法", 知財管理, 56(９) (2006)
- 田村善之, "著作権法32条1項の 引用 法理の現代的意義", コピライと, (554) (2007)
- 田村善之, "法敎育と著作權-政策形成過程のバイアス矯正としての放任との相剋", ジュリスト, (1404) (2010)
- 高林龍, "新・裁判実務大系22著作権関係訴訟法" (2004), 青林書院
- 茶園成樹, "引用 の要件について", コピライト, (565) (2008)
- デジタル・ネット時代における知財制度の在り方について（報告), "知的財産戦略本部デジタル", ~ (2008)
- 法的環境動向に関する調査研究 著作権リフォーム ̶コンテ ンツの創造・保護・活用の好循環の実現に向けて, "財団法人デジタルコンテンツ協会", ~ (2008)
- 島並良, "権利制限の立法形式", 著作権研究, (35) (2008)
- 著作物の流通・契約システムの調査研究『著作権制度における権利制限規定に関する調査研究』報告書, "三菱ＵＦＪリサーチ", ~ (2009)
- 文化審議会著作権分科会, "文化審議会著作権分科会報告書" (2009), 文化庁
- 権利制限の一般規定ワーキングチーム報告書, "文化審議会著作権分科会法制問題小委員会", 文化庁, ~ (2010)
- 文化審議会著作権分科会法制問題小委員会, "権利制限の一般規定に関する中間まとめ(案)" (2010), 文化庁
- 文化審議会著作権分科会法制問題小委員会, "権利制限の一般規定に関する報告書(案)" (2010), 文化庁
- 横山久芳, "著作権の制限とフェア・ユースについて", パテント, 62 (2009)
- Jonathan Griffiths, "Preserving Judicial Freedom of Movement Interpreting Fair Dealing in Copyright Law" (2000), Sweet&Maxwell Ltd
- Jane C. Ginsburg, "The Concept of Authorship in Comparative Copyright Law", DePaul L. Rev, pp.1063~ (2003)