현행 저작권법상 ‘복제’ 정의의 변천에 따른 법리 검토
A Review on the Legal Definition of 'Reproduction' in Korean Copyright Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The word 'reproduction' literally means making a copy, close imitation, duplication of a picture, sound, writing, etc. The term 'reproduction' contains the meaning of the fixation in a tangible medium in each country's Copyright Act. The difference of two usages can be known when they are applied in the case of copying something whether or not in a material object. The definition of 'reproduction' was first introduced in Copyright Revision of 1986 in Korea, and provided that it was the duplication of copyrighted work with material object. It has been defined as "the fixation in a tangible medium or the duplication of copyrighted work with material object" since the Copyright Revision in 2000. The existing definition has an error as there are two types. The problem rises as two types of definitions are applied to cases, which results in different interpretation after classifying it as a fixation or duplication. The article explores the legal interpretation and the legislative method in order to solve the problems from the definition of 'reproduction' in Copyright Act of Korea. Legally speaking, the fixation in a tangible medium includes duplication, photocopying, recording, printing, and even copying to a hard-disk. The statutory language 'reproduction' should be interpreted only to the fixation in a tangible medium of expression rather than the duplication in one of the two ways based on the 'reproduction' definition. Also, it is necessary to revise the definition of 'reproduction' only to the fixation in a tangible medium, regardless of the duplication of copyrighted work with material object.
Abstract
The word 'reproduction' literally means making a copy, close imitation, duplication of a picture, sound, writing, etc. The term 'reproduction' contains the meaning of the fixation in a tangible medium in each country's Copyright Act. The difference of two usages can be known when they are applied in the case of copying something whether or not in a material object. The definition of 'reproduction' was first introduced in Copyright Revision of 1986 in Korea, and provided that it was the duplication of copyrighted work with material object. It has been defined as "the fixation in a tangible medium or the duplication of copyrighted work with material object" since the Copyright Revision in 2000. The existing definition has an error as there are two types. The problem rises as two types of definitions are applied to cases, which results in different interpretation after classifying it as a fixation or duplication. The article explores the legal interpretation and the legislative method in order to solve the problems from the definition of 'reproduction' in Copyright Act of Korea. Legally speaking, the fixation in a tangible medium includes duplication, photocopying, recording, printing, and even copying to a hard-disk. The statutory language 'reproduction' should be interpreted only to the fixation in a tangible medium of expression rather than the duplication in one of the two ways based on the 'reproduction' definition. Also, it is necessary to revise the definition of 'reproduction' only to the fixation in a tangible medium, regardless of the duplication of copyrighted work with material object.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김태훈, "개정 저작권법 해설", 계간 저작권, (49) (2000)
- 문화체육관광부, "개정 저작권법 해설서", ~ (2012)
- 박성호, "저작권법 개정 공청회 - 종합토론 요약", 계간 저작권, (47) (1999)
- 박성호, "1986년 저작권법에서의 저작재산권 보호규정과 그 이후 전개된 입법적 변천에 관한 고찰", 계간 저작권, 25(4), pp.91~115 (2012), 한국저작권위원회
- 배대헌, "냅스터(Napster) 사례에서 드러난 인터넷상 정보공유의 한계", 산업재산권, (10) (2001)
- 저작재산권의 변화에 대한 연혁적 연구, "배대헌", 한국저작권위원회, ~ (2016)
- 오승종, "저작권법" (2005), 박영사
- 이상정, "저작권법 개정 방향에 관한 관건", 지적소유권법연구, 2 (1998)
- 이상정, "디지털 시대의 저작권법 개정 방향에 관한 소고", 계간 저작권, (41) (1998)
- 임원선, "실무자를 위한 저작권법" (2017), 한국저작권위원회
- 장인숙, "저작권법개론" (1960), 교학도서주식회사
- 정상조, "저작권법 주해" (2007), 박영사
- 한국언론재단, "세계의 언론법제" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스(주)
- 허희성, "저작권법개설" (1977), 태양출판사
- 허희성, "신고저작권법개설" (1982), 범우사
- 허희성, "신저작권법축조개설" (1988), 범우사
- 황적인, "저작권법" (1988), 범문사
- 高橋和之, "インターネットと法" (1999), 有斐閣
- 島並良, "著作權法入門" (2014), 有斐閣
- 小島喜一郞, "著作物の保護範囲の確定について", 專修法學論集, (103) (2008)
- 齊藤博, "著作權法" (2007), 有斐閣
- 中山信弘, "저작권법" (2008), 법문사
- 土肥一史, "知的財産法入門" (2006), 中央經濟社
- Lion Bently, "Intellectual Property Law" (2014), Oxford University Press
- Mary LaFrance, "Copyright Law", pp.2008, Thomson
- Marshall Leaffer, "Understanding Copyright Law" (2005), LexisNexis
- Ulrich Loewenheim, "Handbuch des Urheberrechts" (2003), C. H. Beck
- Stephen M, "McJohn" (2006), Copyright
- Arthur R. Miller, "Intellectual Property" (2000), West
- Nimmer and Nimmer, "Nimmer on Copyright" (2006), LexisNexis
- Sam Ricketson, "Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works: 1886-1986" (1987), Kluwer
- Edward Samuels, "Copyright" (2000), St. Martin's Press
- Roger E. Schechter, "Intellectual property: The Law of Copyrights, Patents and Trademarks" (2003), West
- J.A.L. Sterling, "World Copyright Law" (2005), Sweet&Maxwell
- Richard Stim, "Intellectual property" (2001), West