스코포스 이론과 해석 이론 -공통점과 차이점에 대한 고찰-
Skopos theory and Interpretive theory: Similarities and differences
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to contemplate and compare the two theories that constitute a core component in the development of the Translation Studies: the Skopos theory and the Interpretive theory. These two theories, which were advocated and developed mainly by professional translators and interpreters, place emphasis on the target texts or the target language. Another common ground they share is that they are considered by many as the ‘General Theories’, which are to explicate varied aspects of both interpretation and translation. This paper intends to gain insights into the similarities and differences between these two important theories. It consists of two parts. The first part explores how the working experiences of professional interpreters and translators were formulated into the significant theories. The second part compares the premises behind these two theories and reflects on how the Interpretive Theory which started as a theory of interpretation and the Skopos Theory as a theory of translation have evolved into the ‘General Theories.’
Abstract
This paper aims to contemplate and compare the two theories that constitute a core component in the development of the Translation Studies: the Skopos theory and the Interpretive theory. These two theories, which were advocated and developed mainly by professional translators and interpreters, place emphasis on the target texts or the target language. Another common ground they share is that they are considered by many as the ‘General Theories’, which are to explicate varied aspects of both interpretation and translation. This paper intends to gain insights into the similarities and differences between these two important theories. It consists of two parts. The first part explores how the working experiences of professional interpreters and translators were formulated into the significant theories. The second part compares the premises behind these two theories and reflects on how the Interpretive Theory which started as a theory of interpretation and the Skopos Theory as a theory of translation have evolved into the ‘General Theories.’
참고문헌 (17)
- Durieux. C, "전문번역 어떻게 가르칠 것인가" (2003), 고려대학교 출판부
- Reiß, K, "일반 통번역 이론 기초" (2010), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 이향, "해석이론의 특징과 한계", 번역학연구, 10(1), pp.121~140 (2009), 한국번역학회
- Lederer, M, "번역의 오늘: 해석 이론" (2001), 고려대학교 출판부
- 주진국, "번역행위의 목적성" (2006), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 정혜연, "통역학개론" (2008), 한국문화사
- 정호정, "제대로 된 통역번역의 이해" (2007), 한국문화사
- 김혜림, "번역학 발전사" (2010), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- Berman, A, "La traduction et ses discours", Meta, 34(4), pp.672~679 (1989)
- Delisle, J, "L'analyse du discours comme méthode de traduction: Initiation à la traduction française de textes pragmatiques anglais" (1980), Ottawa: Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa
- Holmes, J. S, "The name and Nature of translation studies in Papers on Literary Translation and Translation studies", pp.66~88 (1988), Amsterdam: Rodopi
- Israël, F, "Traduction littéraire et Théorie du sens in Etudes traductologiques", pp.29~43 (1990), Paris: Minard
- Israël, F, "La théorie interprétative de la traduction I: Genèse et Développement" (2005), Paris & Caen: Lettres Modernes Minard
- Kopp, R. K, "Hans J. Vermeer (24 September 1930-4 February 2010): a thinker and his work", Translation Studies, 3(3), pp.375~377 (2010)
- Ladmiral, J. R, "Traduire: théorèmes pour la traduction" (1994), Paris: Gallimard
- Pöchhacker, F, "The role of theory in Simultaneous interpreting in Teaching translation and interpreting: training talent and experience", pp.211~220 (1992), Amsterdam&Philadelphia: John Benjamins
- Seleskovitch, D, "Interpréter pour traduire" (1993), Paris: Didier Erudition
