본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

번역 연구와 언어 이론

Translation Studies and Linguistic Theories

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

There are definitions and theories concerning translation. But they all seem to have one goal in common: good translation. This paper examines modern linguistic theories and their relations to translation methodologies. Futhermore, the paper examines the role of translator under these considerations. The various opinions of linguists and translation theorists presented here shows that meaningful translation is born through the harmonious integration of different definitions. In short, meaningful translation studies form a domain of reconciliation. Translation studies has to be managed and performed under strict guidelines, and to this effect linguistics may offer various possibilities to open new fields of methodologies where translation is concerned. Language has become an indispensable element in our existence, but like the air we breathe we do not recognize its virtues. Linguistic studies analyzes the structure of everyday language, while, literary works - personal artistic works - are the object of analyses for the literary studies. However, literary studies do not directly concern itself with literary creations. In the same manner, translation studies are not directly associated with the actual practice of translation. Because we consider translation as an integral part of the human linguistic activity, methodologies in translation should reflect linguistic methodologies. The paper's intention is to show the variety of possibilities, on how basic linguistic notions and translation theories can be utilized for translation works and its ensuing results. Accordingly, translation studies can be considered as an integral domain, where translation methodologies and linguistic theories are closely connected to each other.

Abstract

There are definitions and theories concerning translation. But they all seem to have one goal in common: good translation. This paper examines modern linguistic theories and their relations to translation methodologies. Futhermore, the paper examines the role of translator under these considerations. The various opinions of linguists and translation theorists presented here shows that meaningful translation is born through the harmonious integration of different definitions. In short, meaningful translation studies form a domain of reconciliation. Translation studies has to be managed and performed under strict guidelines, and to this effect linguistics may offer various possibilities to open new fields of methodologies where translation is concerned. Language has become an indispensable element in our existence, but like the air we breathe we do not recognize its virtues. Linguistic studies analyzes the structure of everyday language, while, literary works - personal artistic works - are the object of analyses for the literary studies. However, literary studies do not directly concern itself with literary creations. In the same manner, translation studies are not directly associated with the actual practice of translation. Because we consider translation as an integral part of the human linguistic activity, methodologies in translation should reflect linguistic methodologies. The paper's intention is to show the variety of possibilities, on how basic linguistic notions and translation theories can be utilized for translation works and its ensuing results. Accordingly, translation studies can be considered as an integral domain, where translation methodologies and linguistic theories are closely connected to each other.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Rowling (J. K.), "Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone" (2001), Bloomsbury
  2. Rowling (J. K.), "Harry Potter, A l’école des sorciers" (1998), Gallimard
  3. Rowling (J. K.), "해리포터와 마법사의 돌" (2003), 문화수첩 리틀북스
  4. Saint-Exupéry, "Le Petit Prince" (1946), Gallimard
  5. Saint-Exupéry, "어린王子" (1973), 문예출판사
  6. Saint-Exupéry, "어린왕자" (1982), 문예출판
  7. Saint-Exupéry, "어린왕자" (2007), 문학동네
  8. Saint-Exupéry, "어린왕자" (2006), 보물창고
  9. Werber, Bernard, "Le rire du Cyclope" (2010), Albin Michel
  10. Werber, Bernard, "웃음 1" (2011), 열린책들
  11. 박정준, "프랑스어 부정관사와 정관사의 의미와 번역", 人文科學硏究, 28, pp.5~37 (2010), 인문과학연구소
  12. 박정준, "등가를 통한 번역의 이론과 구성 요소 분석", 비교문화연구, 19, pp.251~270 (2010), 비교문화연구소
  13. 박정준, "번역의 이상과 번역의 분석", 인문언어, 12(1), pp.167~184 (2010), 국제언어인문학회
  14. 벤야민, 월터, "번역가의 과제", 번역비평, (창간), pp.186~198 (2007)
  15. 레더러 마리엔, "‘대응’과 ‘등가’ : 언어차원의 번역과 담화 차원의 번역, In 통번역과 등가", pp.13~32 (2004)
  16. Benjamin, Walter, "The task of the translator, In The Translation Studies Reader", pp.15~25 (2000), Routledge
  17. Benveniste, Emile, "Tendances récentes en linguistique générale, In Problèmes de linguistique générale I", pp.3~17 (1966), Gallimard
  18. Derrida, Jacques, "Qu’est-ce qu’une traduction “relevante?”" (2005), L’Herne
  19. Derrida, Jacques, "What Is a “Relevant” Translaton?", Critical Inquiry, 27, pp.174~200 (2001)
  20. Français-Anglais, "Dictionnaire Anglais-Français", pp.1996, Harrap’s Shorter
  21. Jakobson, Roman, "On Linguistic Aspects of Translation, In The Translation Studies Reader", pp.113~118 (2000), Routledge
  22. Lederer, Marianne, "La traduction aujourd’hui" (1994), Hachette
  23. Le nouveau Petit Robert, "Dictionnaires Le Robert", ~ (1993)
  24. Lewis, Philip E., "The Measure of Translation Effects, In Difference in Translation", pp.31~62 (1985), Cornell University Press
  25. Martinet, André, "Eléments de linguistique générale. Nouvelle édition remaniée et mise à jour" (1980), Armand Colin
  26. Munday, Jeremy, "Introducing Translation Studies, Theories and applications" (2001), Routledge
  27. Nida, Eugene, "Principles of Correspondence, In The Translation Studies Reader", pp.126~140 (2000), Routledge
  28. Pergnier, Maurice, "Les fondements sociolinguisitques de la traduction. Edition remaniée" (1993), Presses universitaires de Lille
  29. Saussure, Ferdinand de, "Cours de linguistique générale" (1971), Payot
  30. Venuti, Lawrence, "Translating Derrida on Translation: Relevance and Disciplinary Resistance", The Yale Journal of Criticism, 16(2), pp.237~262 (2003)
  31. Vinay, J.-P., "Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Nouvelleédition revue et corrigée" (1977), Didier

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)