2차적 저작물로서의 통역: 법률 검토 및 통역사 인식과 침해 경험에 대한 설문조사
Interpretation as Derivative Works: Overview of Legal Conventions and Interpreter Survey on Copyright Infringement
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Interpretation as Derivative Works: Overview of Legal Conventions and Interpreter Survey on Copyright Infringement. Choi, Eunah (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) This study investigates the issue of copyright in interpretation and interpretation as derivative works. The international and domestic institutions that provide legal framework for the protection of interpreters’ copyright are investigated followed by an online questionnaire that was conducted on 73 conference interpreters in Korea. Composed of ten questions, the questionnaire aimed to investigate if Korean interpreters understood their legal rights and whether they had experienced copyright infringement in their course of work. Questions were also asked to find out how they had addressed cases of infringement and, in the case of those who chose not to claim their rights, reasons why they chose to keep silent. It was found that many respondents were not aware that their interpretations were subject to protection by related laws, and that infringement of copyright was prevalent. Issues such as pirated recordings made by conference participants were raised. Also interpreters who did not claim their rights responded that they did so due to reasons such as future relationship with their clients, as well as ignorance of the issue on the part of the interpreter.
Abstract
Interpretation as Derivative Works: Overview of Legal Conventions and Interpreter Survey on Copyright Infringement. Choi, Eunah (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) This study investigates the issue of copyright in interpretation and interpretation as derivative works. The international and domestic institutions that provide legal framework for the protection of interpreters’ copyright are investigated followed by an online questionnaire that was conducted on 73 conference interpreters in Korea. Composed of ten questions, the questionnaire aimed to investigate if Korean interpreters understood their legal rights and whether they had experienced copyright infringement in their course of work. Questions were also asked to find out how they had addressed cases of infringement and, in the case of those who chose not to claim their rights, reasons why they chose to keep silent. It was found that many respondents were not aware that their interpretations were subject to protection by related laws, and that infringement of copyright was prevalent. Issues such as pirated recordings made by conference participants were raised. Also interpreters who did not claim their rights responded that they did so due to reasons such as future relationship with their clients, as well as ignorance of the issue on the part of the interpreter.
참고문헌 (12)
- 신재호, "2차적저작물의 개념 및 법적 취급에 관한 검토", 창작과 권리, (65), pp.57~88 (2011), 세창출판사
- 오승종, "2차적 저작물과 저작권 침해", 성균관법학, 12, pp.167~200 (2000)
- 임덕기, "2차적저작물 작성의 활성화를 위한 저작권법 개정에 관한 연구 : 공정이용과 저작인격권을 중심으로", 박사, 지적재산권법, pp.2010
- 임원선, "교사를 위한 저작권" (2003), 저작권심의조정위원회
- 최종철, "공무원을 위한 저작권" (2009), 한국저작권위원회
- "지식재산권 용어 사전" (2005), 특허청[URL]
- 홍승기, "사례로 보는 저작권: 공연예술편" (2015), (재)예술경영지원센터
- "Memorandum concerning the use of recordings of interpretation at conferences" (1999)[URL]
- Basalamah, S., "The thorn of translation in the side of the law : toward ethical copyright and translation rights", The Translator, 7(2), pp.155~167 (2001)
- Basalamah, S., "Copyright law and translation : crossing epistemologies", The Translator, 20(3), pp.396~410 (2014)
- Venuti, L., "The scandals of translation: For an ethics of difference" (1998), Routledge
- Venuti, L., "The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation" (2008), Routledge