저작권법의 관점에서 본 번역의 창작성
Creative Properties of Translation Recognized by Korean Courts Under Copyright Laws
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Copyright protection is granted to reward artists and writers for their creative efforts. Therefore, creativity is the very foundation on which copyright is protected. In this age of the fourth industrial revolution, copyright of translated texts is an important issue for both users and developers of machine translation, since they need to secure translation data to enhance machine translation’s quality. Creativity is also important to human translators, as it is what they can differentiate themselves from machine translation. In recognition of such significance of translation’s creativity, this paper analyzes Korean court rulings on translation copyrights to understand how the courts assessed creative qualities of translated texts. The results show that the courts ruled that translated texts are creative, when the texts had substantial similarity with original texts, were produced with mental efforts exerted by translators, and showed creative qualities that were distinctive enough for the translated texts to be generally understood as being new and different from the source texts. Copyright laws have long been criticized in translation studies for treating translation as mere derivatives of original texts with limited originality or creativity. However, the findings of the study show that the Korean courts have applied clear criteria to determine whether translated texts are creative or not.
Abstract
Copyright protection is granted to reward artists and writers for their creative efforts. Therefore, creativity is the very foundation on which copyright is protected. In this age of the fourth industrial revolution, copyright of translated texts is an important issue for both users and developers of machine translation, since they need to secure translation data to enhance machine translation’s quality. Creativity is also important to human translators, as it is what they can differentiate themselves from machine translation. In recognition of such significance of translation’s creativity, this paper analyzes Korean court rulings on translation copyrights to understand how the courts assessed creative qualities of translated texts. The results show that the courts ruled that translated texts are creative, when the texts had substantial similarity with original texts, were produced with mental efforts exerted by translators, and showed creative qualities that were distinctive enough for the translated texts to be generally understood as being new and different from the source texts. Copyright laws have long been criticized in translation studies for treating translation as mere derivatives of original texts with limited originality or creativity. However, the findings of the study show that the Korean courts have applied clear criteria to determine whether translated texts are creative or not.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강현조, "한국근대소설 형성 동인으로서의 번역ㆍ번안 －근대초기 번역ㆍ번안소설의 전개 양상을 중심으로－", 한국근대문학연구, (26), pp.7~39 (2012), 한국근대문학회
- 김병철, "한국근대번역문학사연구" (1975), 을유문화사
- 권정희, "식민지 조선의 번역", 번안의 위치—1910년대 저작권법을 중심으로—, 2010, pp.(28), 297~320[DOI]
- 권정희, "번역", 번안의 분기-『장한몽』과‘번안의 독창성(originality)’, 2013, pp.39, 83~120[DOI]
- 김진숙, "번역강의실에서의 의사소통—석사과정생들의 번역브리프와 번역의 관계에 관한 실행연구", 번역학연구, 13(2), pp.41~63 (2012), 한국번역학회
- 남석순, "1910년대 신소설의 저작권 연구–저작권의 혼란과 매매 관행의 원인을 중심으로–", 동양학, (43), pp.1~27 (2008), 동양학연구원
- 노현숙, "이차적저작물과 원저작물의 시장관계에 관한 연구 - 경쟁 또는 보완관계를 중심으로 -", 법학논총, 29, pp.241~271 (2013), 법학연구소
- 민경재, "서양에서의 저작권법 성립 역사에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 33(2), pp.285~317 (2013), 법학연구소
- 방효순, "일제시대 저작권 제도의 정착과정에 관한 연구", 서지학연구, 21, pp.215~250 (2001)
- 손성준, "한국 근대소설과 번역·창작의 복합주체 – 염상섭과 현진건의 통속소설 번역과 그 이후", 한국현대문학연구, (47), pp.45~85 (2015), 한국현대문학회
- 영미문학연구회 번역평가사업단, "영미명작, 좋은 번역을 찾아서" (2005), 창비
- 오승종, "저작권법" (2012), 박영사
- 유정화, "러시아 문학 유입기의 번안과 번역", 한국노어노문학회 학술대회발표집, pp.211~225 (2014)
- 윤선경, "창작과 번역의 모호한 경계", 외국문학연구, (61), pp.237~256 (2016), 외국문학연구소
- 이근화, "정지용의 영문시 번역과 시 창작의 상관성 연구", Journal of korean Culture, 24, pp.147~170 (2013), 한국어문학국제학술포럼
- 정근식, "식민지적 검열의 역사적 기원 - 1904~1910년", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (64), pp.1~46 (2003), 한국사회사학회
- 정혜영, "번역과 근대적 문체의 형성 - 1918년부터 1921년까지 김동성의 번역 및 창작 과정을 중심으로", 외국문학연구, (59), pp.355~384 (2015), 외국문학연구소
- 정혜용, "번역, 공동의 글쓰기- 표절 현상 속의 번역 규범", 비교한국학 Comparative Korean Studies, 22(1), pp.55~74 (2014), 국제비교한국학회
- 조중환, "번역회고", 삼천리, 6(9) (1934)
- 조중환, "번역 회고-<장한몽>과 <쌍옥루>", 삼천리, 6(9), pp.234~ (1934)
- 프랑스 명작소설 번역평가 결과보고서, "프랑스 명작소설 번역평가 사업단", ~ (2011)
- 한기형, "식민지 검열장의 성격과 근대 텍스트", 민족문학사연구, (34), pp.416~446 (2007), 민족문학사학회
- 최성윤, "근대 초기 서사 텍스트의 저작, 번역, 번안 개념에 관한 고찰 - 근대 초기 신문연재소설을 중심으로", 한국문학이론과 비평, 17(2), pp.219~240 (2013), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- Basalamah, S., "Translation Reflections, Refractions, Transformations" (2007), John Benjamins
- Bassnett, S., "Translation Studies" (2002), Routledge
- Fraser, J., "Mapping the process of translation", Meta : Translators' Journal, 41(1), pp.84~96 (1996)
- Gavronsky, S., "The translator : From piety to cannibalism", Sub-Stance, 16, pp.53~62 (1977)
- Jensen, M. N., "Professional Translators’ Establishment of Skopos - A ‘Brief’Study", master, pp.2009
- Joyce, C., "Copyright Law" (2006), LexisNexis
- Kasirer, N., "Francois Geny’s Libre recherche scientifique as a guide for legal translation", Louisiana Law Review, 61(2), pp.331~352 (2001)
- Benjamin, W., "Theories of Translation: An Anthology of Essays from Dryden to Derrida" (1992), Univeristy of Chicago Publishing
- Yoon, S. K., "Popularising Homer: E. V. Rieu’s English prose translations", The Translator, 20(2), pp.178~193 (2014)
- Venuti, L., "Translation, Authorship, Copyright", The Translator, 1(1), pp.1~24 (1995)
- "국가법령정보센터"[URL]
- 현진건, "격공생, 발전 서문", 조선일보, ~ (1920)
- "演藝界", 매일신보, ~ (1912)
- "『형제』 예고", 매일신보, ~ (1914)