‘南道コリア’의 일본어 번역 오류에 관한 연구 -상적 표현 및 그 외의 문법적 오류사례 분석을 중심으로-
A Study on the Korean-into-Japanese Mistranslations in Namdo Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study analyzes grammatical errors in Korean-into-Japanese translations in the Internet portal site Namdo Korea, which promotes tourism in and culture of Gwangju and other areas around Jeollanam-do. In particular, we focus on frequently-made errors and mistakes in the Japanese text regarding aspectual expressions, bound nouns, and postpositional particles. Through this study, we discovered that the main reason these errors are made is because most translators do not fully understand the aspectual meanings of adnominal endings in adnominal clauses in Korean aspectual expressions. As a result, they fail to use Japanese aspectual expressions equivalent to Korean ones. Furthermore, most errors concerning bound nouns result from the fact that the translators do not clearly recognize the various forms and uses of the Japanese bound noun equivalent to the Korean “Geot”, which only appears in one form. As for the errors about postpositional particles, translators do not adequately interpret the various grammatical functions and uses of Japanese adverbial particles in Korean. As a result of this, the latter language does not have the equivalent functions and uses of its adverbial particles like the former. Therefore, translators seem unable to use Japanese postpositional particles equivalent to Korean ones, which causes grammatical errors.
Abstract
The present study analyzes grammatical errors in Korean-into-Japanese translations in the Internet portal site Namdo Korea, which promotes tourism in and culture of Gwangju and other areas around Jeollanam-do. In particular, we focus on frequently-made errors and mistakes in the Japanese text regarding aspectual expressions, bound nouns, and postpositional particles. Through this study, we discovered that the main reason these errors are made is because most translators do not fully understand the aspectual meanings of adnominal endings in adnominal clauses in Korean aspectual expressions. As a result, they fail to use Japanese aspectual expressions equivalent to Korean ones. Furthermore, most errors concerning bound nouns result from the fact that the translators do not clearly recognize the various forms and uses of the Japanese bound noun equivalent to the Korean “Geot”, which only appears in one form. As for the errors about postpositional particles, translators do not adequately interpret the various grammatical functions and uses of Japanese adverbial particles in Korean. As a result of this, the latter language does not have the equivalent functions and uses of its adverbial particles like the former. Therefore, translators seem unable to use Japanese postpositional particles equivalent to Korean ones, which causes grammatical errors.
참고문헌 (10)
- 庵功雄, "初級を教える人のための日本語文法ハンドブック", pp.116~121 (2000), スリーエーネットワーク
- 大森晃, "接続節における要求表現:並列節と補足節", 情報処理学, pp.5~6 (2010), 日本情報処理学会
- 佐冶圭三, "「の」の本質-「こと」「もの」との対比から-", 日本語學, 12(11) (1993)
- 砂川有里子, "日本語文型辞典" (1998), くろしお出版
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味" (1984), くろしお出版
- 森田良行, "日本語の類義表現辞典" (2006), 東京党出版
- 남기심, "國語文法의 時制問題에 關한 硏究" (1981), 塔出版社
- 남기심, "국어 조사의 용법" (1993), 서광학술자료사
- 서정수, "국어 문법" (1994), 뿌리깊은나무
- 정의상, "광주·전남관광문화포털 ‘南道コリア’ 의 일본어번역상의 문제점 -태(Voice)관련 표현의 오류 분석을 중심으로-", 日本語文學, 1(43), pp.135~154 (2009), 한국일본어문학회
