법정 담화의 부가의문문에 대한 영한 번역 전략
English-Korean Translation Strategies for Tag Questions in Courtroom Discourse
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigates the function of English tag questions in courtroom discourse and explores English-Korean translation strategies effective to acquire ‘functional equivalence’ by comparing a legal thriller Presumed Innocent with its three Korean translations. The general purpose of questions is for the speaker to ask the listener to provide new information about what he wants to know. In court discourse, however, questions are often used for the speaker (the prosecutor or the attorney) to present some information already known to him in front of the judge and/or the jurors on purpose and to ask the listener (witness) to confirm, agree, or acknowledge the information, in order to win the trial. English tag questions are a very useful tool for this function, but they are translated into Korean by using other structures since there are no tag questions in Korean. Therefore, this paper explores how to translate English tag questions in courtroom discourse, focusing on their functions.
Abstract
This paper investigates the function of English tag questions in courtroom discourse and explores English-Korean translation strategies effective to acquire ‘functional equivalence’ by comparing a legal thriller Presumed Innocent with its three Korean translations. The general purpose of questions is for the speaker to ask the listener to provide new information about what he wants to know. In court discourse, however, questions are often used for the speaker (the prosecutor or the attorney) to present some information already known to him in front of the judge and/or the jurors on purpose and to ask the listener (witness) to confirm, agree, or acknowledge the information, in order to win the trial. English tag questions are a very useful tool for this function, but they are translated into Korean by using other structures since there are no tag questions in Korean. Therefore, this paper explores how to translate English tag questions in courtroom discourse, focusing on their functions.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김정인, "의문형 종결어미 ‘-지’의 의미·화용적 기능의 분화", 어문연구, 97, pp.31~48 (2018), 어문연구학회[DOI]
- 김혜영, "영한 번역의 종결어미 사용 연구", 통번역교육연구, 17(2), pp.133~162 (2019), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
- John Gibbons, "법언어학 입문: 사법 제도의 언어" (2020), ㈜집문당
- 이해윤, "법언어학의 이해" (2020), 도서출판 역락
- 임동훈, "한국어의 문장 유형과 용법", 國語學, (60), pp.323~359 (2011), 국어학회[DOI]
- 원은하, "『앵무새 죽이기』의 법정대화 번역전략 분석: 호칭어를 중심으로", 통번역교육연구, 20(1), pp.137~157 (2022), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
- Bax, Stephen, "Discourse and Genre: Analysing Language in Context" (2018), Springer Nature Limited
- Cooke, M., "Language in Evidence: Issues Confronting Aboriginal and Multicultural Australia", pp.55~96 (1995), University of New South Wales Press
- De Waard, J., "From One Language to Another: Functional Equivalence in Bible Translation" (1986), Thomas Nelson Inc
- Gibbons, John, "Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System" (2003), Blackwell
- Grice, Paul, "Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Loftus, Elizabeth, "Eyewitness Testimony" (1979), Harvard University Press
- Christo Moskovsky, "Questions in Natural and Artificial Languages", Journal of Universal Language, 7(2), pp.65~120 (2006), 언어연구소
- Nida, Eugene A., "The Theory and Practice of Translation, With Special Reference to Bible Translating" (1969), Brill
- Romero, Maribel, "The Oxford Handbook of Negation" (2020), Oxford Handbooks
- Turow Scott, "Presumed Innocent" (1987), Warner Books
- 정성호, "의혹" (1991), 태성
- 최승자, "무죄추정" (1991), 대흥
- 한정아, "무죄추정" (2007), ㈜황금가지