경찰통역 담화에서 의문문 유형과 기능: 제도대화의 특징을 중심으로
Types and functions of interrogative sentences in the interpreting of police-suspect interviews: Focused on the features of institutional talk
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study intends to examine the types and functions of interrogative sentences used in the interpreting of police-suspect interview discourse in Korea. The findings of this analysis are as follows: First, the Korean police usually employed wh-interrogative sentences to ask for information from foreign suspects while using negative yes-no questions or declarative questions to refute the statements of foreign suspects. This attests to the fact that police officers use different types of interrogative sentences based on their investigation strategies. Second, foreign suspects made a number of questions about the intention of police officers’ questions or others. In particular, they asked questions the most when they were read their Miranda rights. This was mainly caused by the imbalance of knowledge between the two sides, which is one of the features found in institutional discourse. In the end, foreign suspects use a question as a means to protect their rights and make a statement favorable to themselves. Third, interpreters asked questions mainly about the case under examination to foreign suspects and police officers. This was also attributable to the imbalance of information and knowledge between the parties involved. In addition, interpreters sometimes asked additional questions to foreign suspects to get exact answers to the questions asked by police officers. This shows that interpreters use questions to confirm the accuracy of their interpretation or lead foreign suspects to provide answers appropriate to the questions police officers ask.
Abstract
This study intends to examine the types and functions of interrogative sentences used in the interpreting of police-suspect interview discourse in Korea. The findings of this analysis are as follows: First, the Korean police usually employed wh-interrogative sentences to ask for information from foreign suspects while using negative yes-no questions or declarative questions to refute the statements of foreign suspects. This attests to the fact that police officers use different types of interrogative sentences based on their investigation strategies. Second, foreign suspects made a number of questions about the intention of police officers’ questions or others. In particular, they asked questions the most when they were read their Miranda rights. This was mainly caused by the imbalance of knowledge between the two sides, which is one of the features found in institutional discourse. In the end, foreign suspects use a question as a means to protect their rights and make a statement favorable to themselves. Third, interpreters asked questions mainly about the case under examination to foreign suspects and police officers. This was also attributable to the imbalance of information and knowledge between the parties involved. In addition, interpreters sometimes asked additional questions to foreign suspects to get exact answers to the questions asked by police officers. This shows that interpreters use questions to confirm the accuracy of their interpretation or lead foreign suspects to provide answers appropriate to the questions police officers ask.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김민지, "한국형 미란다 경고의 문제점과 개선 방안", 형사정책연구, 23(3), pp.53~89 (2012), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 박용익, "의사-환자 대화의 제도적 특징과 유형학", 텍스트언어학, 21, pp.207~237 (2006), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 이원표, "한보청문회에서의 질문 분석: 제도상황과 화자의 태도 표현1", 사회언어학, 6(1), pp.1~25 (1998)
- 이원표, "한보청문회에서의 질문 분석: 제도상황과 화자의 태도 표현2", 사회언어학, 6(1), pp.26~52 (1998)
- 이유진, "한국 형사재판 법정통역사의 역할 인식에 관한 연구: 중국어 통역 담화분석 및 통역사 면접조사를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2015
- 이유진, "중국어 통역사의 법정통역 규범 인식 연구 - 정확성 관련 규범을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 18(1), pp.103~130 (2016), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이유진, "한국 법정통역인의 사회적 역할에 관한 연구", 통역과 번역, 18, pp.111~136 (2016), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이지은, "법정통역 담화분석연구: 사례연구를 중심으로", 번역학회 이화여대 공동주최 봄 학술대회 발표논문집, pp.191~198 (2011)
- 이지은, "법정신문에 사용되는 질문유형과 통역", 통역과 번역, 13(2), pp.127~146 (2011), 한국통역번역학회
- 이지은, "난민재판 통역의 질에 대한 고찰: 통역인의 역할에 관한 사례연구를 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 14(1), pp.213~236 (2012), 한국통역번역학회
- 이지은, "다문화사회와 사법통역" (2012), 집문당
- 이지은, "사법통역의 이론과 실제" (2017), 이화여대 출판문화원
- 이지은, "통역이론: 경찰통역 원칙과 직무윤리", 2018년 경찰 민간통역인 위탁교육 교재, ~ (2018)
- 이지은, "사법통역인의 순차통역 평가 사례 연구", 언어학연구, 20(1), pp.99~118 (2015), 한국언어연구학회
- 진제희, "기능단계별로 나타난 의료면담의 제도 대화적 특징 연구", 사회언어학, 14(1), pp.137~164 (2006), 한국사회언어학회
- 홍서연, "경찰통역 담화 연구: 한러 대면 및 전화통역 담화의 대화분석을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2019
- Aldridge, M., "Linguistic manipulation in legal discourse: Framing questions and “smuggling” information", The International Journal of Speech, Language, and the Law, 14(1), pp.85~107 (2007)
- Benmaman, V., "The Critical Link: Interpreters in the Community", pp.179~190 (1997), John Benjamins
- Drew, P., "Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings", pp.470~520 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Drew, P., "Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings", pp.3~65 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Freed, A., "The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 21, pp.621~644 (1994)
- Gonzalez, R. D., "Fundamentals of Court Interpretation" (1991), Carolina Academic Press
- Haworth, K., "The dynamic of power and resistance in police interview discourse", Discourse & Society, 17(6), pp.739~759 (2006)
- Heritage, J., "Talk in Action: Interaction, Identities, and Institutions" (2010), Wiley-Blackwell
- Hale, S., "Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting", pp.99~122 (2008), John Benjamins
- Lakoff, R., "My life in court", GURT, 85, pp.171~179 (1985)
- Nakane, I., "Problems in communicating the suspect’s rights in interpreted police interviews", Applied Linguistics, 28(1), pp.87~112 (2007)
- Thornborrow, J., "Power Talk: Language an Interaction in Institutional Discourse" (2002), Longman
- Woodbury, H, "The strategic use of questions in court", Semiotica, 48, pp.197~228 (1984)
- Zimmerman, D., "Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance", pp.105~129 (1975), Newbury House