영 · 한 번역과정에서의 서법전환에 관한 연구
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(4), 111-128. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the matches and mismatches of mood structures in translating English (source) texts into Korean (target) texts. As for the correspondence of mood structures in the two languages, there are two positions: The first one is that there are considerable mood mismatches in translation between the two languages, because there are differences in linguistic typology between them; the second one is that there will be considerable canonical correspondences between mood types and illocutionary forces in the two languages. It is shown that the second (position) is true. In addition, we examine the possible factors which cause (the) mood mismatches in terms of the person types of the subjects, the verbal types, the types of interrogative clauses, and the presence of tag-questions. First, it is shown that the second person subjects are more responsible for the mood change in translation than the first or third person subjects. Second, it is shown that English dynamic verbs more readily cause mood changes in translation than non-dynamic ones. Third, English yes-no questions are more accessible to mood changes in translation than wh-questions. Fourth, English tag-questions which involve the declarative mood are all translated into Korean with interrogative mood.
Abstract
The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 16(4), 111-128. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the matches and mismatches of mood structures in translating English (source) texts into Korean (target) texts. As for the correspondence of mood structures in the two languages, there are two positions: The first one is that there are considerable mood mismatches in translation between the two languages, because there are differences in linguistic typology between them; the second one is that there will be considerable canonical correspondences between mood types and illocutionary forces in the two languages. It is shown that the second (position) is true. In addition, we examine the possible factors which cause (the) mood mismatches in terms of the person types of the subjects, the verbal types, the types of interrogative clauses, and the presence of tag-questions. First, it is shown that the second person subjects are more responsible for the mood change in translation than the first or third person subjects. Second, it is shown that English dynamic verbs more readily cause mood changes in translation than non-dynamic ones. Third, English yes-no questions are more accessible to mood changes in translation than wh-questions. Fourth, English tag-questions which involve the declarative mood are all translated into Korean with interrogative mood.
참고문헌 (21)
- 고영근, "현대국어의 선어말 어미에 대한 구조적 연구", 어학연구, 3(1), pp.51~63 (1967)
- 고영근, "국어형태론 연구" (1989), 서울대학교
- 권재일, "한국어 통사론" (1992), 민음사
- 박영순, "한국어 문장의미론" (2001), 박이정
- 우수정, "Love actually" (2004), 스크린 영어사
- 우수정, "Notting hill" (2005), 스크린 영어사
- 서울대학교 국어교육연구소, "국어 교육학 사전" (1999), 대교출판
- 정경호, "O.Henry‘s short stories" (2006), S.P.G.
- Allan, K., "Clause-type, primary illocution, and mood-like operators in English", Language Sciences, 28, pp.1~50 (2004)
- Borjars, K., "Introducing English grammar" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Downing, A., "university course in English grammar" (1992), Prentice-Hall
- Eggins,S., "An introduction to systemic functional linguistics" (2004), Continuum
- Harnish,R., "Mood and inference", Research in Language, 4, pp.57~75 (2006)
- Harnish,R., "Mood: What's the illocutionary point. In : Current trends in pragmatics", pp.182~204 (2007), Cambridge Scholars Press
- Fraser,B., "A Partial analysis of vernacular performative. In : Towards tomorrow's linguistics", pp.139~158 (1974), Georgetown University Press
- Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge grammar of the English language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Jespersen,O., "The philosophy of grammar" (1924), Norton
- Leech,G., "Principles of pragmatics" (1983), Longman
- Levinson,S., "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Sadock, J., "Speech act distinctions in syntax. In : typology and syntactic description", pp.155~196 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Searle,J., "The classification of illocutionary acts", Language in Society, 5, pp.1~24 (1976)