A Study on the “Interpretation Government”: Scapegoating interpreters for Social Disorder during the Post-Colonial Era
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explores the portrayal of interpreters as represented in the novels on one hand and in the documents on the other during the US military government after Korea’s liberation from Japan. Interpreting discussed in this paper is never a matter of language, but a political, power-related activity. The interpreters who were expected to serve as the medium of communication between the US military government and Korean people were criticised as profiteers and a great social evil. The paper argues that the resentment and frustration among people were not directed towards the US nor Korean intellectuals, but instead were directed at the interpreters. The interpreters became more acceptable targets than people with power because they were viewed by general people as unlikely to fight back. The new reality fraught with problems frustrated people and they needed a scapegoat, thus attributing the problems disproportionately to the interpreters.
Abstract
This study explores the portrayal of interpreters as represented in the novels on one hand and in the documents on the other during the US military government after Korea’s liberation from Japan. Interpreting discussed in this paper is never a matter of language, but a political, power-related activity. The interpreters who were expected to serve as the medium of communication between the US military government and Korean people were criticised as profiteers and a great social evil. The paper argues that the resentment and frustration among people were not directed towards the US nor Korean intellectuals, but instead were directed at the interpreters. The interpreters became more acceptable targets than people with power because they were viewed by general people as unlikely to fight back. The new reality fraught with problems frustrated people and they needed a scapegoat, thus attributing the problems disproportionately to the interpreters.
참고문헌 (12)
- Ben-Ari, N., "Representation of translators of popular culture", Translation and Interpreting Studies, 5(2), pp.220~242 (2010)
- Cho, H., "Translation’s Forgotten History : Russian Literature, Japanese Mediation and the Formation of Modem Korean Literature" (2016), Harvard University Asia Center Press
- Gentzler, Edwin, "Translation and Power", pp.ix~xxviii (2002), University of Massachusetts Press
- 조윤정, "언어의 위계와 어법의 균열 -해방기~1960년대, 한국의 언어적 혼종상태와 문학자의 자의식", 현대문학의 연구, (46), pp.73~113 (2012), 한국문학연구학회[DOI]
- Kim J., "Representations of Colonial Collaboration and Literature of Decolonization in Korea, 1945-1950", Doctor, pp.2016
- 김영신, "픽션속에 나타난 문화번역과 법정통역 연구: 수키 김의 The Interpreter를 중심으로", 통번역교육연구, 16(1), pp.229~244 (2018), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
- 이혜령, "문지방의 언어들 ― 통역체제로서 식민지 언어현상에 대한 소고 ―", 동악어문학, (54), pp.45~98 (2010), 동악어문학회
- 나병철, "언어의 제국과 번역의 경제 ─염상섭의 「해방의 아들」과 「양과자갑」을 중심으로─", 청람어문교육, (69), pp.331~355 (2019), 청람어문교육학회[DOI]
- 박소영, "미군정기 통역정치: 이묘묵을 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 23(2), pp.93~116 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 송혜원, "미군 통역들의 문학사: 두 개의 제국과 근현대 ‘조선문학’", 동방학지, (192), pp.25~48 (2020), 국학연구원[DOI]
- Stevenson, J., "Korean Short Fiction from the Liberation Period, 1945-1948", MA, pp.1998
- 임세화, "불통(不通)의 언어, 번역된 정치 －해방기 ‘통역정치’와 문학의 언어를 중심으로－", 사이間SAI, (26), pp.55~95 (2019), 국제한국문학문화학회[DOI]