본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Which Formulaic Sequences to Teach in EFL Classrooms?: Different Types of Lexical Phrases and Their Impact on Perceived Oral Fluency

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

定型的言語表現(FS)の使用は、流暢に話すために役立つため、スピーキングで重要な要素 であると報告されている。多くの研究は、FSが流暢性に与える影響を量的に研究している。 そのような研究では、FSの頻度が流暢性に与える影響に焦点が当てられている。しかし、ど のような種類のFSが流暢性に最も関係しているかという質的な問題については、あまり注目 されてきていない。本研究では、レキシカル・フレイズ(lexical phrase)と呼ばれるFSのサ ブカテゴリーに焦点を当て、流暢性に特に影響を与えるlexical phrasesについて報告する。デ ータは日本のEFL大学生34人から収集した。協力者は毎週5週間、短い文章を読み、それを 口頭で要約した。また、要約を上達させるためlexical phrasesをどのように使えばよいかをレ クチャーした。その結果、流暢さの向上に最も貢献したのは、センテンス・ビルダー (sentence builder)の形で使用されるロジカル・コネクター(logical connector)や沈黙を埋 めるために使われるfluency deviceの使用であることがわかった。本研究は、FL教室において 、流暢性に最も貢献する特定のlexical phrasesを教えることの重要性を示唆する。

Abstract

The use of formulaic sequences (FSs) is reported to be an important factor in oral production as it helps speakers come across as fluent. Many studies have looked at the impact of FSs on fluency from a quantitative angle. Such studies focus upon the impact of the frequency of FSs upon fluency. However, less attention has been paid to the qualitative question of which kinds of FSs have particular salience in speaker fluency. In this study, I focus on a sub-category of FS called lexical phrases and report on how some of these have a greater effect on fluency than others. Data were collected from 34 EFL university students in Japan. Every week for five weeks they were asked to read a short passage and summarize it orally. They were also given a lecture on how they could use lexical phrases to improve their summaries. The results showed that it was the use of certain types of lexical phrases such as logical connectors and fluency devices in the form of sentence builders that were most salient in contributing to fluency. The study highlights the importance of teaching certain lexical phrases that contribute most to fluency in FL classrooms.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Adel, A., "Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English : A lexical bundles approach", English for Specific Purposes, 31, pp.81~92 (2012)[DOI]
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Formulas, routines, and conventional expressions in pragmatics research", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.206~227 (2012)[DOI]
  3. Biber, D., "Stance in spoken and written university registers", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), pp.97~116 (2006)[DOI]
  4. Boers, F., "Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency : Putting a lexical approach to the test", Language Teaching Research, 10, pp.245~261 (2006)[DOI]
  5. Boers, F., "Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.83~110 (2012)[DOI]
  6. Conklin, K., "Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?", Applied Linguistics, 29(1), pp.72~89 (2008)[DOI]
  7. Cortes, V., "Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology", English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), pp.397~423 (2004)[DOI]
  8. Coxhead, A., "Replication research in pedagogical approaches to formulaic sequences : Jones & Haywood(2004)and Alali & Schmitt(2012)", Language Teaching, 51(1), pp.113~123 (2018)[DOI]
  9. de Jong, N., "Fluency training in the ESL classroom : An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization", Language Learning, 61(2), pp.533~568 (2011)[DOI]
  10. Erman, B., "The idiom principle and the open choice principle", Text, 20(1), pp.29~62 (2000)[DOI]
  11. Flowerdew, J., "The teaching of academic listening comprehension and the question of authenticity", English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), pp.27~46 (1997)[DOI]
  12. Foster, P., "Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing", pp.75~94 (2001), Longman
  13. Hyland, K., "As can be seen : Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation", English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), pp.4~21 (2008)[DOI]
  14. Karabacak, E., "Comparison of lexical bundles used by Turkish, Chinese, and American university students", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, pp.622~628 (2013)[DOI]
  15. Kashiha, H., "Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines", Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(2), pp.15~27 (2014)[DOI]
  16. Lennon, P., "Investigating fluency in EFL : A quantitative approach", Language Learning, 40(3), pp.387~417 (1990)[DOI]
  17. McGuire, M., "Teaching formulaic sequences in the classroom : Effects on spoken fluency", TESL Canada Journal = Revue TESL Du Canada, 34(3), pp.1~25 (2017)[DOI]
  18. Nam, D., "Functional distribution of lexical bundle in native and non-native students’ argumentative writing", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(2), pp.703~716 (2017)[DOI]
  19. Nattinger, J. R., "Lexical phrases and language teaching" (1992), Oxford University Press
  20. Ogawa, C., "Revised 4", 3, The Journal of Asia TEFL, pp.2021, 18(4)[DOI]
  21. Pawley, A., "Language and communication", pp.191~226 (1983), Longman
  22. Segalowitz, N., "Cognitive bases of second language fluency" (2010), Routledge
  23. Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  24. Skehan, P., "Ladders and snakes in second language fluency", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54, pp.97~111 (2016)[DOI]
  25. Stengers, H., "Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association?", IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49, pp.321~343 (2011)[DOI]
  26. Taguchi, N., "Chunk learning and the development of spoken discourse in a Japanese as a foreign language classroom", Language Teaching Research, 11(4), pp.433~457 (2007)[DOI]
  27. Taguchi, N., "Training effects on the development of oral fluency in L2 Japanese", Japanese Language and Literature, 42(2), pp.413~437 (2008)
  28. Tavakoli, P., "Development of speech fluency over a short period of time : Effects of pedagogic intervention", TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), pp.447~471 (2016)[DOI]
  29. Tavakoli, P., "To what extent are multiword sequences associated with oral fluency?", Language Learning, 70(2), pp.506~547 (2020)[DOI]
  30. Thomson, H., "Building speaking fluency with multiword expressions", TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), pp.26~53 (2017)[DOI]
  31. Wood, D., "Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech : An exploration of the foundations of fluency", Canadian Modern Language Review, 2006, pp.63(1), 13~33
  32. Wood, D., "Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence, and classroom applications" (2010), Continuum
  33. Wood, D., "Fundamentals of formulaic language: An introduction" (2015), Bloomsbury Academic
  34. Wray, A., "Formulaic language and the lexicon" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  35. Wray, A., "Use of formulaic language by a Japanese-English bilingual child : A practical approach to data analysis", Japan Journal of Multilingualism and Multiculturalism, 9(1), pp.24~51 (2003)
  36. Zipagan, M. N., "Korean English learners use of lexical bundles in speaking", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), pp.276~291 (2018)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)