Revised 4/3/2 Task: Fluency Training with Formulaic Language in the EFL Classroom
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent additional interventions to the 3/2/1 task help EFL learners develop speaking fluency. Participants were 48 university students in Japan. The 3/2/1 task was implemented 11 times in one 15-week academic semester. The participants were divided into three groups including 1) comparison group, 2) input enhancement group, and 3) input + peer-check group. Speaking data were recorded in weeks 2 and 14, transcribed, and analyzed based on five fluency measures. The pre-/post-recording data showed significant gains in mean length of runs in both experimental groups and in phonation time ratio in the input + peer-check group. Further analyses indicated that the increase in the mean length of runs is associated with the frequency of target formulaic language usage. The implications of fluency promoting instructions in EFL classrooms are discussed.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent additional interventions to the 3/2/1 task help EFL learners develop speaking fluency. Participants were 48 university students in Japan. The 3/2/1 task was implemented 11 times in one 15-week academic semester. The participants were divided into three groups including 1) comparison group, 2) input enhancement group, and 3) input + peer-check group. Speaking data were recorded in weeks 2 and 14, transcribed, and analyzed based on five fluency measures. The pre-/post-recording data showed significant gains in mean length of runs in both experimental groups and in phonation time ratio in the input + peer-check group. Further analyses indicated that the increase in the mean length of runs is associated with the frequency of target formulaic language usage. The implications of fluency promoting instructions in EFL classrooms are discussed.
참고문헌 (43)
- Boers, F., "A reappraisal of the 4", 3, RELC Journal, pp.2014, 45(3)[DOI]
- Boers, F., "Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.83~110 (2012)[DOI]
- Boers, F., "Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency : Putting a lexical approach to the test", Language Teaching Research, 10(3), pp.245~261 (2006)[DOI]
- (2009)[URL]
- Bosker, H. R., "What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs", Language Testing, 30(2), pp.159~175 (2013)[DOI]
- Tuan Ngoc Bui, "Revisiting the Impact of 4", 3, 3, pp.3 Tasks on Learners’ Speaking Performance and Development: A Learner’s Perspective, Journal of Asia TEFL[DOI]
- De Jong, N. H., "Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency", Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS), pp.17~20 (2013), Royal Institute of Technology
- De Jong, N., "Fluency training in the ESL classroom : An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization", Language Learning, 61(2), pp.533~568 (2011)[DOI]
- De Jong, N. H., "Second language fluency : Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior", Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), pp.223~243 (2015)[DOI]
- Doughty, C., "Second language instruction does make a difference : Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(4), pp.431~469 (1991)[DOI]
- Dörnyei, Z., "Teaching conversation skills intensively : Course content and rationale", ELT Journal, 48(1), pp.40~49 (1994)[DOI]
- Foster, P., "Oral fluency in a second language : A research agenda for the next ten years", Language Teaching, 53(4), pp.446~461 (2020)[DOI]
- Gatbonton, E., "Creative automatization : Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework", TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), pp.473~492 (1988)[DOI]
- Kehe, D., "Conversation strategies" (1994), Pro Lingua
- Kormos, J., "Speech production and second language acquisition" (2006), Erlbaum
- Paul Leeming, "Expanding on Willis’ TBL Framework: The Integrated Input Output Framework", Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(1), pp.215~224 (2020), 아시아테플
- Lennon, P., "Investigating fluency in EFL : A quantitative approach", Language Learning, 40(3), pp.387~417 (1990)[DOI]
- Levelt, W. J. M., "Speaking : From intention to articulation" (1989), MIT Press
- Nation, I. S. P., "Improving speaking fluency", System, 17(3), pp.377~384 (1989)[DOI]
- Nation, P., "The four strands", Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), pp.2~13 (2007)[DOI]
- Morris, C., "Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing", Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16(5), pp.519~533 (1977)[DOI]
- Plonsky, L., "How big is"big"? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research", Language Learning, 64(4), pp.878~912 (2014)[DOI]
- Rossiter, M. J., "Oral fluency : The neglected component in the communicative language classroom", Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(4), pp.583~606 (2010)
- Segalowitz, N., "The handbook of second language acquisition", pp.382~408 (2003), Blackwell
- Segalowitz, N., "The cognitive bases of second language fluency" (2010), Routledge
- Sharwood-Smith, M., "Input enhancement in instructed SLA : Theoretical bases", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), pp.165~179 (1993)[DOI]
- Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
- Suzuki, S., "Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency : An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), pp.143~167 (2020)[DOI]
- Szudarski, P., "The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners’ acquisition of collocations", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(2), pp.245~265 (2016)[DOI]
- Tavakoli, P., "Planning and task-performance in a second language", pp.239~273 (2005), Benjamins
- Tavakoli, P., "Development of speech fluency over a short period of time : Effects of pedagogic intervention", TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), pp.447~471 (2016)[DOI]
- Tavakoli, P., "Is fluency being ‘neglected’ in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices", Language Teaching Research, 22(3), pp.330~349 (2018)[DOI]
- Tavakoli, P., "To what extent are multiword sequences associated with oral fluency", Language Learning, 70(2), pp.506~547 (2020)[DOI]
- Tran, M., "Effects of the 4", 3, Language Teaching Research, pp.2016[DOI]
- Thai, C., "Repeating a monologue under increasing time pressure : Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy", TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), pp.369~393 (2016)[DOI]
- Thomson, H., "Building speaking fluency with multiword expression", TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), pp.26~53 (2017)[DOI]
- Towell, R., "The development of fluency in advanced learners of French", Applied Linguistics, 17(1), pp.84~119 (1996)[DOI]
- Wood, D., "Effects of focused instruction of formulaic sequences on fluent expression in second language narratives : A case study", Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), pp.39~57 (2009)
- Wood, D., "Formulaic language and second language speech fluency" (2010), Continuum
- Wood, D., "Fundamentals of formulaic language: An introduction" (2015), Bloomsbury
- Wray, A., "Formulaic language and the lexicon" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Yuan, F., "The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production", Applied Linguistics, 24(1), pp.1~27 (2003)[DOI]
- Maribel N. Zipagan, "Korean English Learners’ Use of Lexical Bundles in Speaking", Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), pp.276~291 (2018), 아시아테플
