대상과 상대를 나타내는 「に」와 「に対して」의 용법 고찰-中納言 2000년대 작품을 중심으로-
A Study on the Usage of “ni” and “ni taisite” to Indicate Target and Opponent: Focusing on Works from the 2000s in the Chūnōgon Database
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In previous studies, it was mentioned that the use of the postpositional particle “に” and the postpositional phrase “ni taisite” is often similar in the categories of target and counterpart, but there are differences in terms of style, with “ni taisite” tending to be used more for formal expressions. However, an examination of the differences in usage of these two expressions, based on works from the 2000s in the Chūnagon Teitabeisu database, revealed that while both expressions share many similarities, they differ in actual usage due to their unique characteristics. First, in terms of common points between “ni” and “ni taisite,” an analysis of the preceding elements categorized as target and counterpart shows that both expressions are more frequently used with the target than with the counterpart. Additionally, it was found that nouns are the most commonly used preceding element for both expressions. Second, both “ni” and “ni taisite” can be appropriately used in cases such as the target of an action (counterpart), the target of emotions or reactions, the target of attitude and reactions, and the counterpart of an attitude. However, “に” is more commonly used to indicate simple actions or direct reactions, while “ni taisite” tends to be used when intentional attitude or direction is emphasized. Third, a difference in the usage of “ni” and “にtaisite” can often be determined by the characteristics of the following element. Specifically, expressions indicating strong characteristics of the following element, such as direct reactions or actions (e.g., “teo ageru,” “hureru,” “kiduku,” “kakeru,” “oituku”), are more likely to be combined with “ni”" while expressions where actions or attitudes are more clearly expressed (e.g., “hinansuru,” “tatakau,” “ikario kannziru,” “aturyokuga kuwaru,” “hukusyuuo okonau”) tend to be more easily combined with “ni taisite.” Fourth, in some cases, the use of “ni” and “ni taisite” is determined by the preceding element. For example, when the following element is “yowai,” and the preceding element refers to a person, only “に” can be used. On the other hand, “ni taisite” is used when the preceding element indicates a comparison, which distinguishes it from “ni.” Fifth, in terms of stylistic differences mentioned in previous studies, both “ni” and “ni taisite” are commonly used in conversation, but “に” is primarily used to express general facts or reactions, while “ni taisite” is used more frequently to express intentional actions or attitudes, rather than for formal expressions.
Abstract
In previous studies, it was mentioned that the use of the postpositional particle “に” and the postpositional phrase “ni taisite” is often similar in the categories of target and counterpart, but there are differences in terms of style, with “ni taisite” tending to be used more for formal expressions. However, an examination of the differences in usage of these two expressions, based on works from the 2000s in the Chūnagon Teitabeisu database, revealed that while both expressions share many similarities, they differ in actual usage due to their unique characteristics. First, in terms of common points between “ni” and “ni taisite,” an analysis of the preceding elements categorized as target and counterpart shows that both expressions are more frequently used with the target than with the counterpart. Additionally, it was found that nouns are the most commonly used preceding element for both expressions. Second, both “ni” and “ni taisite” can be appropriately used in cases such as the target of an action (counterpart), the target of emotions or reactions, the target of attitude and reactions, and the counterpart of an attitude. However, “に” is more commonly used to indicate simple actions or direct reactions, while “ni taisite” tends to be used when intentional attitude or direction is emphasized. Third, a difference in the usage of “ni” and “にtaisite” can often be determined by the characteristics of the following element. Specifically, expressions indicating strong characteristics of the following element, such as direct reactions or actions (e.g., “teo ageru,” “hureru,” “kiduku,” “kakeru,” “oituku”), are more likely to be combined with “ni”" while expressions where actions or attitudes are more clearly expressed (e.g., “hinansuru,” “tatakau,” “ikario kannziru,” “aturyokuga kuwaru,” “hukusyuuo okonau”) tend to be more easily combined with “ni taisite.” Fourth, in some cases, the use of “ni” and “ni taisite” is determined by the preceding element. For example, when the following element is “yowai,” and the preceding element refers to a person, only “に” can be used. On the other hand, “ni taisite” is used when the preceding element indicates a comparison, which distinguishes it from “ni.” Fifth, in terms of stylistic differences mentioned in previous studies, both “ni” and “ni taisite” are commonly used in conversation, but “に” is primarily used to express general facts or reactions, while “ni taisite” is used more frequently to express intentional actions or attitudes, rather than for formal expressions.
참고문헌 (11)
- 佐藤尚子, "現代日本語の後置詞の機能-『~について』と『~に対して』", 国語研究, (7), pp.35~44 (1989), 横浜国立大学国語国文学会
- 鈴木重幸, "日本語文法․形態論", pp.499~ (1972), むぎ書房
- 鈴木智美, "複合助詞がこれでわかる", pp.25~36 (2007), 東京外国語大学留学生日本語教育センター
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅰ", pp.185~ (1982), くろしお出版
- 横田淳子, "『に対して』の意味と用法", 東京外国語大学留学生日本語教育センター論集, 32, pp.19~31 (2006), 東京外国語大学
- 益岡隆志, "日本語文法 セルフ․マスターシリーズ3", pp.10~20 (1987), くろしお出版
- 권은숙, "일본어 조사『に』에 관한 고찰- 한․일어학습자의 오용분석을 통하여-", 일본학연구, 19, pp.393~416 (2006), 檀國大學校 日本硏究所
- 鄭惠芝, "について』와 『に對して』의 의미․용법상의 차이에 관한 고찰-일본어 교육으로의 활용방안-", 日本文化論叢, 12, pp.103~120 (2012), 輯, 일본문화학회
- 조병현, "한국어 일본어 학습자의 격조사 『に』습득에 관한 연구", 일본문화연구, 39, pp.503~523 (2011), 동아시아일본학회
- 李炫雨, "「格助詞」『に』の意味と用法に関する研究", 일본어문학, 89, pp.97~113 (2020), 일본어문학회
- "中納言データベース(2000년대 작품)", ~ (2000)
