「に対して」와 「에 대하여」의 용법 고찰 -격조사 「に」 「에」 「에게」 「을」과의 대조를 중심으로-

Abstract

In order to examine the usage of the postpositions, 「ni taishite」 and ‘e daehayeo’, the case markers, 「ni」 and ‘e, ege, ul’, which are similar respectively, have been compared and analysed. The results are as followed. Firstly, 「ni taishite」 has ‘comparison’ usage as mentioned in the preceding study. In Korean, ‘e daehayeo’ does not have ‘comparison’ usage and was usually being used as the postposition, ‘e bihae’. Secondly, 「ni taishite」 was used easily when verbs indicating pure language and thinking activities or evaluation on a following component displayed a leading component as content. In other words, in case of 「ni taishite」 appearing, 「ni taishite」 was used easily. Thirdly, ‘e daehayeo’ was used with ease when verbs showing psychological attitudes on a following component represented a leading component as content. ‘e daehayeo’ was the same as 「ni taishite」 in that verbs indicating pure language and thinking activities or evaluation on a follow component displayed leading component as content. However, ‘e daehayeo’ was only used when expressions like ‘cool-headedly’ or ‘any sort of’ in the verbal part are presented. Fourthly, 「ni」 is used when stickiness of following and leading components feels strongly and leading ones are the causes or reasons of the following ones. In this case, 「ni」 and ‘e’are only possible. Fifthly, when leading components became ‘the object of mental attitude’ of following ones, 「ni taishite」 and 「ni」 were both easily presented. In korean, the same applied to ‘e daehayeo’ and ‘e’. However, depending on the features of following verbs, there were some differences between Korean and Japanese. Verbs like 「反対する(oppose)」 「賛成する(agree)」 「感謝する(thank)」 「注目する(watch)」 only had 「ni」, wher eas Korean ones had both ‘e’ and ‘eul’. Lastly, as mentioned in the preceding study, the 「okurisaki(where to forward)」 has the usage in which 「ni taishite」 is possible but ‘e daehayeo’ is impossible. 「ni taishite」 and 「ni」 were both possible in Japanese, whereas ‘ege’ was olny possible in Korean. In other words, in Korean when leading components are human nouns and become ‘opponent’ and ‘the object of the behavior’, ‘e daehayeo’ and ‘e’ are impossible and ‘ege’ is only possible.